Jump to content
o_a

Employer lied before interview, disadvantaging myself

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I am new to this forum and have a query about an interview I attended in the UK.

The hiring manager beforehand said certain questions would be asked a specific test would be given.

I was disadvantaged compared to other candidates when I spent so much time preparing only to discover on the day that the test and questions were completely different, hence why I was unsuccessful in landing the job.

 

Also, an interview question was more restrictive when asked to myself compared to other interviewees.

 

Is there a potential case I can bring to an employment tribunal to seek compensation (i.e. relating to Negligent Misstatement, fraud, etc.)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope..not a thing you can do. Better luck next time


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Why is that? Also, do you have a legal background?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome o_a

 

I've moved this thread to the Employment Forum.


 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fkofilee,

 

I don't understand how an employment tribunal would apply if, for example, I was discriminated by a company that didn't employ me, but it wouldn't apply for the specific situation I am in. Any idea why?

 

So from your answer, I assume what they did was perfectly legal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why wouldnt it be legal? You're basically saying you want to sue them or claim against them simply because you didn't pass an interview


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can prove that you were put at disadvantage DELIBERATELY by the hiring manager, than you might have a case.

However proving that (and note the word in capital letters) would be quite a challenge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a jot you can do. They don't owe you anything.

Maybe the company did this to everyone to put everyone in the same boat to make them think on their feet.

What if you got the job and someone Sai that they were disadvantaged because you had prior knowledge and therefore an advantage.

 

The only time a tribunal would touch this is if you had a protected characteristic case or disadvantaged because of a disability

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have applied for jobs, been interviewed and was told I had got the role, references taken up etc and then the employer changed their mind and promoted someone internally or gave to job to a more local person to save relocation expenses.

Can I sue them for the cost of my new interview suit that was obviously wasted? No.

 

How would you know that a question was more restrictive than the ones asked other interviewees? was it all conducted in an open office with everyone giving verbal responses at the same time?

Sorry, you didnt get the job and they use various methods of staff selection and n this occasion someone esle happened to preform better than you didn on the day

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi fkofilee,

 

I don't understand how an employment tribunal would apply if, for example, I was discriminated by a company that didn't employ me, but it wouldn't apply for the specific situation I am in. Any idea why?

 

So from your answer, I assume what they did was perfectly legal?

 

You : hello I would like to complain that this company told me all the questions to the interview beforehand and then the actual questions were wrong!

 

Then: so you tried cheating and are now moaning because the questions were different?

 

You: ermmmm.. yes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not a jot you can do. They don't owe you anything.

Maybe the company did this to everyone to put everyone in the same boat to make them think on their feet.

What if you got the job and someone Sai that they were disadvantaged because you had prior knowledge and therefore an advantage.

 

The only time a tribunal would touch this is if you had a protected characteristic case or disadvantaged because of a disability

 

Edit on last bit..

Protected characteristic or disability and it was directly used to disadvantage /discriminate/ segregate against you.

 

Ie you cant have this job because your in a wheelchair

Or

You canr have tho job because your a catholic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless the job was for cyclist courier and you're on a wheelchair or an imam at the mosque and you're catholic.

There are boundaries to discrimination.

I'm stating the obvious 😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?




  • Tweets

  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • I was talked into signing up with Future Comms (future-comms.co.uk) who cold-called me to change my mobile contract to them, via 02, rather than EE. I have a small business (only me!) and it's a business contract. True, the 4G network is better for my area. This company seemed to be a marketing set-up for various telecoms companies, so I assumed anything I signed would be with 02 and didn't think it might be a problem.
       
      They sent an email whilst I was on the phone to set up the direct debit mandate with my bank which I signed electronically. That was the first, of many, problems I found. Apparently THAT was my contract, binding me to 3 years and no 'cooling off' period, because I was a 'business' (meaning any consumer rights did not apply). When I subsequently asked in writing for a copy of my contract, that is what they sent - when I argued it was a DD mandate they insisted it was my contract!
       
      2 days later they asked for my phone details to get it unlocked which I sent. 10 days later, EE closed my account, so I changed the SIM card to 02 that had come a few days before. No network! They had done nothing about unlocking it. Fortunately I was lucky with EE who managed to give me the right codes, rather than the usual 10 days to go through Samsung.
       
      By this time I was suspicious of their set-up and wanted to cancel. As I said earlier, I found myself trapped into a 3 year contract with no 14 day cooling off period (they don't offer that). Promises to deal with my complaints never happened, promised return calls neither....and on and on.
       
      Ofcom's rules apply to consumers and small businesses (under 10 employees), yet this shower don't acknowledge that. They just repeat and repeat that I am a business so it doesn't apply. To cancel the contract I have to pay the full 3 year's fees!!
       
      I would like to know if others have had similar experiences? Or does anyone know how I can maybe declare the 'contract' unenforceable? I have never before been locked into something without a clear written contract, with t&c's! And, yes, I have asked, and yes, I have been ignored.
      • 84 replies
    • Future comms!. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415706-future-comms/
      • 10 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
×
×
  • Create New...