Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I am a University Student looking to rent accommodation along with three other Students We found a four bedroomed flat and called the Letting Agent to say we were very interested We had a viewing and raised some questions We wanted to check if there was a break clause in the Lease The Letting Agent said we would need to pay a Holding Deposit whilst he waited for the Landlady to return from Holiday So we paid £750 split between the four of us to the Letting Agent We then received an email to say the Holding Deposit was non refundable References were then checked and the tenancy Agreement arrived which needed to be signed by each guarantor and tenant and send back the full signed agreement At this point we got to see the Tenancy Agreement for the first time and the break clause of 6 months was nowhere to be seen so this made us very nervous and we decided to pull out as we felt we didn’t want the risk of not being allowed to leave the property until a full year was up We emailed the Letting Agent who replied with the following: The holding deposit is not refundable as you are withdrawing from this deal. I will need a confirmation from Everyone that they are withdrawing and we will put the property back on the market.   The move in date is on the 4th Sept and the landlady is left with a very short time to find another tenant.    This will incur a lot of extra cost from both us as an agency and the landlady which we will try to recover. So, my question is are we eligible to get a refund of our Holding Deposit – bearing in mind we were not told we wouldn’t get it back until after we had paid it?
    • As for the rest @BankFodder please wait for my bullet points account and further uploads (I'm in the process of converting a lot of my files and screenshots to more condensed pdf thanks to reading one of your posts how to do this for free...but, it's taking time as I also have artritis in practically every bone in my body, as well as fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue, which affects my hands, and I have a lot of redacting to do).   I appreciate your trying to get an angle on this and your keen to help me in the best you can but, if I keep getting sidetracked like this, it will be counterproductive and frustrating for both/all of us.   On my #13 I gave a link to your skeleton argument pdf because, I'd carefully researched the posts for days before joining (as well as looking at posts over the last 5 years), which btw needs a bit more redaction on p6 as it's showing [her] name. That could be my case to a 'T' except add in the years back to 2006/2007, particularly since I went on their computer system and was 'treated' to their 1st system migration, and all the others that have followed. Not sure about this person's status but, for me you can also add in the fact that they've: continually failed to put me on their PSR; lost my password more than once (the one call I managed to recall was December 2016 when he openely admitted he couldn't find a trace of my being on a password scheme and they now have two whenever the meter reader arrives...and yes, I've done an SAR to the distributor already because they've failed to keep them informed of my status, that's all in hand); continually ignored my medical status of being disabled and unable to read my own meter (I've repeatedly told them about this, btw) due to not only bone-on-bone arthritis in my right knee (diagnosed 2011) but also a crumbling spine (extensive arthrits) with a prolapsed disc and extensive nerve damage (eventually diagnosed 2014), which leaves me at risk of developing corda equina; continually ignored my vulnerability status; and excarrebated my MH/PTSD over the years with their continuing bullying and threats.        
    • Hi Everyone. With the deadline for claiming PPI coming up I thought I better make one last attempt. Couple of quick questions though.. 1. I tried claiming with RBS about 5 years ago and they rejected my claim. Is there any point trying again? 2. I was going to use a company as I'm getting bombarded with "last chance" emails, but I probably don't want to do that as I've always done my own thing. That said, if I make my "Find out if you had PPI" enquiry online, does that mean I'm in before the deadline, or do I actually have to make a complaint before the 29th Aug?   Many thanks for any advice/ help
    • Har dee har har! Thanks! Im 3k apart . I need help so they drop the 3 k. But you got that! kr escaped!
  • Our picks

Teddy12

Illegal eviction damages claim

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 265 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

My friend has rented his house out for a number of years.

He had a disagreement with his last tenants and decided to end their tenancy, he is currently claiming through the small claim courts for damages to property.

 

Looking at his case I believe he may be opening up a huge can of worms as he’s made a few mistakes as listed below

 

1. When starting the tenancy he took a deposit which was not protected - the tenants are aware of this

 

2. He issued a section 21 notice 3 weeks before rent was due - the tenants were up to date with rent

 

3. He left them in the notice period with no hot water or heating and did not supply alternative heating - it was winter so property became very damp, the tennant withheld rent for this reason

 

4. When the section 21 notice finished he changed the locks without an eviction notice - the tenants still had furniture in the property

 

He is now trying to claim for damages to property as House was not left tidy, owing rent, and damages totalling £5000

 

The tenants have refuted his claims stating that they did not have a chance to empty the property or tidy it up to an acceptable condition due to being illegally evicted.

 

Am I right in thinking the courts will throw the book at him and potentially side with the tenants as he did not follow the correct legal proceedings?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Errr yes

What a terrible vindictive landlord who blatantly does not follow the law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it sounds like the tenants could counterclaim for:

 

- Unlawful eviction

- Return of the deposit

- Penalty of 3x the deposit for failing to protect it

- The condition of the property (the landlord has an obligation to keep the property in good repair)

- Breach of the tenancy agreement (since the landlord will have breached his obligation to let them have quiet enjoyment of the property)

- Inability to access their belongings

Plus their legal costs for defending the claim.

 

The landlord could also be prosecuted for unlawful eviction, which is a criminal offence.

 

Of course it is also possible that the tenants don't defend the case and the landlord simply gets given a default judgment.

 

So there is a whole rainbow of possible outcomes.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My friend has rented his house out for a number of years. He had a disagreement with his last tenants and decided to end their tenancy, he is currently claiming through the small claim courts for damages to property. Looking at his case I believe he may be opening up a huge can of worms as he’s made a few mistakes as listed below

1. When starting the tenancy he took a deposit which was not protected - the tenants are aware of this

2. He issued a section 21 notice 3 weeks before rent was due - the tenants were up to date with rent

3. He left them in the notice period with no hot water or heating and did not supply alternative heating - it was winter so property became very damp, the tennant withheld rent for this reason

4. When the section 21 notice finished he changed the locks without an eviction notice - the tenants still had furniture in the property

 

He is now trying to claim for damages to property as House was not left tidy, owing rent, and damages totalling £5000

 

The tenants have refuted his claims stating that they did not have a chance to empty the property or tidy it up to an acceptable condition due to being illegally evicted.

 

Am I right in thinking the courts will throw the book at him and potentially side with the tenants as he did not follow the correct legal proceedings?

 

I would advise him to mitigate as much as he can to keep it out of court, if I was the tenant I would be reporting him to the police. Hi is, and for good reason, looking at some serious trouble.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The claim has been defended with everything above written on it. He was sent a directions questionnaire - as were the tenants, he’s asked to go through mediation, the tenants have asked for it to be allocated to court, I think this will land him in deep hot water!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He also stupidly on his original claim form stated that the tenants has not returned the keys so had a lock smith change the locks, he stated the day this happened which was the day following the section 21 running out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He also stupidly on his original claim form stated that the tenants has not returned the keys so had a lock smith change the locks, he stated the day this happened which was the day following the section 21 running out.
h

 

Well I can only hope he’s done this out of stupidity and not arrogance, however I fear it’s the latter. I would now be trying to settle out of court and hope that they don’t realise that he has also committed at least one criminal offence, if he does end up in front of a Judge then he needs to apologise and offer to make it right, I don’t see how he could mitigate his actions without looking a nasty bit of work.

 

As it stands he’s looking at both a significant award against him from the civil court and also a criminal record. People can not be treated like that. Please keep us updated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My friend has rented his house out for a number of years.

He had a disagreement with his last tenants and decided to end their tenancy, he is currently claiming through the small claim courts for damages to property.

 

Looking at his case I believe he may be opening up a huge can of worms as he’s made a few mistakes as listed below

 

1. When starting the tenancy he took a deposit which was not protected - the tenants are aware of this

 

2. He issued a section 21 notice 3 weeks before rent was due - the tenants were up to date with rent

 

3. He left them in the notice period with no hot water or heating and did not supply alternative heating - it was winter so property became very damp, the tennant withheld rent for this reason

 

4. When the section 21 notice finished he changed the locks without an eviction notice - the tenants still had furniture in the property

 

He is now trying to claim for damages to property as House was not left tidy, owing rent, and damages totalling £5000

 

The tenants have refuted his claims stating that they did not have a chance to empty the property or tidy it up to an acceptable condition due to being illegally evicted.

 

Am I right in thinking the courts will throw the book at him and potentially side with the tenants as he did not follow the correct legal proceedings?

 

 

Well there’s some good news about the section 21 notice in point No.2 It’s a no fault notice so the point about rent being due/paid up is irrelevant. However, the other points have done for him. I’m not sure but I do think that failure to provide heating/hot water on purpose is a criminal offence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The good news about the S.21 is that it is “no fault” is negated by the fact that it wasn’t a valid S.21 notice......

Additionally, even if it were valid, if T doesn’t leave, then LL still has to go to court for a possession order.

 

The S.21 notice not requiring any fault isn’t really of any significance here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The good news about the S.21 is that it is “no fault” is negated by the fact that it wasn’t a valid S.21 notice......

Additionally, even if it were valid, if T doesn’t leave, then LL still has to go to court for a possession order.

 

The S.21 notice not requiring any fault isn’t really of any significance here.

 

Ah of course, failure to protect deposit! Doh, silly me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the feedback, he’s placed himself in a no win situation I think, from the defence the tenants have submitted in response to the initial claim the tenants are aware that firstly the whole situation in which the landlord has gained entry and removed their belongings was an illegal eviction, he’s also disposed of in excess (they claim) of £2500 of furniture and belongings, and they’ve also stated that the deposit wasn’t protected so I’m guessing they also know they can claim just for that.

He’s of the belief that he will be granted £5000 for repairs/removal/cleaning/lock, he said he’s received legal advice prior to filing the claim but I fear he may have failed to tell his solicitor that he entered the property illegally and hasn’t protected the deposit!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the feedback, he’s placed himself in a no win situation I think, from the defence the tenants have submitted in response to the initial claim the tenants are aware that firstly the whole situation in which the landlord has gained entry and removed their belongings was an illegal eviction, he’s also disposed of in excess (they claim) of £2500 of furniture and belongings, and they’ve also stated that the deposit wasn’t protected so I’m guessing they also know they can claim just for that.

He’s of the belief that he will be granted £5000 for repairs/removal/cleaning/lock, he said he’s received legal advice prior to filing the claim but I fear he may have failed to tell his solicitor that he entered the property illegally and hasn’t protected the deposit!

 

I genuinely hope he did not get that advice from the place that advised about the eviction.

 

So you are saying that even after all this he still thinks he is going to be succesful, when is the court date? Thank you again for the up date, I am very interested to see the outcome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I fear the legal advice may be via google!

The case has just been transferred to the county court hearing centre for allocation so no date set yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I fear the legal advice may be via google!

The case has just been transferred to the county court hearing centre for allocation so no date set yet.

 

Oh!

 

Please keep updating your post. It will be very interesting to see the outcome, especially for people just like him and people who have landlords like him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update. Date set for September however the landlord now has to pay a further £350 for allocation, I’m hoping this is a deterrent from taking it further but we will see!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just an update. Date set for September however the landlord now has to pay a further £350 for allocation, I’m hoping this is a deterrent from taking it further but we will see!

 

Further update, landlord has requested mediation rather than court hearing but the tenants have rejected mediation on the grounds of illegal eviction, non protection of deposit, disposal of furniture and non provision of heating/hot water.

This is going to court on the 18th September I think the tenants have a very strong defence, I cannot convince my friends husband- the landlord; to drop the case so how would you say he’s best proceeding? Personally I think he’s in with a shock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is going to court on the 18th September I think the tenants have a very strong defence, I cannot convince my friends husband- the landlord; to drop the case so how would you say he’s best proceeding?

 

Advise him that perhaps he should look at selling a couple of assets (maybe his house) and be prepared to pay out a four figure sum in compensation and costs.

 

Have the (ex)tenants filed a counter claim ?


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

Quote
No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Further update, landlord has requested mediation rather than court hearing but the tenants have rejected mediation on the grounds of illegal eviction, non protection of deposit, disposal of furniture and non provision of heating/hot water.

This is going to court on the 18th September I think the tenants have a very strong defence, I cannot convince my friends husband- the landlord; to drop the case so how would you say he’s best proceeding? Personally I think he’s in with a shock

 

Unfortunately we all learn lessons in different ways. The laws were put in place to provide punishment for those who take actions like this. I think it's important to call this chap exactly what he is, a rogue landlord who's complete disregard for the law has caught him out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok further update. Court hearing set for 2 weeks time. The landlord has provided the tenant with a file of evidence, within this file he has admitted everything including

1) never having seen the need to use a deposit scheme as they use a secure account instead

2) a letter from landlord to tennant threatening to remove them from the property within 7days (within the section21 notice period)

3) multiple statements from neighbours which all look identical - I fear these may be false

4) invoices from a locksmith stating the date he changed the locks

5) multiple pictures of the tennants property within the house and a statement saying he took it to the tip

 

I think in this document he may have completely thrown the book at himself.

By some small miracle is there a chance the judge may look past all the wrong move and just look at the costs it took to prepare the house for rerental?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just another thought. The tenants have instructed a solicitor could the landlord be liable for these cost?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just another thought. The tenants have instructed a solicitor could the landlord be liable for these cost?

 

What track has it been allocated to?

If to the small clams track, has his litigation behaviour been manifestly unreasonable??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes to small claims. Who’s behaviour are we talking about? Landlord or tenant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes to small claims.

 

Costs in the small claims track are strictly limited unless there has been entirely unreasonable behaviour.

 

Who’s behaviour are we talking about? Landlord or tenant

 

Both, but who are you saying has behaved badly?

The LL, correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think both have however the landlords failure to adhere to simple laws the rental of the property and the processes used to remove tenants out weighs the tenants wrong doings I fear

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just another thought. The tenants have instructed a solicitor could the landlord be liable for these cost?

 

Legal costs are not usually awarded in small claims track. However, they can be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably.

 

From what you've posted so far this particular landlord sounds as unreasonable as they come. Based on the limited information in this thread it sounds like there is a very good chance of him losing the case, being ordered to pay a penalty for not protecting the deposit and being ordered to pay the claimant's legal costs.

 

3) multiple statements from neighbours which all look identical - I fear these may be false

This is the worst of it. If the judge concludes that the landlord has been dishonest in his evidence, the landlord is highly likely to be ordered to pay the claimant's legal costs.

 

By some small miracle is there a chance the judge may look past all the wrong move and just look at the costs it took to prepare the house for rerental?

This is possible - anything can happen in court. But I don't think it will be easy for the judge to overlook blatent non-compliance with the requirement to protect a deposit, fraudulent evidence and what sounds like an illegal eviction.

 

The landlord has got himself in a real mess here. The best advice might be to try and reach a settlement with the Claimants before getting to court.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...