Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi,  I've had some issues uploading and redacting this - due to file types etc.. I've blanked out the first 10 pages.  There is a contents list - so let me know which areas you need to look at.    Many thanks   
    • I'm sorry to say but it is pretty clear that you haven't read around the other Hermes stories on this sub- forum and you don't even appear to have read some of the posts that I have put up on this thread.   The issue of Packlink has specifically been referred to in about post number three of this thread. Also you have been urged on at least three occasions on this thread to read around the sub- forum at the other Hermes stories.   All the issues that are coming up in your claim and raised by Hermes defence have been dealt with repeatedly and there are lots of threads with very substantial  explanations as to the appropriate arguments. I even posted up links to to useful threads earlier on today.   We are posting this stuff up for a joke. We are posting it up to you to help yourself. You have to invest yourself in this because the case is yours to win or yours to lose and if you win then the money is yours to keep. You can win this easily but if you simply need to be spoonfed all the time and am afraid that you won't be sufficiently confident and also you won't be sufficiently in control of what you want to say when the mediator was on the telephone.   Fill in the form that you have been sent and send it off and then start reading around this forum and certainly you should come back here when you have read around thoroughly and you still have questions and we will be very pleased to help you. However, you've got to do some of the work yourself – that is the deal here.
    • Meanwhile in Wales Drakeford has admitted he is delaying vacccinations in Wales to conserve supplies     https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1385384/mark-drakeford-wales-coronavirus-vaccine-pfizer-oxford-astrazeneca-vncinations.   https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/coronavirus-vaccine-wales-mark-drakeford-19645075
    • CPR  must be prioritised it cannot be delayed sorry but thats the situation.
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

Backdoor Arrow CCJ for MBNA CArd debt - now N56 ***Dismissed***


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 964 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

looked at the credit file

it's not good reading

id say 5 ccjs in total and no real way of paying them off

 

she had an iva for them and when she couldn't keep up the repayments they have it seems gone for her

 

i thought bankruptcy as she won't ever be able to pay them off

 

any idea

of course she can fill in the form and they can take it from her wages but as she has so many she will never be able to repay them

maybe the judge will see this but they seem to be on the side of the banks

 

any help appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

It's only one of them, don't kick the others if they are not chasing.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

agreed

 

so

 

still no wiser as to who she owes the debt with !!!

not on her credit file

what can we do to trace the debt to see if its sb

she can fill in the form and send off, however, what if she doesn't owe???

which should i do first

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post 19

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Court call found that the debt is from MBNA

we have asked for the original copy of ccj and the claim form to be posted which they are doing today

- if anyone is following this, the best time to get through is early. Press 2 then 3

 

attachment of earnings sent off

so what would the next step be

shoosmiths holds the debt/ccj - I don't think they should be called

who would I go to

mbna?

what if we don't have any data at all such as account no etc etc

 

bump

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends what you want to do next......accept the CCJ and comply with the Attachment of Earnings (which you have completed and sent off)

 

Or do you have a valid defence and wish to set a side the judgment and defend the claim.....in which case you should have ticked suspend the attachment of earning (N56).

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

well yes, id like to defend it if it is defendable andy.

so I want to cca someone

also, she was with payplan it seems so its more convoluted

 

I don't think she ticked suspend the action

we didn't know to do that

i do now

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

when do you think her last payment was?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

done it

 

go ring MBNA and ask then!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..last payment date:madgrin:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

here is the response

 

can I get a definitive answer to what this actually means from the mighty forum - dismissed to me means dismissed however that does not mean that the end of this story

thanks for looking

NO44.pdf

Edited by stu007
PDF Redacted
Link to post
Share on other sites

You must redact things!!!

I 've hidden that

 

They have 14 days to object

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i thought i did!!!

sorry

 

but what does the term dismissed mean - that the judge has decided to dismiss it on the grounds of her statement of earning?

what have they dismissed - the case of her repaying something?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

no redaction at all every pers number and names still shows.

 

read it slowly and properly..

 

after reading the N56 means statement he has ordered the AOE is dismissed.

if they object the claimant has 14 days to do so.

 

 

if I dismiss you from your job that means??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post 30 Attachment hidden

All pers details showing

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

hi

 

we have a response from shoosmiths

I am worried to upload

i did everything correctly yet it still shows all the personal details

i will attempt again

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think its any of their business how you intend to sustain you current level of expenditure and deficit.....offer what you can afford.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

its been dismissed by the judge

she hasn't a spare anything really

we offered 2 pounds the judge still threw it out

 

thanks for looking in

any observations appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

what been dismissed? the AEO?

if so well done bloody nose for arrows again...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Andyorch changed the title to Backdoor Arrow CCJ for MBNA CArd debt - now N56 ***Dismissed***
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...