Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 491 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Sorry thought I had redacted it? Do you mean redact all the dates as well?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No

But thw doc is totally unredacted

Claim number your name reg all showing

 

And the pictures??

Whats gone on there?

They look like 1930's sepia drawings...

 

You can leave dates


..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah I see.

 

I had to reduce quality of pictures etc to get it scanned in one. I'll re-scan now with and try and get it right way round

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Split it into 3 bits: WS, and 2 x exhibits

 

Looks redacted again to me?

 

If someone confirms it I'll add the other 2

VCredacted2.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

all blurred

how are you creating this PDF?

9Mb and its blurred

should be about 1mb and colour 1080p!


..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically scanning to a document on work printer.I'll have a play when I get home

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as the guide says

scan to JPG picture

redact

THEN merge to PDF.

 

dx


..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jake Burgess who wrote the WS is a nasty little Scrote.

Very early in his statement he averred that His company by Being members of the IPC are fully compliant with all the legal requirements

Of the IPC. This is wrong.

 

They are fully accredited Members because they LIED that they had all the Necessary legal requirements when they didn't And still don't to this day.

Jake knows this since he has worked there long Enough to see VCS lose cases precisely because They do not have the necessary legal permissions In all of their car parks.

 

Time and again they lose Because of a lack of planning permission or no Contract with the landowner for example

-which They should have had already if they were IPC Compliant.

 

By misdirecting the Court in this way, they give The impression that all their necessary paperwork And legalities are in order.

Nothing could be Further from the truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is rare but does happen that a judge will call out the WS of the claimany as being patently not a statement of truth and them make comments like if the author had the guts to attend they would be taken down for contempt of court. It does however allow you to stick the knife in when challenging the veracity fo the statement by saying something like I woudl ahve wished to cross examine the witness on these points, is ther any cahnce of an adjournement so they can attend and answer these questions? You will be told NO but you may get the WS itself struck out as inadmissible or stated that it is so unrelaiable it will be ignored

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...