Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi   With a SAR all you have to do is ask for 'ALL DATA' (this way it does not matter what format they hold that data whether it be digital, email, telephone calls (recorded), written etc).   They then have 30 Days to comply once they have acknowledged your SAR Request (that is unless they require ID Verification) which the 30 Days time limit does not start until they have verified your ID if requested)   Also can I add in DHL response in post#36 I hate it when any Company/Business etc. has the nerve to use the get out clause of 'Human Error'.    This is not the case as it was 'Maladministration' by DHL' not 'Human Error' as stated to you, irrespective of who/which employee of DHL made the 'Human Error' the buck stops with DHL as who/which employee made that error was Employed by DHL.
    • pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform. [if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] .  register as an individual  note the long gateway number given  then log in .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform .  defend all  leave jurisdiction unticked   goto the defence filing section  file the following:     1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).  2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.  . If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant. .  3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied. .. ..ends..   dx          
    • I passed on the article and link to friend. Between us we will now try get the required info to the correct location so that they (whoever in the Govt) can sort out what he is owed. I will keep you updated.  This thread may help others in similar situations. Ethel Street - very helpful research.  Thank you.  Seems like you came up trumps!
    • numerous erudio/drydens claimform threads here already - use our search top right.   your appears to be statute barred as you've never heard of erudio so would not have deferred since your last direct deferment to SLC in 2013    if you wish to bother to even send CCA/CPR that's upto you but the bottom line is to erudio you've ignored everything to date yoy might also ignore a claimform.   but ofcourse you are not!!   if the above is true   pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform. [if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] .  register as an individual  note the long gateway number given  then log in .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform .  defend all  leave jurisdiction unticked   goto the defence filing section  file the following: 1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).  2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.  . If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant. .  3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied. .. ..ends..   dx      
    • Well I would want my £50 back also but hey ho if your satisfied its been resolved.....there was no way you could ever be liable anyway as your contract was with TC not RC.   Thread title updated.   Andy
  • Our picks

MadAsh

British Gas - more Threats

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 624 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

BG £54 Charges by DECEPTIONS

 

NOT in my personal View; NOT 99.99% But it is a 100% FACT that; British Gas are using the MOST IMMORAL UNETHICAL DECEIVING Conducts to Obtain Money by DECEPTIONS from Members of the public, Especially the Vulnerable Ones

OVER the LAST 4-5 YEARS; When their FORGERY Bills are Challenged.

 

British Gas INSTRUCTS their 2 Offices, Name [removed] {Authorised Officer of British Gas} and [removed] {Authorised Officer of British Gas} to Launch their IMMORAL and UNETHICAL CONDUCTS; Under the ILLUSION of a Third Party Debit Collection Agent..

 

1. [Removed]; Send NOTIFICATION Letters; which Each and Every Letter she sent is dated on THURSDAY which is before the WEEKEND! And she send the letters by 2nd Class mail.

In her letter she advising customers to contact them to arrange payment and to AVOID £54 Charge for agent VISIT.

 

2. On Monday; and BEFORE the NOTIFICATION letter RECEIVED and/or EVEN probably REACHED to the Local Post Office. [Removed] {Authorised Officer of British Gas} send their Drivers to Drive around and DROP LETTERS and LETTER BOXES WITHOUT MAKING ANY CONTACT; and it is a 100% FACT that; British Gas charge £54 per Letter BEFORE their agent leave their Office to Deliver the letters; UNDER the ILLUSION a VISIT has been made and that is FACT.

 

3. It is FACT that; British Gas made FLAWED allegations that; this is carried out by a Third Party Agent and it has NOTHING to DO WITH BRITISH Gas; and the £54 Charges is Made by the Third Party which British Gas have to Pay them for it..

 

4. It is FACT that; the Third Party CONFIRMED to me in writing that; The above 2 Officers ACTED UNDER the DIRECT INSTRUCTIONS of British Gas and the £54 Charges GOES to British Gas and NOT Richburns.

 

ALL letter Header carried the LOGOS of BRITISH Gas and Richburns and NOT just a THIRD Party.

 

Furthermore;

On their Letters including the Final letters dated 17 Aug 2017 and 21 Aug 2017; It stated that{ Consumer Credit Licence Number 643197}

 

It is FACT that; The FCA Financial Conduct Authorities CONFIRMED to me that; the above Licence 643197 was PROVOKED on 31.5.2015 !!!!

Edited by dx100uk
Names removed -dx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Provoked ?


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Revoked I believe.

Madash has copy pasted this all over the place in many threads. I think they are not happy with British gas!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cant work out what the question we can offer advice on is though.

Got the bit about various people claiming agency on a spurious debt and not having locus though.

Perhaps the OP can tell us how he would like us to help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had plenty of those. And 'pre disconnection charges' with no disconnection. Or even a warrant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...