Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell claiming - old Very CAT debt***Claim Dismissed with Costs***


mollywobbles
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1882 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I started another thread a year or so ago, and received great advice.

 

In the end, we sent CCA requests to the creditors and I believe two sent responses.

We didn't make any settlement offers.

In fact we decided in view of the fact that the defaults would likely remain whatever we did to do absolutely nothing and see what happened next.

 

The baby is now 10 months old, and our housing situation is now secure

- some family money has meant that a house is now owned outright in my sole name,

for the time being we no longer need to concern ourselves with mortgage applications or credit checks for tenancies.

 

Obviously those maternity leave savings are long gone!

However, we have been putting around £180 a month into savings,

earmarked ideally for future unforeseen events

but with the idea that they could be used to pay off anyone if that really becomes necessary.

That figure currently stands at about £600, but will hopefully continue to grow now I'm back at work.

 

Obviously things have moved on from the creditors side and various threatening letters have started to arrive.

The most recent today, from Lowell, who it appears have bought the shop direct debt (£2487), which is entitled 'pre-legal assessment'.

Do we need to be concerned by this?

 

From a quick search it would seem perhaps not, or at least not yet?

I understand a claim form is the one thing that should not be ignored.

 

If that arrives though, what would happen next?

The history of these debts would mean their becoming statute barred is still a long way off (5 years).

Am I missing any other possible responses to a claim form that would have a positive outcome for him / us??

 

Any more advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

CCA request time if you get worried.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry for the delay in responding. Life has got on top of me...

 

I've pasted this from further up the thread. CCAs were sent to all of them. I've noted what came back and where things are at now with each.

 

Capital One

Date of default 09/05/16

Default balance £566

Current balance £562

 

Replied with 'a reconstituted copy of your original agreement'. This did include a scanned copy of the signature page. Returned on 12th October 2016. He got a letter recently saying that this has been passed on to Lowell.

 

Lloyds

Date of default 10/06/16

Default balance £1555

Current balance £1553

 

Never replied to the CCA. Wrote this month to inform that they've sold the account to Robinson Way.

 

Barclaycard

Date of default 01/08/16

Default balance £590

Current balance £589

 

Also never replied to the CCA. As far as I know, we've heard nothing from them.

 

An unsecured loan:

 

Madison CF UK (118 Money) - taken out 22/07/2014

Opening balance: £2905

Date of default 31/03/16

Default balance £3630

Current balance £3625

 

Didn't reply either. Again, nothing from them to my knowledge.

 

An account with some kind of 'buy-now-pay-later' catalogue

 

Shop direct finance

This is showing as not in default - oddly,

this is showing as no account information in recent months (since Stepchange got involved) on noodle

Current balance £2493

 

He received a reply from this one, which said an application was made through their website using an online form and terms and conditions were accepted by ticking a box. A standard issue credit agreement has been printed off and enclosed. This is the account that has been passed to Lowell, and was the subject of the 'pre-legal assessment' letter I mentioned above.

 

The last token payments through stepchange were made in December of last year.

 

Is there any value in re-sending CCAs? Or should I just keep filing the letters away and hoping 5 more years will pass as the last one has?

 

Any advice welcomed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wold expect the lowells ones have been SOLD not passed on.

so a CCA request on those two yes.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Let me start by saying how thankful I am to this site and the knowledgeable posters who are always so quick to assist.

 

It is so much appreciated!

 

The letters continue to arrive and a somewhat worrying one came on 31st December

(I know I should probably not have left my query this long...)

 

It's a letter of claim from Lowell Solicitors in respect to the shop direct account with a balance of £2487.

 

They say they are going to issue a claim without further reference to my partner.

 

I never did send the CCA, and feel v stupid about that now.

 

Should I do that today with urgency?

 

What is likely to happen next?

 

Thanks for your advice, as always...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I will send it today.

 

Do you know which section of the act this account would fall under?

 

It wasn't a credit card, looks like it was some kind of finance on goods but as it wasn't my debt it's hard to know.

 

The original creditor was 'shop direct finance company limited' and it seems it was taken out online at very.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

read the posts under the CCA request link

 

if its a pre action protocol letter like here

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?481827-The-Pre-Action-Protocol-for-Debt-Claims-is-made-by-the-Master-of-the-Rolls-as-Head-of-Civil-Justice.-1st-Oct-2017

 

you need to read and follow post 6 in the above

 

just reword where it says credit card to shop direct mail order account

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx100uk, it does seem like it was one of these.

 

So I should send the CCA today with the form filled in as described in the linked post?

 

Can't believe I have left this longer than the prescribed 30 days! That is likely to make things worse I fear...

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesn't matter.

 

so PAP response form in post 6 of that thread

and

CCA request

 

1st class post today

use free proof of posting from the PO counter when you get the £1PO for the CCA request

 

don't forget..DO NOT SIGN ANYTHING

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the same situation as your other half due to family situation and long term illness from work so my disposable income plummented ,

 

I offered f & F to everyone explaning the situation and said this is the offer take it or leave it

 

2 did other did not but with the risk that I would be paying them £1 a month .

It take some doing

 

but the first thing to do is do a I & E form like on the nation debt helpline and then you can see what disposable income he has .

 

As long as the debts are solely in his name then its his income you put done and if it comes down to it all he can offer is £1 month then that's all they get . Also stay off the phone .

 

Put is bluntly no one can get blood out of a stone .

But believe me when you get it all sorted it is such a weight lifted from your shoulders

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have filled in name & address, boxes D&I, & printed name only.

 

Written a separate list of the documents required (no room on the form)

 

Do I staple both of these to the CCA letter & send all together?

 

Lowell sols are the same address as lowells so yes

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So I did this and a week ago had something back from Lowell Solicitors...

 

'Please find enclosed a copy of the agreement, statement, screenshot of the default notice and notice of assignment as requested from the original creditor.

 

We have suspended activity on the account for 30 days to allow you time to contact us with your intentions towards the above balance.

 

If no response is received, a County Court Claim form may be issued incurring costs. If you do not respond to the Claim we may apply for a County Court Judgement (CCJ) which could impact any future credit applications, etc...'

 

Enclosed was a letter introducting Lowell (July 2017), a indecipherable screenshot of something printed in green on a black background, and a copy of the credit agreement (unsigned). There is nothing detailing the payments made on the account, which I'm sure was one of things requested.

 

The original credit limit was £1000. The balance now stands at £2487.09.

 

Does anyone have some advice on what we should do next?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the agreement wont be signed will it

you signed up online?

 

but that's all std stuff they can download even from this site and type you husbands name on to it.

 

no default notice either

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no its a screen shot of some computer data screen

but it wont wash as a default notice

 

they've tried that grab a screen act = proof of a DN before and failed.

 

if you use our search CAG box of the red top toolbar

 

you'll find them

 

something like

 

Lowell claimform cat debt

 

look for other attachments in posts like a claimant witness statement ...CCA return or CPR return

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well my reaction to what they sent was it seemed insufficient compared to what I asked for but then again I have no frame of reference for what I should be expecting.

 

I know I asked for details of the payments made on the account (it was originally for £1k and now is in excess of £2k and payments were made for a while at least).

 

According to their letter, the account is currently on hold, but they MAY file a claim etc etc.

 

Should I just wait it out and see if any further communications arrive?

Or reply and point out what is still missing from the list of things I asked for?

Or something else entirely?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

no you don't reply

 

 

might help to sar shop direct

lets see what all this extra stuff is

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have read the linked post on SARs.

 

I notice it says...

 

'if you have moved since taking out 'whatever' you are sending the SAR for

you should include a list of your addresses from the time of taking out the 'whatever'

 

and if you have moved

its worthy to include a copy of your current CTAX bill

to prove who and where you are now.'

 

My partner has moved a few times since this was taken out in 2013. He should include all addresses? This house / all bills here are in my name only. What can / should he include instead of the c-tax bill by way of proof of address / identity?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...