Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2188 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

A friend of mine let a DCBL bailiff into her home ( it was 6am, they looked like cops and they pushed into the doorway when the door was opened)

 

They waived a Writ of Control to justify entry and refusal to leave.

 

They now have a list of goods under control - one of these is a computer. While I understand they can take the computer, what is the status of the data stored on the machine?

 

In the meantime, I've applied for a N244 to create a payment schedule as she is vulnerable on health grounds (also the reason for not being able to pay the original CCJ that started all this)

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats the CCJ all about?

 

not a parking charge I hope?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah so business to business debt

so the property they entered without being invited into was a business property?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can take the pc but must return the hard drive.

This is because

A.. Microsoft windows is a licensed to use product, you dont actually own it, just have the rights to use it and

B personal data, pictures documents cannot be siezed

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the PC is stuff all to do with the business they cant touch anything...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

A friend of mine let a DCBL bailiff into her home ( it was 6am, they looked like cops and they pushed into the doorway when the door was opened)

 

They waived a Writ of Control to justify entry and refusal to leave.

 

They now have a list of goods under control - one of these is a computer. While I understand they can take the computer, what is the status of the data stored on the machine?

 

In the meantime, I've applied for a N244 to create a payment schedule as she is vulnerable on health grounds (also the reason for not being able to pay the original CCJ that started all this)

 

An application to 'set aside' is not often accepted but as the application has been made, it is best to wait a while to comment further. When was the N244 submitted?

 

I am assuming that no payment was made to DCBL?

 

How much is the debt and what charges have been applied?

 

What goods have been listed on the Controlled Goods Agreement?

 

You mention that your friend is 'vulnerable' (on health grounds). Was any evidence provided to DCBL when they attended?

Link to post
Share on other sites

n245 vary the judgement might be better.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow - Thank you for all of your advice

 

The CCJ debt is £4,207

 

1 - She is a sole trader (freelance designer) working from home

 

2 - The N244 was submitted by hand at the High Court in the Strand explaining why payment has not been made (ill health and not able to work)

 

3 - The left a bill for £1111.20 ( an Enforcement Stage Fee) plus £90 ( Compliance Stage Fee)

 

4 - Goods listed on the Agreement are mostly of little value ( a TV ) - the rest are stuff related to work (PC and other tools) - Have invoices for the tools, the PC is old - I've had a solicitor countersign a declaration stating its not her's to lose

 

5 - It makes little sense to lose the tools, she wants to pay but needs the means to pay, which is what I've stated on the N244

 

6 - She is recently out of hospital, the discharge notes are a) attached to the N244 and were shown to the Bailiffs

 

Phew!

Edited by SpilshySploshy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Has your friend informed DCBL of the N244 Application?

 

Has the creditor been informed?

 

Has the creditor been made aware of the ill health of your friend?

 

Does your friend live in the London area? (just wondering why the 'set aside' application was taken to the High Court in the Strand?)

 

Did the enforcement officer indicate whether or when he would be re-attending?

 

PS: With the pending N244 application and the ill health of your friend (coupled with the fact that very few items have been taken into control) it is probably not worth complaining about the fees charged at this present time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've Replied in Quote - Thanks

 

Has your friend informed DCBL of the N244 Application?

 

- Not yet, I felt it best to wait to hear from the court

Has the creditor been informed?

 

- As above

 

Has the creditor been made aware of the ill health of your friend?

 

- Not yet

 

Does your friend live in the London area? (just wondering why the 'set aside' application was taken to the High Court in the Strand?)

 

- Yes

 

Did the enforcement officer indicate whether or when he would be re-attending?

- A vague threat this morning to come back and bump up the fees

 

PS: With the pending N244 application and the ill health of your friend (coupled with the fact that very few items have been taken into control) it is probably not worth complaining about the fees charged at this present time.

 

- Understood

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you asked for a set a side on the n244 ?

 

" In the meantime, I've applied for a N244 to create a payment schedule "

 

N245 is the correct form as per post #8 above .

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

In the meantime, I've applied for a N244 to create a payment schedule as she is vulnerable on health grounds (also the reason for not being able to pay the original CCJ that started all this)

 

Is there a reason why you decided to submit a 'set aside' application as opposed to an application to 'vary' the court order by way of an N245?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a reason why you decided to submit a 'set aside' application as opposed to an application to 'vary' the court order by way of an N245?

 

They have not submitted an N244 to set a side...they submitted an application to set a payment arrangement BA..only you have referred to it being an application to set a side ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

I was advised by a bailiff advice service to file a N244 with the wording "The applicant applies to the court to stay the writ"

 

I'm guessing I will need to get a N245 in place asking for a hearing to have a payment schedule put into place.

 

My only worry is the bailiffs knocking on her door while I'm getting it sorted

Link to post
Share on other sites

The N245 should have also been used to Stay the Writ....along with arranging a payment plan.

 

No need for the N244

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

That site you used wants closing down!!

Hope you didn't have to pay to get that useless n244 advice???

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again - I will get the N245 submitted ASAP

 

We paid £50 to submit the N244 but no other fees, thank goodness.

 

Does a N245 submission normally lead to a hearing with a judge?

 

No ......the court informs the claimant of your offer..they can accept or reject...the court can set payment level of its own accord...or very rarely the claimant can insist on a hearing...but that another procedure for the claimant to action.

 

The N245 is £50..obviously this well versed website has given you the wrong form number.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, got to come in here. Splishy, the N244 is absolutely fine to use - it's a general application form that's used for stays, set-asides, variations and warrant suspensions. You don't need to spend another £50 on an N245.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, got to come in here. Splishy, the N244 is absolutely fine to use - it's a general application form that's used for stays, set-asides, variations and warrant suspensions. You don't need to spend another £50 on an N245.

 

But if you wish to use it instead of the official N245...its will cost you £100 without hearing....better use the proper form...its cheaper.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...