Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • nothing you can do can product against the very rare judge lottery syndrome.
    • not sure why you added the blue line I've highlighted? that's no in the we gave you.   as for your question... PRAC's roboclaim computer knows when the account was taken out, after all it raised the claim and checked everything carefully first before issuing the request via northants bulk courts equally inept roboclaim computer... 
    • I've been researching in preparation of compiling my particularised defence/WS.    I'm none too happy that some judges still seem to be siding with DCAs and seemingly brushing aside anything that we have assumed to be "necessary" for DCAs to have a winning case.    Reading a recent "summary" from another poster (another thread with case similar to mine - very old, illegible application form, no default notice, reliance on their own software to prove it was ever sent) and the judgment made in favour of the DCA and even suggesting that there was no "agreement with the DCA, they simply owned the debt, not the agreement"  Makes me very nervous.    Especially if cases like this will be judged on "probability" - the probability that if I signed the original application form, then I must have taken out the credit card and racked up the alleged debt as shown in statements enclosed in their WS (and dated some ten years later).   Is it ok to post some "evidence" I've found from elsewhere?    This is in line with my fears that regardless of how hard one tries to rebut the "lack of evidence" produced by DCAs for chasing these very old "alleged" debts, it does appear to come down to the luck of what judge you get on the day and how much they can be swayed by the DCA solicitor.    A quick Google search produced the following - from one case - this related to a credit agreement - which resulted in someone being made bankrupt - that person appealed the bankruptcy order on the grounds of defective credit agreement and default notice and this was the appeal judge's decision:   The necessary formalities for the entry into the regulated consumer credit agreement (which related to the debt in issue) were not complied with; The default notice served in respect of that credit agreement was defective.   The First Ground The Appellant argued that she did not receive the terms and conditions when she entered into the credit agreement and, accordingly, section 61 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (“CCA”) had not been complied with and the agreement could not be enforced. The agreement had been entered in 1995 and, whilst it had provided a microfiche copy of the front page of the application, the Respondent had been unable to provide a copy of the terms.   Despite the terms not being produced, the District Judge had found that, in the circumstances, it was very likely that such terms existed and would have been provided to the Appellant when she entered into the Agreement. Mr Justice Mann held that this was a finding that the District Judge was entitled to make.   Further, Mr Justice Mann found that it was implicit from the District Judge’s findings that she considered that the terms and conditions not only existed but had been subscribed to by the Appellant’s signature and, consequently, the requirements of section 61 CCA were fulfilled. Mr Justice Mann held that this was also a justifiable finding which should not be interfered with on appeal.   The Second Ground The Appellant also argued that the default notice upon which the Respondent relied did not comply with the Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notice) Regulations 1989 because it stated the full balance of the account rather than the total of the missed payments. The Respondent argued that, as a result of the missed payments, it was contractually entitled to the entire balance subject to the service of the appropriate notice, a requirement which was fulfilled by the default notice itself and, consequently, the sum required to remedy the breach was the entire amount.   Mr Justice Mann agreed with the Respondent and the District Judge, holding that: “If by the time the default notice is served circumstances have arisen which entitle the lender to recover not merely sums which might be regarded as arrears, by which I assume is meant accumulated minimum payments, but also the whole of the sum, then they are entitled to claim that sum, and the sum to require to remedy the breach for non-payment of that sum is the payment of the whole sum due. The bank is not confined, at that stage, to claiming merely the amount of arrears if it has an accrued contractual right to have the whole of the sum.”   Do judgments like these not mean that a lot of what you guys do on here (and for which I and many others are VERY grateful) somewhat redundant. What is happening to judges just accepting "well, the terms must have been there if you signed it" -    Feeling quite nervous now.
    • we know it wasn't done to avoid enforcement we understand completely. but that doesn't take from away the fact that it happened   you can't appeal the pcn's on the basis that 'it was not his vehicle to levy upon'. the law clearly states otherwise.          
    • here is a question for you, is yu house divided up into a retail/business area  and domestic area for business rates purposes? If not why on earth are you paying business water rates? ceertainly not for tax purposes as you can claim any legit expense without having to reclassify your home as a business premises. i would be stopping this nonsense and goping back to whatever water supplier is the domestic one for your area. there is stuff all they can do to get the £40 from you whan you do that.
  • Our picks

Kaily

Savings have gone over £6000

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 383 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi

I am on ESA and PIP. My savings have just gone over the £6000 threshold in the last couple of months.

Is it best to phone DWP or should I write to them please?

This is causing me great anxiety as I feel like I have done something wrong. I am very thrifty so hardly spend any money preferring to save it as it makes me feel safe to know it is in the bank. I am a very insecure person with lots of struggles with mental health searching for some sort of security.

Please advise-thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have saving over £6,000 then the amount that you get starts to go down until you reach £16,000 whereby you will not receive any benefit.

 

 

Your income and savings

 

Your income may affect your income-related or contribution-based ESA. Income can include:

 

you and your partner’s income

 

savings over £6,000

 

pension income

 

You won’t qualify for income-related ESA if you have savings over £16,000.

 

https://www.gov.uk/employment-support-allowance/eligibility

 

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy.

Should I phone DWP or just send them a letter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Phone call will suffice.......but could you not spend and treat yourself.....new furniture or UHD TV ? :-)


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Phone call will suffice.......but could you not spend and treat yourself.....new furniture or UHD TV ? :-)

 

Thanks again.

 

I am concerned that at a later date they might ask why I spent it-dispersal of funds or something. Just don't know what is allowed and whats not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They have no control on your spending nor is it any of their business...as along as your below the threshold.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PIP is given for you to spend on whatever will help YOU. You may need to replace your car so that you can get out and about, or spend money on taxi's. You may want to get some help in to clean your house for you or look after your garden. Have a new bathroom fitted to make your life easier. You may need to buy a new bed, TV, cooker, washing machine etc. I would take out £500 each time you are getting near the £6,000 so that you have cash available to be able to treat yourself whenever you want to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They have no control on your spending nor is it any of their business...as along as your below the threshold.

 

Kind of. I mean, obviously they can't stop you spending your own money as you see fit, but there is potentially an issue of Deprivation of Capital to consider. Basically, a claimant has deprived themselves of capital if they knowingly spend money on non-essential items with the intention of securing or increasing benefit entitlement. If the DWP decides that this applies, they will treat you as if you still have the money when working out your payments.

 

Each case is treated on its merits, so it's not possible to give a comprehensive list of what is or isn't acceptable. Generally speaking repairs or replacements for old cars, furniture or household repairs would be OK. Paying off overdue debt is also OK, but probably not paying debt off early.

 

Deprivation is a consideration for ESA only, PIP is not affected by capital at all. If the capital is a result of benefit payments being saved, it can be disregarded for 52 weeks.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Deprivation is a consideration for ESA only, PIP is not affected by capital at all. If the capital is a result of benefit payments being saved, it can be disregarded for 52 weeks.

 

Thanks for the replies.

The money is from benefit payments being saved. Does that mean I can save it? Sorry a little confused what you mean.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Going on the above that would depend if you have saved it from your ESA or your PIP......do you save separately:-)


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, sorry - my last sentence wasn't very clear. They are two separate ideas.

 

PIP is not means tested and does not take capital into account. So you can have any amount of capital, from any source, and do whatever you want with it and your PIP payments will not be affected.

 

Now for ESA, that's where deprivation comes into play, assuming your ESA is Income Related. If the money you have saved is from benefits (of any type) then the DWP will ignore it for 52 weeks after it is paid to you. In other words, they won't start reducing your benefit payments based on it until you've had it for a year. Edit: This part is not correct: see my post below.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, disregard that last part of my post. As far as I can see from the DMG it is only arrears of benefit that are disregarded. So if your savings have gone over £6000 you would need to declare this and deprivation could be an issue if you spend the money with the intention of getting yourself under the limit.

 

One other thing we need to be clear about: deprivation is not fraud or any other sort of crime. It's just something that affects entitlement.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

So does that mean for now I don't need to inform them I have gone over the threshold as it has only been a couple of months?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry, disregard that last part of my post. As far as I can see from the DMG it is only arrears of benefit that are disregarded. So if your savings have gone over £6000 you would need to declare this and deprivation could be an issue if you spend the money with the intention of getting yourself under the limit.

 

One other thing we need to be clear about: deprivation is not fraud or any other sort of crime. It's just something that affects entitlement.

 

Oh ok thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, sorry about the mistake. You should tell them ASAP. If you're worried about it, bear in mind that the sooner they find out the better for you. You'll have less stress about the situation and any overpayment will be minimised.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the clarification antone


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think what this thread shows is it is better to keep below threshold if only by a pound and spend without worry, rather than go above the threshold and face a potential headache.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending on your area, you may be switched to universal credit if you do report a change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Depending on your area, you may be switched to universal credit if you do report a change.

 

I thought they would just adjust my payments accordingly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how about some new shoes or a weekend away somewhere. All that is allowable. If your only income is benefits of one sort or anothe rthye ahve calculated what is the minimum you need to live on so stop scrimping and saving if that means going without what others would consider necessities. A nice hair cut once in a while or a meal out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought they would just adjust my payments accordingly.

 

Not now. Some areas are universal credit only, which means if you report a change, you'll be moved over. And some people are finding they're now worse off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Better to just spend some money.....stop saving and keep your head down :wink:

 

Far easier


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would you wish to keep savings in a bank account, as far as I'm concerned you'd be better off with it below your mattress as interest is miniscule on savings accounts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why would you wish to keep savings in a bank account, as far as I'm concerned you'd be better off with it below your mattress as interest is miniscule on savings accounts.

 

Don't you worry about burglars?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never have trusted banks Kaily! ;).

 

On a serious note, you should have your savings working for you rather than your bank.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...