Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Tangliss, if you can't upload the letter, could you tell us what the heading is please? My understanding is it should say 'Letter before claim' or similar. HB
    • Do you think I should send the CCA request now then instead of waiting? I really can do without the stress. Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you for responding.
    • How was the "receiver" appointed and what is their role? Appointed by the lender under the terms of their security on the loan (sometimes referred to as "LPA Receiver")? Or are they acting for you in insolveny? What's the current role of the agent?
    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Claimform - old/unkown Orange Claim


BBBAAA
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2171 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I need some help please. I have been receiving letters from Lowell portfolio about a mobile phone debt that I do not recognise. I wrote to them and asked them to supply information including the agreement so I could understand where this debt came from.

 

They did not send me the agreement, they only sent me some figures typed out which had my name and an old address at the top.

 

A couple of months pass and I receive a letter before action from Cohen Cramer solicitors, which I sent a CPR letter in response asking for proof of the debt. I again received no agreement.

 

I received a claim form a couple of weeks ago which I acknowledged.

 

I am really really worried about this now - can they actually get a ccj against me even though I’ve disputed the debt and asked them for proof.

 

If I pay the amount now will it still go to court. Will they discontinue the claim if I pay now?

 

Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

DO NOT simply pay up, have you checked your credit files?

 

Have you ever had a mobile phone with the company they're claiming you owe?

 

Did you say that you were going to defend this on Mcol?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Please find info below.

 

I have had a mobile phone with Orange but way back in like 2005-2006 and it was disconnected and moved to another network.

 

I have said I was going to defend the claim on MCOL.

 

 

Name of the Claimant ? LOWELL PORTFOLIO

Date of issue – 29TH MARCH

 

What is the claim for;

 

1.The claim is for the sum of £xxx.xx due by the defendant under an Orange account with an account reference xxxxxxxx

 

2.The defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required under the terms of the the account agreement.

 

3.The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 23/12/2014, notice of which has been given to the defendant.

 

4.The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £xx.xx

 

5 The claimant claims the sum of £xxx.xx

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? YES

 

What is the value of the claim? £330

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? MOBILE PHONE ACCOUNT

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? AFTER

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DEBT PURCHASER

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not originally however this has been sent in response to my CPR letter

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? NO

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? NO

 

Why did you cease payments? I AM NOT AWARE OF THIS ACCOUNT.

 

What was the date of your last payment? UNKNOWN

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? NO

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planicon? NO

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

can you call orange and find out the last payment date for this account as

 

you say you acknowledged the claim did you state your intention to defend?

 

when you acknowledged did you send a cca and cpr?

 

also can you redact and upload everything you have received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check your credit file, see if anything is on there.

 

Hopefully lowlifes have picked up a lemon and will get their fingers burnt, and you can claim expenses dealing with their nonsense.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no please upload as ONE multipage PDF:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

Please find attached all documents so far in relation to this. The statement of account they sent is very vague and doesn’t allow me to verify anything at all.

 

They’ve not sent the agreement, which they will need in court?

 

Thank you for taking the time to look at this for me!

BBBAAA files.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m not sure. I have had accounts with EE in the past but I don’t recognise this account. I had an account with t mobile back in 2005-2006 but I don’t know anything about this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't worry about your defence yet its no due till the 27th

 

you say this was sent to your old address?

when did you move out?

and when do thet claim this account was opened?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick one, I didn’t request a default notice in my cpr letter. Do you think I should ask for one?

 

I lived in this address for a few months in 2010 - obviously moving out way before the suggested start date of this agreement.

 

I appreciate that there are loads of sample defences posted on this forum, however they are full of terminology I don’t really understand, any help writing my defence would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Already answered about the defence in post 21

 

So this account is fraud then

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe so. I do not have any reference to this on my credit file, they can’t produce an agreement.

 

I had accounts with associated companies and as far as I can see this account was set up and no payments were made to it at all so that does suggest it was set up fraudulently, however because I had accounts with associated companies perhaps it relates to one of those, hence why I don’t want to just bare face deny it, I don’t want to be accused of perjury.

 

I have billions of things going on right now which is why I just want to get this boxed off so I don’t have to worry about it.

 

When do you think it is an appropriate time to start formulating a defence?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...