Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you all   JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.   As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.   Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me. I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 
    • Are you saying that both businesses were closed? Yet you stayed there for over two hours. . If both were closed than to charge £100 is a penalty since Horizon had no legitimate interest in keeping spaces clear for the company. sake as there were no customers..
    • Well you would think that would be the case. Sadly i doubt there is one honest broker within the BPA or IPC and most of their members. they are there to take as much money as they can from motorists regardless of PoFA.   Take the Consideration  period for example. This is a minimum of 5 minutes to allow motorists to find a parking space, read the T&Cs giving them enough time to leave the car park without having to pay if they decide not stay. Simple. Well it would be simple if it were any other company than BPA [or IPC who have now fallen into line with BPA's "reasoning"].  You see if you decide to stay then despite the fact that during the Consideration period when you still weren't classed as parking , once you accept the terms [with all the underhand little tricks designed to trip you up] that five minutes is now included in your parking time. [No not the parking period because the poor dears who ANPR cameras are apparently unable to work out what the exact parking period is since their ever so infallible cameras [yeah right] are incapable of tracking cars once they are in a car park]. After 12 years they still haven't worked out a way of doing it. Some of them fudge and the majority [with a wink fro their ATA [Accredited Trade Association though it should be Discredited Trade Association] just ignore the parking period all together. This is what BPA claim is the Consideration period Entrance grace period: This is for when motorists enter a car park, read the signs and/or attempt to make payment then leave. In these instances, motorists must be offered a reasonable amount of time before an operator takes enforcement action, but we do not define this time, due to the variance in size and layout of car parks. An entrance grace period for a small, permit-only car park could be below 5 minutes, whereas for a large multi-story this could be 15. But  heaven forbid that anyone should leave 6 or 7 minutes after entering  their member's car parks. . They are dutybound to receive a PCN. This is regardless of how busy the car park would be [Christmas eve for example ] .Our minimum is their maximum. Moving on to Grace periods. Again BPA gobble degook. Exit grace period: This must be a minimum of 10 minutes and this is when a motorist intends to stay – for example, if you paid for an hour but spent a total of 1 hour 10 minutes on-site, you will not receive a PCN. It is important to note that the grace period is not a free period of parking however and should not be advertised as such. If that ten minutes in not free parking what is it. their members all think they can send out PCNs for anything after 1 minute after the exact time never mind ten minutes. Our snotty letters have stood the test of time. Do not try to reinvent the wheel -especially with DCBL . They don't even know what a non compliant PCN is for goodness sake! You already know more about PoFA then they do. However if you include that they will find a way to disabuse the Judge of your logic and the law. So don't give them the chance.  I am sure you have the Parking Prankster going on about the rogues misusing the rules on planning permission by lying and stating that they had "retrospective permission". There is no such thing in English law yet Judges were swallowing it until one Judge pulled up Parking Eye about one of their Witness Statements alluding to "rp" by claiming it was "tantamount to perjury".  It wasn't tantamount,it was plain and simple perjury. Parking Prankster: The great private car park planning approval scam PARKING-PRANKSTER.BLOGSPOT.COM Guest blog from shuteyepark, from the Consumer Action group forums In December 2013 my daughter received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) fro... Hope it wasn't too long winded Nicky Boy.🙂
    • and more immediate issues WT* is the UK doing. Ukraine needs these funds and weapons NOW Lets sincerely hope this isnt another Tory VIPal skimming issue.   MoD accused of ‘go-slow’ with half of £900m Ukraine fund unused | Defence policy | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Delays mean just £404m of the money donated by nine countries has been committed or spent  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BMW 320i with Centurion Warranties


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2196 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I'm after a bit of advice,

 

I've had my car 2 and a half months and the engine has ceased due to a lack of oil getting into the engine.

 

It has had the engine removed by a BMW specialist and they have diagnosed that the oil pump has gone faulty as there is plenty of oil in the sump tank.

 

I have tried to claim this through warranty as the car requires a new/refurb engine.

 

The warranty company are finding every way under the sun not to pay out.

 

I'm 19 so I don't really know where I stand :???:

 

so some advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well now you start to understand some of the truth about extended warranties.

 

I'm assuming that this car was bought from a dealer? Please confirm and please tell us which dealer it was.

 

If you look at the Consumer Rights Act you will discover that the responsibility is with the seller and because you have had the car less than six months, there are entitled to attempt one repair and then if the repair fails, you are entitled by law to insist on a refund or replacement – at your option.

 

Who was the dealer?

Have you contacted the dealer about this? And what have they said?

You should start off by getting a written opinion from the BMW specialist and then we will help you with your options.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The car was bought from a dealer in Bryn, Wigan called Merit Motor Company.

 

I was hoping to get it sorted through warranty but as they are finding every way out of it I am going to ring the garage and explain the situation to them and tell them they have 1 chance of repairing the vehicle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should Hang on a minute if I were you.

 

We have told you what your legal rights are here. I would suggest that you don't get into a conflict-oriented conversation with the garage at the moment. I suggest that you simply present them with the problem and say to them that as the car has only recently been purchased from them, you'd like them to repair it.

 

If they then start to fob you off then come back here and tell us what they said and then we will help you write them an appropriate letter and start to take control.

 

I don't think it's a good idea to start phoning and start blasting on about legal rights before you know that they're not going to be cooperative. You never know they might be excellent dealers.

 

How much did you buy the car for? How old is it? Did you pay extra for the extended warranty? Can you please let us know a bit more about what Centurion's excuses are

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. Trading standards amount to nothing. They don't deal with individual complaint such as yours.

 

Don't say anything to them unless you understand what it is you're saying because if you start bluffing you will be called out on it and then you will lose credibility.

 

Simply begin with a nice polite telephone call telling them the problem and asking them for their help. Read our customer services guide first. Implement the advice there.

 

I asked you to let us know why centurion were refusing to help – but you haven't responded. Please answer my questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, they were refusing to help because they was saying there was no way the problem could of occured so suddenly and that I should of notice that the engine wasn't getting oil to it. They said there should of been some indication such as warning lights but nothing had come up on the dashboard. They also said that I should of heard the engine begin to knock but I heard nothing on the last journey in the car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Have you been communicating in writing or is this all on the telephone? If it is in writing, please can you post up their letter in PDF format.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the excuses you have received from centurion are simply verbal.

 

I think you need to get a paper trail going urgently. Write an email to centurion explaining to them exactly what has happened – giving them the detail and also the action that has been taken subsequently i.e., the inspection and the opinion of the vehicle inspector as to what has caused the problem.

Tell centurion that you want to make a claim and that they are free to inspect the vehicle at XXX address where it now is. Asked them if there are any forms which need to be completed and asked them to send them to you immediately.

 

Tell them that you are very disappointed that you have already called them and that their first reaction was to deny any liability under warranty on spurious grounds. Tell them that you are waiting for the claim form by return and that you want the vehicle repaired by them as quickly as possible.

 

It is very important to be able to show that you have called them and what they have said to you. Because you have no recording, you are putting down in the email what their reaction was to you so that it is clear and if later on you have to take some slightly more serious action such as bringing a small claim in the County Court then you will have some evidence.

 

I'm suggesting that you take this action in respect of centurion simply in order to protect you and to give you a second string to your bow. However, the principal responsibility is with the dealer. Telephoned the dealer as I have already suggested and come back here and let us know what has been said. Record the call.

 

Who is it that recommended the centurion extended warranty?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a look at the centurion warranty.

 

If they stick to their position then I suppose that they are trying to rely on paragraph 15 and also paragraph 27.

 

I see that their paragraph 14 disclaims any reimbursement for repairs if you have not followed the correct claims procedure as detailed in your warranty agreement. This is an unfair contract term and it is unenforceable. Once the insured/assured risk has occurred then failure to carry out some administrative requirement in the contract will not relieve them of their liability.

Warranty Book 2016 F4.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

The warranty company have already been out to inspect the vehicle and it has been 2 weeks since the vehicle has been in the garage. It is upon the inspection that they have said that it's not tallying up and they are in talks with the director to see if they are paying out or not. The garage said about extending the warranty to 12 months for £250.

Edited by samandroid1998
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a look at the centurion warranty.

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]71349[/ATTACH]

If they stick to their position then I suppose that they are trying to rely on paragraph 15 and also paragraph 27.

 

I see that their paragraph 14 disclaims any reimbursement for repairs if you have not followed the correct claims procedure as detailed in your warranty agreement. This is an unfair contract term and it is unenforceable. Once the insured/assured risk has occurred then failure to carry out some administrative requirement in the contract will not relieve them of their liability.

 

Sorry I don't understand what you mean by the paragraph 14 section?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry. It doesn't apply to you. I'm just making a little criticism of their terms and conditions.

 

You haven't told me who it is recommended centurion?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hadn't realised that there had already been inspection. I gathered from you that there had simply been a conversation in which they had rejected your claim.

 

As they have carried out an inspection and the car has been in the garage for two weeks, I think you should send them an email – but not one I suggested earlier – telling them that the matter is now going on rather too long and you need a definitive answer. Tell them that you are very disappointed that their first reaction seems to be that they are disclaiming liability because of what you consider to be spurious grounds.

 

Tell them that you need an answer immediately.

 

At the same time, please start dealing with the garage as I have suggested above. This is extremely important. You need to get an answer from them as well.

 

Once we get the information back from the dealer and from centurion then we can consider the next step to take

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the people who sold you the car also recommended the warranty. I wonder if they got a commission out of it?

 

I suppose this could be helpful because that would mean that the dealers should realise that if centurion doesn't do the job, then they, the dealers will have to. This might help the dealer to put some pressure on centurion.

 

I hope you understand a bit that extended warranties generally speaking are a waste of money. You're much better relying on your statutory rights which could last you for up to 6 years depending on the problem that develops with the vehicle – or other item.

 

Extended warranties are really a bit of a con trick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, have you spoken with the dealers yet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you referring to the dealer Merit Motor Company or are you referring to the garage which currently has your car?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...