Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Just Received a response from eurogarages as below also received another chaser from met and another from debt recovery plus… What are your thoughts any help appreciated-  Good morning,   I have had a response from MET this morning.   MET have confirmed they will not be cancelling the charge this is because you parked in the carpark and went over to McDonalds.   Unfortunately there is nothing further that I can do and any further contact will need to go directly to [email protected]   Many thanks,   Heather Anne Christie  ‑  Starbucks Area Manager FTG Area/Regionals   [email protected]  
    • From BPA Code of Practice Section 17:  Keying Errors B) Major Keying Errors Examples of a major keying error could include: • Motorist entered their spouse’s car registration - if it was his spouse's car • Motorist entered something completely unrelated to their registration • Motorist made multiple keying errors (beyond one character being entered incorrectly) • Motorist has only entered a small part of their VRM, for example the first three digits In these instances we would expect that such errors are dealt with appropriately at the first appeal stage, especially if it can be proven that the motorist has paid for the parking event or that the motorist attempted to enter their VRM or were a legitimate user of the car park (eg a hospital patient or a patron of a restaurant).   I suspect this had something to do with it .... if so I guess he has to take it on the nose!
    • reading the order is quite difficult for me. this is a letter (names and addresses taken out) that i sent in which is what i assumed i needed too.   court.pdf
    • Thanks for the message jk2054   I have just been drafting what I want to say and I think its best to focus purely on the supremacy of contract. The reason being that I dont want the judge to start focusing on other parts of my witness statement when surely just the supremacy of contract section alone should be enough to get this dismissed.    The crux of my defense revolves around the principle of Supremacy of Contract. When I purchased my flat in December 2016, the contract explicitly included ownership of parking spot 112, as delineated in the lease documentation provided in Exhibit 1. This documentation unequivocally establishes my right to use and occupy this parking space. Furthermore, the subsequent exhibits, particularly Exhibit 3, clearly depict the marked boundaries of parking spot 112, corroborating my ownership as stated in the lease agreement. Additionally, the official register of title, presented in Exhibit 4, reinforces this ownership claim. Moreover, I draw the court's attention to relevant legal precedents, such as Pace v Mr N and Link Parking v Ms P, which demonstrate that parking companies cannot override a tenant's right to park on designated property. These cases serve as persuasive authorities supporting my argument regarding the Supremacy of Contract in residential parking disputes. It is my contention that the absence of any contractual obligation to display a permit for parking spot 112 absolves me of any liability in this matter. The claimant's failure to acknowledge my ownership rights in their witness statement further underscores the weakness of their case.
    • I agree with you LFI, a totally wrong decision, I may be wrong but IMO who was driving is irrelevant .... So what if he declared himself as the driver within 28 days? .... I may be wrong but it's my understanding that that just makes him liable for the charge as driver. The fact is, the driver, declared or not, only made the error of entering the wrong vehicle registration number .... The parking was paid for. I think it more likely the judge dismissed because he didn't appeal to the PPC and tell them about the error and confirm he paid giving the chance of rectifying the situation before it got to court. But we can only know if Dave962 clarifies. Pollux, is that a fish like Cod? 😁
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Estate Agent claiming full fee due despite early cancellation


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2136 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently entered a contract with an estate agent called Remax signing on the 21st of March 2018 due to the failure to get one visit booked within the first week whereby there was 350 online views and a failed attempt to cooperate with another estate agent to work together in selling the property.

 

I didn’t hear from the agent in a week and he didn’t respond to a message I sent him asking for an update. Hence, I decided to cancel and go with another agent.

 

This is the wording from the contract:

 

If you are a consumer client and this contract was not agreed within our premises you have the right to cancel this contract within 14 days without giving any reason.

The cancellation period will expire after 14 days from the day this contract was agreed.

 

To exercise the right to cancel, you must inform us of your decision to cancel this contract by sending us a clear statement in writing to: RE/MAX Right Step, 1b Hall Lane, London, E4 8HH or emailing us.

 

To meet the cancellation deadline, it is sufficient for you to send your communication concerning your exercise of the right to cancel before the cancellation period has expired.

 

If you choose to cancel the agency agreement, you will be required to pay for the services supplied prior to cancelation, such as For Sale boards, advertising, property particulars, Energy performance certificates etc.

 

Where we introduce or have negotiations with the ultimate purchaser of the property before you exercise your statutory right to cancel the contract, this contract will be deemed to have been fully performed and the agreed agency fee would be due, notwithstanding that cancellation took place.

 

Is this legally right given he was notified on 1 April 2018?

 

Thank you

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they performed any of the above ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where did you enter into the contract? Was it online, on the telephone or in their office?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so what exactly di you say in your letter of cancellation?

 

On the face of it you have abided by the terms laid out so what are they asking for (ie amount and reason)

 

I am assuming that this is a fixed fee agency rather than one that charges upon completion of the sale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Have they performed any of the above ?

 

They have yet to send me an invoice for their ‘services’ but are not referring to the notice of cancellation that was sent to their franchisee stating that they never received notification of cancellation.

 

The T&C’s state that it should be in writing to their head office or to their email.

 

I didn’t send it to their head office email but to the representative I.e. franchisee, twice by email.

 

They state that they are within their rights to invoice me and to claim commission on the sale of the property regardless of whether the buyer was from having seen the property marketed by them. I have written to the property ombudsmen who say they will review the case.

 

Where did you enter into the contract? Was it online, on the telephone or in their office?

 

Te contract was discussed over the phone and sent by email and returned signed by email to the representative I.e. franchisee.

 

REMAX draw the distinction between themselves and the franchisee stating that they are in control of the marketing and hence the notice of cancellation only is registered when sent directly to them.

 

so what exactly di you say in your letter of cancellation? On the face of it you have abided by the terms laid out so what are they asking for (ie amount and reason)

I am assuming that this is a fixed fee agency rather than one that charges upon completion of the sale.

 

The Cancellation of Contract stated the following:

 

Sunday, 1 April 2018

 

Re/Max Right Step Property

1b Hall Lane

London, E4 8HH

 

Dear (Estate Agent name)

Re: (property address)

I recently entered into a Sales Agency Agreement with yourself as sole agent on 21 March 2018 online by way of sending you an email ([email protected]).

 

In accordance with my rights under the Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013, and with the contract terms requesting cancellation within 14 days from signing,

 

I would like to cancel the contract on the basis that there hasn’t been any signs that your methods of marketing have yielded any serious potential buyers in the first week when the first three weeks are expected especially as this is a bank holiday weekend, to generate the most interest.

 

I also have had no communication from you all week despite assurances that you were to follow-up with Winkworths last Monday.

 

Furthermore, a competitor is offering a lower commission rate of 1.5% and is already representing properties in the block.

 

I require written confirmation from you that the contract has indeed been cancelled and that no payment will be claimed by you.

Yours faithfully,

Edited by dx100uk
Merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

as you have a copy of the email then they cant claim they havent got it.

 

That would be like saying they didnt get a letter because their guard dog ate it therefore you didnt send it.

 

In short they dont have a leg to stand on and no reason to claim anything from you for any reason.

 

They are just annoyed that they cant have some money for nothing

Link to post
Share on other sites

The outcome was?

 

 

The problem is the Contract was not signed on EA premises, so no 14 day cooling-off period.

Also bad move to suggest you want to cancel because another EA is prepared to offer a lower commission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrong way round Mariner

 

* Contracts signed in the agent’s office do not carry a right to cancel. Certain information must be provided to the consumer, clearly explaining this.

 

* A contract signed away from the agent’s premises, gives the seller a right to cancel and a cancellation notice must be given to the consumer, before the contract is signed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...