Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • honeybee13
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By honeybee13 · Posted

      Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Crazy Lou
      Dangerous non complete install Bt left us terminating our contract asking us £545 we haven’t terminated non one wil talk

      By Crazy Lou · Posted

      Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • Kyosanto
      Ryanair are delaying paying out the compensation for a delayed flight

      By Kyosanto · Posted

      There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • NewsBot
      Coach: US sues to block its parent merger with Michael Kors owner

      By NewsBot · Posted

      The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • dx100uk
      Lowell Claimform - Old Vanquis Card Debt - poss SB, - now N244 for SJ

      By dx100uk · Posted

      thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

DCBL got 2300gdp out of me over a PCM/Gladstones backdoor 2X pcn ccj..help get money back!!

RoxyandRuby1
 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2004 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

RoxyandRuby1

RoxyandRuby1

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Its all a bit slow dealing with Gladstones as you are well aware.

 

We asked them to forward all the correspondence pertaining to our claim and to contact the court regarding the CCJ and the fact that we have paid it.

 

They came back to us saying they needed confirmation from DCBL.

 

We have sent them another email today asking them if they have contacted DCBL yet.

 

We also contacted DCBL asking for the paperwork they allegedly sent to us.

 

He said they would email it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 147
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

dx100uk

dx100uk

Posted
Posted

stop using email!!

 

specifically state that any email addresses they hold for you are NOT to be used for anything to do with the court claim!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
ericsbrother

ericsbrother

Posted
Posted

have you got tyhe claim details from Northampton county court bulk centre yet?

Gladstones arent going to help you, they are the enemy and they stand to lose money by your actions.

 

It has been made clear that you need to see the original claim form and once you have that you can go after a set aside and then battle with PCM afterwards.

Link to post
Share on other sites
RoxyandRuby1

RoxyandRuby1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
have you got tyhe claim details from Northampton county court bulk centre yet?

Gladstones arent going to help you, they are the enemy and they stand to lose money by your actions.

 

It has been made clear that you need to see the original claim form and once you have that you can go after a set aside and then battle with PCM afterwards.

 

We have received the Particulars of claim from Northampton Court. I uploaded these in an earlier post.

 

I have downloaded and printed the N244 form and notes. We have contacted our local court and confirmed we can make the claim for a set aside from there as opposed to Northampton.

As our funds are depleted right now thanks to this we will have to wait until May to be able to pay the fee. Then we will go after a set aside.

 

Should we contact DCBL and Gladstones by registered or signed mail in the future?

WE will stop emailing immediately. We thought that that would be a way of proving a time line and a paper trail.

We do not have any paperwork as they did not send us any ever.

 

We want to get from DCBL the 7 day notice they say they sent us and proof that we have paid this money.

The court told us we need a letter from Gladstones to say we have paid the CCJ before they can say it has been satisfied for my husbands credit record. Gladstones say they need proof from DCBL before they can inform the court.

When my husband called DCBL they realised we did not even have a reference number from them. Needless to say we have not received copies of anything from them.

Whilst we realise they are the enemy. Surely there is a responsibility on their part to send us receipts of payment!

Link to post
Share on other sites
DragonFly1967

DragonFly1967

Posted
Posted

You should have been left with a receipt, never mind being sent one.

 

But, this is DCBL and Gladrags we're dealing with here, so don't expect anything to get done properly. DCBL seem to think that because they're "TV Stars" they can do pretty much anything they please and get away with it. And Gladrags believe that normal rules do not apply to them.

 

Gladrags probably know about this thread, so don't expect them to make life easy for you I'm afraid. This is going to be a fight and you're going to have to throw the first punch.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites
brassnecked

brassnecked

Posted
Posted

Good luck with this, they should not be allowed to get away with how they ruthlessly fleeced you. Would love to film a HCEO sent by yourselves to take the Office PC fom Gladrags and DCBL when you win and they don't pay up.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites
ericsbrother

ericsbrother

Posted
Posted

get the set aside and DCBL will have to refund you as they hold the money for a while in case of such things.

 

ultimately the parking co are laible for all of your costs so if the matter doesnt resolve itself at the set aside stage then PCM will be massively out of pocket as they subsidise everyone elses living

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
RoxyandRuby1

RoxyandRuby1

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Today we received a Payment Receipt from DCBL.

We also received a Notice of Enforcement. This claims we owed a debt of £773, with a compliance stage fee of £90 plus interest. This was a total of £864. 21. I am not sure how it increased to £2318 in a week.

 

It is also undated!

 

WE categorically have NEVER seen this notice of Enforcement before. I am so angry at these cheating barstewards!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
brassnecked

brassnecked

Posted
Posted

They will say the extra is Enforcement Fees for knocking on your door and bullying you into paying.probably

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites
dx100uk

dx100uk

Posted
Posted

ive hidden those

can you make sure you redact properly

then upload to ONE multipage PDF please

else we'll be here all night downloading single pages

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
ploddertom

ploddertom

Posted
Posted

Having had a look at the NoE I would say on the face of things it does appear to be Compliant although I would like answers to the following which may fill in some of the blanks.

 

1 - what address was this Notice sent to - your current address or the address your OH was living at at the time?

2 - what is the "Date of Notice issued"?

3 - going down to the Enforcement Details - what was the "Date of CCJ"?

4 - you initially said the Enforcement Agent turned up at 17:45hrs, can you remember what time you paid him & what time he left?

5 - have you asked DCBL for a breakdown of the fees charged and the reasons why they were charged? I don't have a problem over the Compliance or 1st Enforcement Stage Fees but they do need to justify anything on top of that which is approximately half of what you ended up paying.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Bailiff Advice

Bailiff Advice

Posted
Posted

I did wonder which part of the forum this thread was posted on.

 

The date of issue of the Notice of Enforcement is very important. It will be found in the address box area.

 

I am curious about the date when judgment had been entered. In one of the earlier posts a redacted copy is exhibited with the judgment date being shown as 10th January 2018. And yet; I can see on the Notice of Enforcement a different date of 6th March 2018.

Link to post
Share on other sites
RoxyandRuby1

RoxyandRuby1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Having had a look at the NoE I would say on the face of things it does appear to be Compliant although I would like answers to the following which may fill in some of the blanks.

 

1 - what address was this Notice sent to - your current address or the address your OH was living at at the time?

2 - what is the "Date of Notice issued"?

3 - going down to the Enforcement Details - what was the "Date of CCJ"?

4 - you initially said the Enforcement Agent turned up at 17:45hrs, can you remember what time you paid him & what time he left?

5 - have you asked DCBL for a breakdown of the fees charged and the reasons why they were charged? I don't have a problem over the Compliance or 1st Enforcement Stage Fees but they do need to justify anything on top of that which is approximately half of what you ended up paying.

 

1. Our current address but we did not receive it, when we mentioned this on the phone the DCBL employee quipped 'blame the post then'

 

2. 08.03.2018

 

3. 10.01.2018 but Judgement date was 06.03.2018

 

4. He has written on the 'Notice that goods have been removed....' 17.40 but I think it was around 18.30

 

5.I have not yet, I wanted to see if you advised me to, I will send a letter asking them that today.

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...