Jump to content
style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 195 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

My GP has said I'm fit to return to work and has signed a sick note to this effect, but my employer's OH doctor recommends my employer commissions a report from a neuro psychologist prior to any return.

 

As I'm fit to return I do not believe I should have to take any delay as annual leave and it can't be classed as sick leave, as I'm considered fit to work. What is the solution? Would this be "garden" leave?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they said it will be annual leave ?

 

Normally in this situation, a company will just pay you as normal similar to garden leave and you return to work when the employers OH are satisfied that you are safe to return to work. The reason it would not be annual leave, is that from a health and wellbeing point of view it would not be sensible or good practice to see your holiday time eaten up. You will need leave time during the year, so you have opportunity to recharge your batteries during the working year.

 

Suggest you contact your employers line manager to discuss and obtain written confirmation of the exact position.

Edited by dx100uk
quote

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"garden leave" is when you are not working yoru notice but need to be available

 

this is "medical suspension" and most organisations would resume wages


Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check in your Employment Contract for anything on Sicknesss/illness/Capability also check the Company Employees Handbook if they have one.

 

Are they using their Capability Policy???

 

1. When did you start employment with this Company?

 

2. How long have you been Employed with this Company to date?


How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So far HR haven't defined on what basis this period will be. I've been continuously employed with them for 20 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

are you currently being paid sick leave? if so i wouldnt expect that to change. If not then it can be read as you are currently suspended pending the outcome of a medical and they should pay you as they would be obliged to do so for any other reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As it's the Easter weekend it's too soon for HR to have communicated with me so unable to respond with any detail. I hope to be hearing something this next week so shall post HRs response.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so you dont know if you are currently being paid then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should be on full pay until mid April.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the it will continue until they have done their deliberations. If they then refuse to let you return to work they should start proceeding to dismiss you on capability grounds or arrange a return t work in some graded return scheme agreed by OH and yourself. ita may be light duties or shorter hours but they cant do nothing and refuse to pay you,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let everyone know I am still awaiting a response from my employers HR department.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a letter stating I would be on half pay from now on. @phoned HR but the person I need to speak to is on leave.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Received a letter stating I would be on half pay from now on. @phoned HR but the person I need to speak to is on leave.

 

 

Dear company,

 

as you are aware my doctor has signed me on as fit to work

 

I have been waiting for X weeks at your request for an additional medical check. I am fit and fully able to resume duties, yet about to be put on half pay.

 

This feels discriminatory. Please confirm I am in fact on medical suspension at your request and will continue to receive full pay, or confirm I can recommence duties immediately.

 

Yours,

 

you.


Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More news on this.

 

Today I received an email from HR. They say I am now on half pay because the Occupational Health doctor's recommendation that I have a psychological assessment, takes precedence over my GP who maintains I am medically fit to return to work on a phased return.

 

In addition it has been 17 days since my employer received the OH report and the recommendation but today they are finally making the actual referral.

 

I now feel compelled to seek legal advice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they think you have a mental health concern going in heavy handed may simply confirm their prejudice. I would send the letter first....

  • Haha 1

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An update.

 

I'm on half pay while awaiting the psychological assessment suggested by the OH doctor.

 

My employer says it would be too risky for me to return to the workplace without back to work suggestions from the psychologist (I've only had a stroke six months ago!).

 

Despite my argument that this is medical suspension and my GP saying I'm fit to return, my employer has overruled my GP.

My union say I have no option than to go along with what's happening and see my GP to ask him to say I'm sick with work related stress..

Edited by dx100uk
spacing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what good will seeing your GP do?

 

push hard, very day, for that OH appointment. Not having it is costing you.


Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I might make an observation that had not been contributed hitherto, but which will cast some light on the subject,

 

whilst in no way suggesting that the employer is "morally correct", it should be pointed out that they are legally correct and the OP is laboring under a misapprehension that they have been signed as fit for work by their doctor.

According to what the OP says here, that is not what the GP has said.

 

"Fit for work" means returning 100% to your full job with all duties and hours. That is not what the GP said.

The for note must therefore say "may be fit for work on a phased return" or words to that effect.

 

That is ADVICE to the employer, so they are not refusing to accept the GP diagnosis or overruling it.

They are simply choosing not to comply with the advice.

 

In order for this to be a medical suspension, the employer must refuse permission to return to the FULL job in all its glory.

If the GP is willing to provide a fit note that says they are fully fit with no exceptions, then if the employer ignores that it becomes a medical suspension.

The unions hands are tied at the moment. The employer is legally correct.

Edited by sangie5952
spacing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sangie595 - my fit note says I'm to return on a phased basis though, as you say, my employer has overruled the GP's opinion and has a right to do so. However, the OH doctor who suggested a neuropsychological assessment following my stroke could be carried out concurrently with a return to the workplace. The employer has chosen not to do this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And that's the problem - they have a right to do so.

The OH doctor also only gives advice.

 

I don't know if it's an agenda, or just being super cautious.

I don't have the information to make an informed guess about that.

 

What I can say is that the employer is acting within the law.

Nothing there to see ... Yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oddly enough my employer has now "allowed" a phased return prior to the completion of the neuropsycholoical assessment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Further update

 

For some strange reason my employer is now allowing me back on a phased basis prior to the neuropsychological assessment. I'm unsure what to think about this! At least my return will put me back on full pay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to be the bearer of bad news,

but are you sure it does that?

 

Many employers did not pay full pay on a phased return

- they pay the rate that is earned,

so if you work half the week,

you get half the pay.

 

Many people don't notice that is the case because they have company sick pay,

and that makes up the balance.

 

In effect they are being paid part salary and pay sick pay.

 

If you have sick pay,

it amounts to the same pay so nobody notices or cares.

 

But since your company sick pay had run out,

it might not be full pay unless your terms specify that.

You need to check

- don't assume.

Edited by sangie5952
spacing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I intend to represent myself at a tribunal if the initial intervention of ACAS fails. I'm seeking £1600 of deductions from my salary that my employer took and is a failure of adhering to their own policy.

 

I don't feel it's worth employing a legal representative and want to do it myself but would appreciate any tips.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?





  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Would that be the head of council for where I lived at that time, or where I live now? I moved areas in 2011. Thanks
    • I send copies of my letters to Lowell too as evidence? 
    • Email and call your local elected councillor,/ elected head of council. There is a better than 50 % chance that they will be able to sort this out immediately, in fact considering your circumstances, 90%.  They will also likely be working over the long weekend. You should be able to find their email / mobile number on Google.   Your local councillor will have the immediatee power to stop this in it's tracks, and can overide any obnoxious Council tax employee, or Bailiff.
    • Who were the organisers of the raffle? What cause or organisation was the raffle in aid of? I'm not aware of recent case law but I expect these kinds of questions have come up a lot with the huge increase in online gambling et cetera. Personally I have always thought that the notion of "intention to create legal relations" is a fairly dated idea and although I'm sure it does have relevance nowadays, I'm pretty certain that it is a concept which is easy to overcome. If this raffle was clearly held by some nonprofit organisation for a cause like your local school and it was basically being run by parents and pupils then I think the tenancy would be to say that there might not have been any intention to create legal relations. If this is an organisation where the people who run it are being paid salaries for running the organisation and also running the raffle – and also if the raffle is not directed simply as a pretty small defined groups such as the parents and children at a school, then my tenancy would be to say that it is a binding contract. So a couple more answers please
  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
    • 30 Day Right To Reject - Vehicle Casualty Report. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415585-30-day-right-to-reject-vehicle-casualty-report/
      • 57 replies
×
×
  • Create New...