Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is an article from a couple of years ago about how someone won against the council, but it does mention that there are two sets of signs.   https://www.dailypost.co.uk/business/business-news/driver-wins-appeal-over-mersey-13931137   HB
    • Let them go back to court and then force them to produce everything they wont.
    • Impotrant   https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/UKHMCTS/bulletins/24c3af1 How will the new process work? The process for applying for a warrant of control will remain the same; creditors will continue to use the existing application routes of either a paper application form via a local court or an electronic application on Money Claim Online (MCOL). Following a successful application, the warrant is issued to the relevant Warrant of Control Support Centre. The centre will then manage the warrant for approximately 12 days. During this time, trained staff will: Attempt to contact the debtor by telephone or SMS, using any contact details provided on the warrant application form. They will check that the debtor is aware of the judgment; speak to them and inform them that a warrant of control has been issued; and provide them with further information about next steps, available options and signpost them to debt advice services. Identify potentially vulnerable debtors and will offer additional support via specialist agencies. If a debtor is identified as potentially vulnerable, still will inform the creditor and ask how they wish to proceed.
    • Good Afternoon,   It would be greatly appreciated if you ladies and gentlemen can advise me what direction I should take, my problem is since we moved to our semi house my neighbour has made our lives hell constantly whinging and also accused us of damaging her property. Basically a blame game from her even though we have never done nothing whatsoever. She Even tried to put a anti social behaviour on me due to me refusing to pick up leaves from her garden saying the leaves belong to your trees. She asked me to replace the fences on the boundary which is my responsibility but here is my dilemma my side of the fence which has the feather boards there’s no rotting whatsoever due to me putting wood preservative and maintaining the fences, on her side where the framework batons hold the feathered boards have rotted away and the fences have collapsed due to her negligence of not maintaining her side, even though it’s my fence where do i stand in this predicament? she would not entertain on splitting the cost, i dare not ask. My main concern is that just recently she had her flat roof redone , my roof is pitched and there is a gap in between the both boundaries, but what her roofers have done  they have stuck the asphalt on my roof tiles without any consultation also encroaching on to my side of the boundary. How and what way should i go about getting the asphalt off my tiles, I approached her to tell her to remove the asphalt but was rude. Legally how do i go about it, also do i have a strong case? At the  moment i am a carear for my mother who is on palliative care so i had to give up work to look after her, so my finances are low. Please  i would look forward to your responses and suggestions thank you.   
    • You have no right to reject the car just because an EML warning light has become apparent, you don't even know what the fault is. You should be reasonable and accept the offer to repair. You should be working with the garage, not against them.   
  • Our picks

    • My personal experiences of Future Comms 
       
      Don't touch them owe me £500 since January 2019 make excuse after excuse. Seem they always have software problems sending money out. Keep saying they will call back or email nothing been chasing it now for 6 mths the phone staff always have the same banter we will chase it up and get back to you then nothing!
      • 0 replies
    • Future Comms is a Big Con. How to get out of it. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/417058-future-comms-is-a-big-con-how-to-get-out-of-it/
        • Like
      • 4 replies
    • Future Comms issues. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416504-future-comms-issues/
      • 5 replies
    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
zaf100

DCBL Debt recovery notice with CCJ on behalf of Excel parking

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 444 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have received a letter from DCBL which states:

"Your overdue amount of £269.48 due to Excel parking services ltd in relation to a county court judgement number xxxxxx has now been passed to DCBL to recover the debt on their behalf" It also mentions a further £75 + vat charge.

 

I have searched lots of forums and the advice has been consistent to ignore all letters from Excel parking or any debt recovery firms.

 

i am concerned this letter mentions CCJ number which suggests a CCJ has been issued. I dont recall receiving any court letters, although i have changed address.

 

Normally, I would ignore these letters as per the advice on the various forums but im worried if a CCJ has really been issued and what I should in this case?

 

Should i respond to DCBL?

Should i contact the court (and if so, which court would i need to contact as i have not had any details)? Or should i continue to ignore?

 

Please help as i am really stressed out now :(

 

Many thanks in advance for any advice/help.

Cheers

Edited by dx100uk
Format

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check with the county court Tuesday, as you can't ignore a CCJ, because if you do, then if a Enforcement Officer pays you a visit to carry out enforcement, they will add another £235.

 

If you did update your address on your Car Registration document after you moved and before this parking penalty, then you could try set aside the CCJ. If you did not update your address, then a set aside might not be possible unless there are other issues to raise. A set aside costs £255, unless you can claim exemption because you are on benefits or on very low income.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure the enforcement at this level would cost £235. This would have to be enforced by County Court bailiffs and I have the feeling that it is very much cheaper. However, it's probably not worth ignoring the CC J. Have you checked your credit file? CC J will impact on your credit rating.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your responses.

 

The parking fine was issued as my partner was driving my car and he got lost and thought he was turning into a small road, which happened to be a private car park.

The only way out was through the other side of the car park.

 

apparently their camera system detected this and issued a fine, (via post) which was purely unjustified as technically he did not park but just crossed this car park.

 

Car park in question is the manchester chorlton car park next to the banks and various other retail outlets such as quality save etc. Based on the advice on thse forums we have always ignored their letters and have never responded to date.

The initial fine was issued in 2015.

 

Towards the end of 2015, i changed address but i did get this updated on my v5 and driving license shortly after moving to my new address.

 

is there anyone else i should have informed relating to my change of address with relation to my car?

 

excel parking services somehow found my new address and have been sending me letters at my new address which i have also been ignoring based on all the advice which is consistent on various forums.

 

This is the first time i have seen the letter from DCBL and first time i am aware of this CCJ, from the letter they have sent. If Excel parking and DCBL are able to contact me on my new address then shouldnt any CCJ have been issued at my current address too as i have at my new address here now for approx 2.5 years.

 

what should be best course of action for me?

i understand i should not be ignoring the CCJ but what does this mean exactly?

That i should pay off the fine?

Should i contact DCBL?

And what does setting a CCJ aside mean?

on what basis can i set the CCJ aside and is there a cost involved in this?

 

Any help would be extremely appreciated as i am really panicking. I'm conscious now i will have bad credit rating plus having to pay a massive bill, which will keep increasing further. :'(

Edited by dx100uk
Formatting

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are saying that a claim was issued against you but you are not the driver of the vehicle at the time – then you have a good defence.

 

You can certainly try to apply for set-aside and in theory you should succeed. However because it is probably due to you having failed to update your address in time, you will probably liable for the costs of the application and that would be about £250.

 

I think you will have to work out whether you need a good credit rating over the next six years.

 

Also, it is extremely rare that we advise people to ignore these letters. I think that you must have obtained that information from some other forum.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DCBL are acting as Debt Collectors in this matter - they add the £75 charge on in the hope you will just pay believing you have received an enforcement notice.

 

As has been said you need to find out whether there is a CCJ against you and if so to which address it was directed at.

The chances are that you do have a CCJ awarded by Default to an old address

- this is because DVLA will have given the Parking Co your address at the date the infringement occurred.

 

Surely if this was because of a drive through then there should be entry & exit times?


Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your prompt response. You are correct that the advice to ignore these letters was from several other forums.

 

The address was changed 2.5 years ago and it appears the CCJ must have been issued recently as this is the first letter i have seen with reference to the CCJ. I am just very upset i didnt get any court letters hence no chance to defence myself.

 

If it will cost 255 to set the CCJ asside then perhaps it may be easier to just pay up before the costs increase further. Is there a way of paying this with out the DCBL admin charge of £75 + vat? Also, would paying this fine remove the CCJ from my credit file? Or will it remain for next 6 years? :'(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DCBL are acting as Debt Collectors in this matter - they add the £75 charge on in the hope you will just pay believing you have received an enforcement notice. As has been said you need to find out whether there is a CCJ against you and if so to which address it was directed at. The chances are that you do have a CCJ awarded by Default to an old address - this is because DVLA will have given the Parking Co your address at the date the infringement occurred.

 

Surely if this was because of a drive through then there should be entry & exit times?

 

there is no mention of when the CCJ was issued or any details of the incident.

I'm trying to google currently to understand how i can find out if there is a CCJ issued and how i can find out which address it was issued against.

 

However, to be honest i am a little nervous about finding info on the internet based on the previous advice i have read on several other forums that mentioned it will unlikely result in a CCJ, which turned out to be incorrect.

 

To be honest, i dont recall if there were start and end times.

There was a pic but it wasnt very clear and i dont recall if it had start/end times as this was sent back in 2015

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This is the first time i have seen the letter from DCBL and first time i am aware of this CCJ, from the letter they have sent. If Excel parking and DCBL are able to contact me on my new address then shouldnt any CCJ have been issued at my current address too as i have at my new address here now for approx 2.5 years.

 

Anyway, what should be best course of action for me? i understand i should not be ignoring the CCJ but what does this mean exactly? That i should pay off the fine? Should i contact DCBL? And what does setting a CCJ aside mean? on what basis can i set the CCJ aside and is there a cost involved in this?

 

Any help would be extremely appreciated as i am really panicking. I'm conscious now i will have bad credit rating plus having to pay a massive bill, which will keep increasing further. :'(

 

Unfortunately, you are one of thousands of individuals who every year have a judgment registered against them without their knowledge (in most cases, because of the failure of the debtor/motorist to update their address details with various agencies when they move address).

 

This problem was first debated in the House of Commons in 2016 (link below) and on 27th December 2017, was the subject of a Ministry of Justice public Consultation (which ended a few weeks ago).

 

https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-11-16/debates/130AE067-BB52-4487-A412-AA8109F1CB3A/CountyCourtJudgments

 

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?483835-Consultation-on-Default-County-Court-Judgments-(and-where-claims-had-been-sent-to-an-old-address)

 

Many individuals faced with notification of a court judgment being awarded against them wrong believe that they have one month to make payment, when in fact, payment is due immediately and if paid within one month.......the entry made in Registry Trust will be removed.

 

You will note from the Consultation that the government are proposing that anyone faced with a judgment that they had not know about will be able to have the Registry Trust entry removed (i.e: 'Out of Time) on the following conditions:

 

• The court is satisfied that the defendant was unaware of the claim/judgment when originally issued/entered

 

• The court is satisfied that the defendant has only just become aware of the claim and judgment

 

The defendant immediately pays in full

 

PS: My personal opinion is that if the Ministry of Justice insist that a payment of £255 is to be made for these applications, this will prohibit many people from applying. I cannot see why these applications cannot be dealt with 'without a hearing' (as with an 'N244' Application to the Traffic Enforcement Centre) and charged at £155. That would be much fairer and would not take up valuable court time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Taking my above post into consideration, my personal opinion is that as stated by Ploddertom, DCBL are acting in the capacity of Debt Collectors (as opposed to bailiffs). I would suggest that you make payment and whether you include the £75 'admin fee' must be your choice.

 

As to applying to the court for the CCJ to be 'set aside' (and the Registry Trust entry removed) I would suggest that you wait a while for the Government to announce the outcome of their Consultation.

 

PS: I am attending a conference in 10 days time where Registry Trust will also be in attendance ( the very thorny subject of Liability Orders being registered (with Registry Trust) is back on the agenda). I intend to raise the subject of this Consultation with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear

Excel and the fake bailiffs up to their usual tricks I see


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unfortunately, you are one of thousands of individuals who every year have a judgment registered against them without their knowledge (in most cases, because of the failure of the debtor/motorist to update their address details with various agencies when they move address).

 

This problem was first debated in the House of Commons in 2016 (link below) and on 27th December 2017, was the subject of a Ministry of Justice public Consultation (which ended a few weeks ago).

 

Many individuals faced with notification of a court judgment being awarded against them wrong believe that they have one month to make payment, when in fact, payment is due immediately and if paid within one month.......the entry made in Registry Trust will be removed.

 

You will note from the Consultation that the government are proposing that anyone faced with a judgment that they had not know about will be able to have the Registry Trust entry removed (i.e: 'Out of Time) on the following conditions:

 

 

 

PS: My personal opinion is that if the Ministry of Justice insist that a payment of £255 is to be made for these applications, this will prohibit many people from applying. I cannot see why these applications cannot be dealt with 'without a hearing' (as with an 'N244' Application to the Traffic Enforcement Centre) and charged at £155. That would be much fairer and would not take up valuable court time.

 

This is has some really useful info - many thanks for sharing - much appreciated.

Edited by zaf100

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can search for the CCJ here - link removed[

 

Ok I have done a check against my previous address and unfortunately there is a county court judgement on my file.

The judgement date is showing as 16th Sep 2016! I

genuinely was not aware of any of this until thursday when i received the letter from DCBL.

 

DCBL have asked me to pay the fine, plus the admin charge within 14 days.

Should i pay DCBL directly including the admin charge?

What would happen if i dont pay admin charge?

Could i potentially end up creating a bigger mess for myself and ending up paying alot more?

 

Is there any chance of having the CCJ removed.

This whole situation has been very unfortunate and feels very unfair.

This was all initiated due to a drive through accidentally and that too was done by another driver.

 

In hindsight it would have been better just to pay the initial stupid fine instead of ending up in this situation.

Im just really confused as to what is the best course of action for me now :'(

 

What should be the best course of action for me given this situation please?

 

p.s. many thanks to everyone who has taken the time to read and especially those that have replied. your help is greatly appreciated

Edited by dx100uk
Format

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok I have done a check against my previous address and unfortunately there is a county court judgement on my file. The judgement date is showing as 16th Sep 2016! I genuinely was not aware of any of this until thursday when i received the letter from DCBL. Does it tell you who the Claimant was?

DCBL have asked me to pay the fine, plus the admin charge within 14 days. Should i pay DCBL directly including the admin charge? What would happen if i dont pay admin charge? Could i potentially end up creating a bigger mess for myself and ending up paying alot more? Personally I would pay the Claimant and only what they are due - which would not include what DCBL as they have no right to charge this not being the Claimant.

 

Is there any chance of having the CCJ removed. This whole situation has been very unfortunate and feels very unfair. This was all initiated due to a drive through accidently and that too was done by another driver. In hindsight it would have been better just to pay the initial stupid fine instead of ending up in this situation. Im just really confused as to what is the best course of action for me now :'( You can only have it removed by applying for Set Aside. If you pay it then you can ask for it to be marked as Satisfied but it still remains on your Credit File.

 

What should be the best course of action for me given this situation please? Providing you can prove this was just a "drive through" - you need entry & exit times for this, then I would go for Set Aside. If no proof then you may just have to put it down to experience unfortunately.

 

p.s. many thanks to everyone who has taken the time to read and especially those that have replied. your help is greatly appreciated

 

PT


Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The claimant is mentioned as Excel parking services ltd in the letter from DCBL. On the credit file it doesnt mention who the claimant is.

It mentions the CCJ case ref number and court name as: County Court Business Centre.

The outstanding amount is being shown as £269.

 

i dont have any proof of the drive through unfortunately.

 

So should i contact Excel parking and pay them the fine instead of DCBL?

is there any chance of DCBL causing any further issues for not responding to their letter and/or not paying their admin charges?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop calling it a fine, it is not

Its a speculative invoice

 

Excel and probably BW legal purposefully got a backdoor ccj using an old address

 

I wouldn't be paying anyone anything.

Ring northants bulk Tuesday and asking for a copy of the claim form and the ccj by email PDF

 

Then ring up BW legal and tell them to set the ccj aside the ccj by mutual consent free of charge to you as he did not park anywhere but merely drove through within the 10 min grace period and that it was purposefully served to an old address

 

Dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response. Pardon me for my ignorance but what is a BW please?

 

Also, can i fill a claim form now as it appears this judgement was issued in 2016 - I thought you only have 28 days to respond within once the CCJ is issued?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BW legal or Gladstones will be the solicitors you need to ring once you action post 17

 

There no real point in filling in or paying anything

You'll never get that money back and it won't remove the ccj

 

The only way is post 17 try that first!!

 

Don't waste your money!!


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If post 17 doesn't work (and I'm afraid that I think it's unlikely that BWL or Gladrags will agree (though it's worth a shot)), you can still save yourself £14 (owe nothing (that they claim you owe) to DCBL) and remove the CCJ from your credit file by applying for a set aside for yourself. The fee for this is £255 but may be worth it to a) remove the CCJ from your credit file and b) stick it to Excel and DCBL.


We could use your help

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

 

 

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.

 

If I've helped you at all, please feel free to click on the little star under my posts and leave feedback :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the camera capture they used for evidence to issue the original NTK is correct they had no cause to do so as they have to allow a "grace period"

so arguments about who was driving are very much a secondary matter here.

 

You need to get the full details from the court and then apply for a set aside.

This will cost you money but you can claim that back as the original claim is not a genuine one

so arguing that the costs should be borne by Excel as they have behaved unreasonably in this matter will probably be agreed with.

 

As Excel are obliged to write to the address given to them by the DVLA as long as you moved after the event this is a shoo in for the set-aside but you realy need to show that they were likey to lose or the judge may think that it will be a waste of time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...