Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello I've got a parking ticket, see here... https://ibb.co/DfHqg9F https://ibb.co/QvqH52m https://ibb.co/pbPPdDg https://ibb.co/X2F1X25 I've been parking at a particular corner in a small Tesco car park for years. Recently they put two electric charging plugs, one where that spot is and one at the bay next door, so I stopped using them out of courtesy in case they need to be used (I use that Tesco every day and drive past every day but have yet to see anyone use them). Recently I went back to Tesco when it was reasonably dark. All the bays were full, including the three blue badge bays. I have one but none of the cars parked in the bays did, I noticed as I walked past them (nobody ever gets pulled for that because Tesco have never policed this small car park before). Since there was two free electric bay spaces, and since I wasn't going to be long (just one product), I parked into my former 'regular' spot. There was a notice on the wall but if I'm honest I didn't read it because (a) I'm thick, and (b) I honestly thought it was just telling people how to use the device (like I said, I'm thick) rather than this being a parking fine. I went back during daylight and the sign is very obvious (as you can see from the picture), although not so obvious at night, although probably still obvious enough for you to tell me "tough luck, pal". Now they want £100 or £60 if I pay quickly. Am I doomed?
    • Hi All   After a bit of advice to see where I stand. Bought a car in Sept 2022 on pcp. Been told it had a big inspection and was good to go. Had many issues with it throughout the year including trims coming off the car and sunroof not closing.   While getting the sunroof repaired at month 12, in Sept 2023, the bodyshop guy said your cars been in a bad accident. Garage said it hasn't but offered to take the car back at half of what I paid for it as long as I buy a replacement from them before inspecting it (probably damage control) (car was £78k, said they'd offer £40k "trade in value" as if doing me a favour).   Ended up getting a forensic inspection done for £2400 in Dec 2023, confirmed car was in a bad smash (write off level but unrecorded on hpi) and potentially unsafe to drive - front end is slightly bent towards 1 side, what looks like a hairline crack on the chasis, overspray, bonner with patches of filler all over it, damaged rubbers etc   Raised complaint to finance company and few weeks ago to FOS... just wondering what people's experiences have been like going through the FOS, main thing that concerns me is that it was 12-13 months after I bought the car that I realised what caused these issues and raised the issue to the garage/ finance co but the damage/ misaligned panels are actually visible in the advert photos which I saved thankfully.    Dealership has had my car for 4 weeks to let a few bodyshops look at it (without giving me a courtesy car!!!) Not giving me any updates either because I went to the FOS about it and didnt want to speak to them over the phone anymore as opposed to emails. Note: hanging trim was reported within 3 months but due to part delays it didn't come until like July 2023, within 2 months the piece came off again, claimed under repairers warranty for another replacement 6 weeks ago and within 2 weeks this time the trim is coming off AGAIN (assuming it won't stay on due to the car being actually bent out of shape slightly)   Any idea if I have a good case or if there's anything else I can do?   Thanks
    • After the dealer failed to refund the money I checked the sort code and account number to reveal which bank received the money. It turned out to be HSBC BUSINESS DIRECT ONLINE. I called them and they confirmed the account name wasn’t Langley Cars though obviously didn’t tell me the correct account name. My bank contacted HSBC after I reported this to be fraud and they did in fact do a charge back but reversed the decision when the dealer sent a copy of the receipt he gave me for the deposit where it said it was non-refundable. I said that doesn’t mean anything when the car should never have been put on the forecourt when it was a death trap, and not fit for purpose.   The MOT revealed only a few of the faults which he agreed to correct in a week as I needed the car to travel out of London for work. He didn’t meet that deadline either because there were other more serious problems as identified by my independent car check. The same mechanic informed the dealer of these faults. The car wasn’t fixed by the agreed date due to the extensive repairs needed. So he was in breach of our contract on many levels.    I requested the bank find out the correct name of the account and they said the only information they had was like you said was the account number and sort code. I challenged the bank stating that whenever I create a new payee if the name doesn’t match the registered account name, it declines the creation of the proposed payee. So what happened in this instance?    I checked company’s house using the address from where the dealership is located and there was neither the two names, one was aa advertised in AUTOTRADER and the other on the courtyards entrance. I thought as I had made payment to the dealers ‘Trading as’ name that it would more than likely be enforceable than any other. Indeed the Bailiff was the one to call me and say that a variation of the warrant of control needed to be done before he could go and enforce the order. I cross-checked the address on Companies House website and got 3 different business names. Only one appears to be car related.  I am unsure as to what I can do within the variation of the warrant which the bailiff felt was appropriate. I will speak to him again Monday. 
    • Their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. iit was not posted until 13 days after the event for one thing meaning it would be deemed to arrive on the 15th day instead of the 14th day. Now though we cannot expect that your PCN also missed the deadline there were still two other things wrong with the wording of the PCN that if your PCN has the same wording as your friends means that your PCN would not be compliant either. Their PCN does not specify the period of parking as required n the Act. It does show the ANPR arrival and departure dates but as those times include driving from the entrance to finding a parking place then later driving from the parking place to the exit cannot be described as a parking period. I suspect that the " Important Note" on your form will also not comply though I cannot be sure until we see your actual PCN.The reason I can't confirm that is because they sent out the PCN too late they have said that they are pursuing your friend on the assumption that they were the driver as well as the keeper-something that Courts do not accept. But it does look as if your PCN is not compliant which means that the keeper cannot be held liable to pay the charge. Only the driver can be made to pay it. If you have not appealed and revealed who was driving, there is no way that  Excel know who was driving.  So just to be sure please send them an SAR . On another topic do you have any proof that you did not stay there for so long just to really spoil Excel's day.
    • As your first PCN was a Notice to Driver which would have been followed by a Notice to keeper over a month later [even though it may only state Parking Charge notice] it is even more necessary to send PE an SAR. If either document fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act  2012 Schedule 4 then both you and your father are in the clear. So you do not need to worry about is any paperwork from unregulated debt collectors and fifth rate solicitors. The only thing to look out for is a Letter of Claim and all you have to do is respond with a snotty letter back to them .  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Second Hand Car Dealer Issues with VW Audi Melksham

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2185 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

I Bought a second hand Audi a couple of months back, part exchanging my old car. We are not talking a brand new car here but then there's not much change from15k either. From my first dealings with the garage they always seemed friendly and helpful but communication was always a challenge in that I constantly got different information depending on who I spoke to. Messages were not passed on and emails not answered.


Having finally collected the car and after a few communication issues, more problems began to arise. Within a few days the new smelling car started to have a foul odour and it was then that I noticed air fresheners hidden behind the seats, four of them. I stopped to get fuel only to find the fuel cap wouldn't open without being prised open. This fuel cap was covered under the warranty and after complaining they offered to clean the car if I took it back but as it's an hours drive away I declined this offer to remedy this myself.


I had also been promised a second key (when it was located) and the service book to be sent on recorded delivery as it was 'away being stamped'. The car was purchased in January and it's now the end of March and I still have nothing even though I have phoned and emailed twice within the last week. They have not responded to my emails at all and as far as I am concerned I was sold a car with a Full service history and actually have a car with zero service history – which if true could be worth considerably less money.


I did finally get sent the V5 document but unfortunately this was first sent to the wrong address as they didn't manage to type that in correct so this document is possibly void? Since then I have had another Audi's V5 document sent to this address with another persons name. I'm sure this is just another error from them and is clearly some kind of data breach? I have sent emails informing them of this but once again I have been ignored. I could phone them but as they just fob me off I'd rather keep my communications in writing even if I am being ignored.


I really don't know what to do next and have no idea how I stand from a legal point of view? It can't be right that I can spend this amount of money and get treated so badly and although they create the illusion of a professional company I think it's fair to say they are complete cowboys. It's not great that I have been sent another persons log-book either, not sure what to do about that?


Apologies from me for the lengthy message but any help or advice would be greatly appreciated!


Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Invariably smells such as you describe are probably due to a build up of bacteria in the HVAC system where there is a quick fix available. Most manufacturers suffer from this but the R/1000 repair ratio means it will probably never be built into the standard service routine. It's a known issue across many car lines but is dependant on use and environment which they cannot control.



Suggest you get HVAC disinfected which is not claimable generally and issue will probably disappear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The smell is just one small part of the problem and if it was just that then I could certainly live with it. The lack of any service booklet, plus ignoring communication when there has certainly been some data protection breaches is just not acceptable though!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose that we are dealing with this dealer here: – https://www.audivwsales.co.uk/


I completely agree that the treatment which you seem to be receiving from VW Audi Melksham is really quite shameful and I wonder if the chief executives of the business realise what is going on.


In terms of your legal position, don't worry. You are in a very good position to get all the things which were promised to you. The only question is whether they will start to treat you properly or whether you will have to force them by means of a court action. On the basis of what you say, if you did bring a small claims action in the County Court then your chances of winning are better than 95%.


I think one of the things you need to do is to consider whether you simply want to get the things which you were promised or whether you want to get rid of the car. If you're happy with the car and if generally speaking it is in the condition that you expected for the money you paid then probably you simply want to get the other thing sorted out.


I think you need to respond to this thread by letting us know in a bullet pointed form what are the existing faults with the vehicle or the shortcomings on the contract such as the documentation, and also what losses have you incurred – for instance cleaning the car.


In other words I'm asking you to list out what you think you would need in order to put you in the position that you would have been in if the contract had been properly executed and if VW Audi Melksham had done their job properly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is their Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/pg/audivwcars/posts/?ref=page_internal Go and post on it. Also have a look at the review sits


They have a Twitter account too but it is not maintained and no tweets since 2012.


Unusually there doesn't seem to be any information on their website about their "mission statement" service standards, terms and conditions – et cetera. I wonder if we are meant to take anything from that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for the response! We certainly are talking about: https://www.audivwsales.co.uk/


The thing I want more than anything is to make the garage see that this is not an acceptable way to deal with any customer. It's not about money for me but far more about making them answerable and if it causes them some discomfort and damage of reputation then even better. I want them to think twice before behaving the same way with another customer.


I am happy with the car but without a service history (which was how it was advertised and purchased), it could be worth 20% less, so in effect I have been ripped off. Is this something I can claim against as a small claim?


  • This could be £2500 approx for the lack of service history
  • We are looking at £90 for the full interior valet and upholstery clean
  • Although I can claim for the fuel cap on the Warranty they will not pay for the initial garage inspection so I am guessing that will be a menial charge of £25 ish at least. Hopefully the warranty company will cover the rest
  • The spare set of keys was mentioned by 1 member of staff who subsequently denied ever saying it so we may as well forget that one.


The fact that my V5 document has the wrong address will also need sorting and it's worrying that I have somebody else's V5 for another Audi sent to this address – are there any penalties for sloppy use of personal information or data breaches of this kind? And especially when they have ignored 2 emails highlighting this concerning issue.


I am reluctant to post on Facebook for now as I would like to know my rights and be able to speak with some authority. Also, I am slightly concerned over any repercussions on their part especially when my Facebook is a window into my life, fiends and family. However, and perhaps more importantly I do feel obliged to leave some honest feedback to give others some warning of their shoddy operation.


It's a quandary indeed...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you can certainly claim for the reduction in value caused by the lack of service history – as long as you are able to show that the service history was part of the deal. I hope you have got all the documentations/screenshots et cetera which show the advertising claims.


I think you will need to get a couple of written opinions as to the value of the car with service history and the comparative value without. You may incur costs on getting these reports. You would want to claim these costs back from the dealer so before you go about getting written estimates and committing money, you should write to the dealer and tell them that you consider that the car is worth less than the price you paid because of their breach of contract in falsely representing the car as having a full service history. Tell them that you are preparing to commission formal estimates of the reduced value and that you will be looking to them to recover the costs of these estimates in the event that it is confirmed that there has been a reduction in value. Tell them that you are inviting them to discuss the matter with you and to give their own estimate of the reduction in value but if you don't hear a satisfactory reply within seven days then you will proceed to obtain the estimates yourself and then start to take your own steps to recover all costs and loss of value.


Don't tell them that you consider it is a 20% reduction yet. Don't commit yourself to any figures. The moment just keep it vague. Don't make these threats unless you prepared to carry them out. Before you send your letter identify the people who would give you these estimates and arrange with them how it will happen and the cost so that at the expiry of your deadline you will be able to move immediately and get the information you want.


Once you get the information – and if it does confirm a reduction in value – whether 5%, 10%, 20% what have you, you should then write to the dealer enclosing copies of the estimates, copies of the invoices for the estimates as part of a letter before claim in which you given 14 days to reimburse you we will begin a legal action. Once again, don't make this threat unless you're prepared to carry it out. Understand the steps in making a small claim in advance so that at the expiry of your deadline you can move immediately to issue the court papers.


It is entirely likely that they will only start to respond in any meaningful way once they have received the papers.


Your letter before claim should also refer to the cost for the interior valeting, the full cost of the fuel Including a garage inspection – any losses you have suffered. I don't see any reason to give up on the set of keys. Get an estimate for replacement keys and refer to that in your letter of claim as well. Can you identify by name the staff member who referred to the keys?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They said the Audi had FSH, but did they give you any receipt?

A service book with lots of stamps is something that a dealer could do in 3 minutes, so i would never buy a car with FSH without supporting receipts of service done and paid for.

Even then, i know of dealers who claim of doing the service when they only top up the fluids and wash the car, especially on new vehicles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks once again for the replies, really helpful and gives me plenty of confidence. Strangely enough the garage has just replied to one of my emails, whether they got wind of this thread who knows but here's the opening gambit:


"Firstly apologies that you feel I have been ignoring you, However I have been out of the country and also at hospital appointments which I have only just arrived back today, and have put everything to one side now I have seen your emails."


Would you believe an 'operations manager' for a supposedly professional garage would not have a simple 'out of office' email procedure or at least have anyone else covering emails? We can only assume that wifi is not functional in this particular hospital or anywhere on one of these trips abroad. Emails were also ignored when sent to the info@ address so if giving the benefit of the doubt, I imagine the whole organisation was off to the hospital as a group and then off overseas… Or maybe not? I wonder if the same would apply if I was looking to buy a car?


In terms of the service history:


“so Indeed your car does have full service history and this can be backed up by Audi by calling the service history line which is 0800 5423037, however yes I am still awaiting a physical service book (which I will chase up today)*“


So at least I have written confirmation that my car does have a full service history, thats a start. Should I expect receipts too as proof or will a stamped book be enough? Assuming that it actually arrives…


In terms of the V5 document, the address they hold for me is correct so that can only be put down to some sloppy typing on their part inline with all of their other transactions. I am in the process of rectifying this as apparently they cannot act on my behalf even though they made the error.


The other V5 document I have received is apparently nothing to do with this garage as “We have never bought / sold / traded or had any contact with this vehicle”. This seems a bit of a strange coincidence considering it happens to be an Audi and all of the other issues with this garage but for now I will have to give them the benefit of the doubt.



They have offered to fix the odour and fuel cap issues but it’s going to take at least a day of my time, plus fuel for the journey for the round trip so ultimately I would rather get it all sorted locally. I would also rather not have to deal with these jokers ever again understandably. The fuel cap can be repaired under warranty and I will stomach the cost of the interior valet myself rather than lose a day of my time – these can all be sorted while I am at work so far more convenient. I will get the costs first though and then consider implications.


So all in all we are making progress – at least there’s a dialogue which is a start, and an admission that the service history will be sent. However, certainly not there yet!


Thanks again folks…

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I agree. I think you would have the car thoroughly checked over by some independent garage because frankly VW Audi Melksham sound like quite a shower and personally I wouldn't want to go to them.


I'm sorry if the guys that have hospital appointments et cetera but at the end of the day he charge you the price for the car and he owes you 100% of the service and he has to go away or be out of the country then it's up to him to get somebody else to sort it out.


Keep on their case. And if they don't know about the thread that I suggest that you take steps to make sure they do know about it. Also, I suggest that you put a few reviews around the Internet.


I think you're completely wrong not to get the cost of the valeting from them. There is absolutely no reason why they shouldn't be held completely responsible for the car which they have sold you. Don't start doing them any favours. They're in business to make profits. What about the spare key?


Consumers who hold retailers to account help to push up standards of service and quality of products for everyone. Consumers who let things go simply provide an incentive for these retailers to provide shoddy stuff and shoddy service because they always think that their customer is going to do them a favour.


That's certainly not what we are about in this forum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the key,

when my friend had his car stolen, the insurance asked him for the 2 keys.


He panicked because he couldn't find the spare and they pointed out to a hidden part of their t&c mentioning this.


Then he found the other key, but if i were you i would insist on that point as well.


Audi dealers can get the key cut by the chassis number i think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once again good advice folks and you are completely right in that I really shouldn't be at a loss in any way at all due to their incompetence.


I will indeed pursue this and lets see where it goes.


I will certainly be leaving honest reviews when all is resolved as quite frankly I wouldn't want anyone else to get the same treatment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...


They have offered to fix the odour and fuel cap issues but it’s going to take at least a day of my time, plus fuel for the journey for the round trip so ultimately I would rather get it all sorted locally. I would also rather not have to deal with these jokers ever again understandably. The fuel cap can be repaired under warranty and I will stomach the cost of the interior valet myself rather than lose a day of my time – these can all be sorted while I am at work so far more convenient. I will get the costs first though and then consider implications. …



About 25 years ago when I worked for VAG they had an internal charging system between dealers, worth exploring to use a more near dealership perhaps???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...