Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you all   JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.   As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.   Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me. I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 
    • Are you saying that both businesses were closed? Yet you stayed there for over two hours. . If both were closed than to charge £100 is a penalty since Horizon had no legitimate interest in keeping spaces clear for the company. sake as there were no customers..
    • Well you would think that would be the case. Sadly i doubt there is one honest broker within the BPA or IPC and most of their members. they are there to take as much money as they can from motorists regardless of PoFA.   Take the Consideration  period for example. This is a minimum of 5 minutes to allow motorists to find a parking space, read the T&Cs giving them enough time to leave the car park without having to pay if they decide not stay. Simple. Well it would be simple if it were any other company than BPA [or IPC who have now fallen into line with BPA's "reasoning"].  You see if you decide to stay then despite the fact that during the Consideration period when you still weren't classed as parking , once you accept the terms [with all the underhand little tricks designed to trip you up] that five minutes is now included in your parking time. [No not the parking period because the poor dears who ANPR cameras are apparently unable to work out what the exact parking period is since their ever so infallible cameras [yeah right] are incapable of tracking cars once they are in a car park]. After 12 years they still haven't worked out a way of doing it. Some of them fudge and the majority [with a wink fro their ATA [Accredited Trade Association though it should be Discredited Trade Association] just ignore the parking period all together. This is what BPA claim is the Consideration period Entrance grace period: This is for when motorists enter a car park, read the signs and/or attempt to make payment then leave. In these instances, motorists must be offered a reasonable amount of time before an operator takes enforcement action, but we do not define this time, due to the variance in size and layout of car parks. An entrance grace period for a small, permit-only car park could be below 5 minutes, whereas for a large multi-story this could be 15. But  heaven forbid that anyone should leave 6 or 7 minutes after entering  their member's car parks. . They are dutybound to receive a PCN. This is regardless of how busy the car park would be [Christmas eve for example ] .Our minimum is their maximum. Moving on to Grace periods. Again BPA gobble degook. Exit grace period: This must be a minimum of 10 minutes and this is when a motorist intends to stay – for example, if you paid for an hour but spent a total of 1 hour 10 minutes on-site, you will not receive a PCN. It is important to note that the grace period is not a free period of parking however and should not be advertised as such. If that ten minutes in not free parking what is it. their members all think they can send out PCNs for anything after 1 minute after the exact time never mind ten minutes. Our snotty letters have stood the test of time. Do not try to reinvent the wheel -especially with DCBL . They don't even know what a non compliant PCN is for goodness sake! You already know more about PoFA then they do. However if you include that they will find a way to disabuse the Judge of your logic and the law. So don't give them the chance.  I am sure you have the Parking Prankster going on about the rogues misusing the rules on planning permission by lying and stating that they had "retrospective permission". There is no such thing in English law yet Judges were swallowing it until one Judge pulled up Parking Eye about one of their Witness Statements alluding to "rp" by claiming it was "tantamount to perjury".  It wasn't tantamount,it was plain and simple perjury. Parking Prankster: The great private car park planning approval scam PARKING-PRANKSTER.BLOGSPOT.COM Guest blog from shuteyepark, from the Consumer Action group forums In December 2013 my daughter received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) fro... Hope it wasn't too long winded Nicky Boy.🙂
    • and more immediate issues WT* is the UK doing. Ukraine needs these funds and weapons NOW Lets sincerely hope this isnt another Tory VIPal skimming issue.   MoD accused of ‘go-slow’ with half of £900m Ukraine fund unused | Defence policy | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Delays mean just £404m of the money donated by nine countries has been committed or spent  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Link/kearns claimform - old barclaycard debt - N244 to lift stay received


robinjw
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1430 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The doc I received was from the CCBC stating Small Claims Mediation Team has arranged for the case it to be transferred to my local court. however, no appointment was given.

 

The 'file will be referred to a procedural judge' who will allocate the claim to track and give management directions' ( whatever that means!) It says if Ive not been sent an appointment then "none was able to be arranged."

 

It just says to await the judges directions, which have not been sent yet. 

 

My local court address is included. This is why its so confusing.

 

The 'solicitors' keep stating Ive received it and ignored it, which is nonsense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

aha this is what I am eluding too

 

there is NO mediation taking place then.

you must have answered NO to mediation on the N180

or

the fleecers did on their.

 

so thus mediation has bounced it back to Northants bulk

and northants bulk have allocated it to your selected local court 

that court will now write to you with a hearing time

and dates whereby you both must exchange WS's I will assume.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought you'd been researching on cag??

Witness statement

 

Let things run

Await the N157

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have link or their dogs been sending you emails?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Emails, calls, and letters since they got hold of my details via the court docs. Ive blocked all, but letters always arrive with thick wad of their 'proof' that Im a liar etc.  I hope I can use these threats back at them when the next phase starts. Of course their charges go up each time too for sending some photocopied garbage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the court should not be fwding on any court docs on with your other pers details and don't.

the n180 - you sent them a copy,  you did hide you email/sig/phone on kearns copy?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I deliberately did leave that off of their copy.

 

The 'solicitors' stated on subsequent paperwork that they had sight of the court copy, hence the harassment began again.

Specifically via email and calls, (blocked) and also letters.

 

Now they mention forum posts in every communication too.

Id have to check, but I think they also stated that's where they got my contacts from.

 

I can assure you I have not given them any contact details because I know they can be relentless.

Until the last judge removed the stay and I answered it they were only sending letters and the usual round of numbers they ring from- my phone auto flags them as potential spam ( a truly 'smart' phone!).

 

Is it illegal for them to do that - would the court have made a mistake in allowing contacts to be seen perhaps?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well make a specific log of all of it 

 

inc blocked calls. even though you obv didn't answer them

time date of each and scan of the letter / email it refs.too

 

there would only have been the n180 with your details and I wouldn't trust anything they say implicating the court

or here

as you know, there is nowhere your details are available from here and they most certainly don't have a spy in the admin camp I can assure you.:lol:

 

sadly nothing unusual for link and their cohorts. as pointed we know them well.

 

should you wish to fwd copies of where they mention this forum please do so via PM unless its what you already sent via PM here around nov 5

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just ignore them 

just stick to what the court send to you.

 

its all done to intimidate, confuse and unsettle a defendant

 

its a trick all link/kearns staff learned early on from their MD , thats how he got £1m's out of people that most probably didn't even owe it in the first place.

 

so have you received an N157 from your local court yet?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you wont need to respond to the N157..

 

other than to

note the date of the hearing

thus 14 days before that date - the date for the exchange of witness statements unless another date is given

note the date the claimant has to pay the fee by - if they don't then the claim could be struck out.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive looked at the N157 online and I have not received anything like that yet.

 

As they are so keen to bring a court case I cant imagine they won't pay the fee ( unless they think the case is dubious?) as they already changed their last solicitor and chased the judge to lift the stay.

They are very aggressive.

 

Would I only be notified from the court when all the dates have past and the next stage is set to continue or if it's been struck out then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

eh?

you'll get an N157 from the court, when they allocate it to one.

and I suspect this will be well into next year now.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

just a quick update,

I had a court letter stating that the claimant had to pay a court fee or file a completed application for help with fees, by May, for the case to continue, if they do that -then the case will be heard in June.

 

However it also states the case could still be struck out if this does not happen ( it was stayed previously).

If struck out it will be vacated unless a counterclaim survives the strike out.

 

So the wait continues.

Should I be doing anything in the meantime to prepare?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes  start looking at examples of statements and evidence as per the notice of allocation directions....which you must complete by the date stated.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

where do i find details of witness statements, and how do I know which one might be the right one for me to use etc? There was nothing on the court paper saying I had to do anything or reply by any date. Bit confused now ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

page 2 should give the details of the date you must exchange witness statements by.?

 

use our custom google search after hitting the top squares logo for example you can adapt.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive checked for a witness statement example as suggested above, but all I get is a lot of links to other folks issues.

Ive read through a couple but they are not similar to mine.

 

I have a huge amount of paperwork for this issue and Kearns have added massively to the original figure ( over £1200 at 8% interest pa.

 

It was originally stayed by previous judge then Kearns took over and got it lifted.

 

Where do I start with a witness statement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This Court letter you have received informing you of when the claimant had to pay the hearing fee.....It is the N157 and not just a General Order ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent so it is the Notice of Allocation with directions telling you the dates to submit your statement and evidence.

I was just checking you had the correct notice.

 

Andy

 

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes looks like it, thanks Andy, Can you please direct me to the right template to try to formulate the defense. I won't submit it until close to the due date, but I like to sort stuff out in advance so I know what Im doing.

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are no templates of witness statement...its your statement in your words particularised to support your defence using any docs as evidence....so each statement on CAG is unique to the individual claim/thread....but there are plenty to view so you can see the layout and how it should be formatted.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where do I start though?

I have no idea how to formulate it based on the inch thick pile of documents i have.

 

Since the case was stayed and then resurrected with a new 'solicitor'- is that relevant at all?

Is it relevant that it was almost statute barred and I received bad advice from Step change re continuing?

What about the interest they say is accruing at 8% pa- do I add anything about that?

What is my basic defense start point?

What legal bits am I supposed to quote?

 

Looking through the paperwork I have I cant find anything that states they have been assigned the debt from Barclays, shouldn't I have something about that? 

 

I have photocopies of the signed credit agreement.

Most of the paperwork I have is copies sent more than once, plus stuff I have requested as per advice here.

I am very worried about this as it is such a large amount they are requesting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...