Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
    • The UK-based mining giant Anglo American says it has received a takeover proposal from Australia's BHP.View the full article
    • who gave you the NTH? who was it sent to? thread title updated dx  
    • blimey CAG gave all that FREE help over +6mts and +100 posts and they never even bothered to comeback...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Summons..... told there wouldn't be one.


scareyb
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2231 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Will try keep it brief...

 

Aug 2017 i cancelled dd

this was due to my daughter been placed with me by local authority ,

money was tight with everything(food on table)

 

Due to the things happening around the case and my well being of my daughter priority i totally over looked the November dd or payments.

 

I was spending all my time on pc doing research for my situation,

tv was been used on android box iptv 24/paw patrol and terrarium kids movies

 

January knock on door( i was up to eyes in paper work for case)

let him in explained the reason for overlooking it

(even showed him contract of expectations from the local authority to show i was genuine )

 

he asked to test the tv

i didn't even know how to get it on as we always used box

he asked when was it last used i said 24/7 paw patrol for daughter on iptv service.for the daughter

 

i haven't used tv for 6 months in fact the virgin box is in the cupboard as i cant get out of contract and i use android box

 

,he set up payment plan which has been adhered to.

 

HOWEVER i have received a summons he said that i wouldn't

on examining the documents he put i watched cbeebies for bairns usually,

this is incorrect i said paw patrol and for the bairn,as there is only my daughter

 

.i need to respond to summons

any advise on attaching a letter to be considered in case

Edited by Andyorch
Paragraphs
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Record of Interview form (TVL 178) is commonly referred to with TV licence cases as a 'prosecution statement' as it will be used by TV Licensing in court as evidence that you had agreed that you had been watching 'live' TV without a valid licence.

 

Given the contents of the form you clearly need to plead 'guilty' but that is not to say that you should not return the summons with a letter outlining the reason why you overlooked paying the direct debit. At least by entering a 'guilty' plea, you will benefit from a one third discount in the court fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the problem you have is that TV Licensing requirements say that a licence is required to watch (or record) any kind of TV while it is being broadcast and/or BBC iPlayer. This would include an Android Box that is receiving broadcast TV via the internet (or iPlayer) and it sounds like that's the trap you've fallen into.

 

It didn't help that you had an aerial connected and the licence salesmonkey could get the TV to display Freeview.

 

Because you've signed the TVL178 form, you've already admitted your guilt. As BA has said above, all you can hope for now is some sympathy from the Magistrates when they read your mitigation.

 

I know this doesn't help you in this situation, but I've not had a TV licence for about 10 years now, but I've no aerial or internet TV box. I use only catch-up services (except iPlayer), games consoles & computers. There's plenty to watch quite legally (even for kids) without falling foul of the TV licence salesmonkey that comes to your door.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no your device that uses terrarium

 

there are no templates no.

 

are you indicating you are in Scotland?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

catch up ike a virgin box you mean

 

No, wouldn't go anywhere near one of those as the TV Licensing salesmonkey could easily say that you were watching broadcast TV and you wouldn't be able to prove otherwise, same with a Sky box etc. I use the catch-up & streaming apps (except iPlayer) on my xBox One or stream movies (legally owned I might add) etc to it from my media server.

 

That way I can be 100% certain that even if they were let in to my home (which they wouldn't be under normal circumstances) they could look at my TV equipment all they wanted but they'd never be able to get a 'live' picture or anything else that I'm not legally allowed to watch without having to pay the BBC a small fortune for the privilege. Sooner or later a lot of the better BBC programmes show up on Netflix anyway, which I can watch quite legally without a TV Licence.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

In future don't let them in, look through peephole or window and if you don't know who it is get start video recording upon opening the door. Don't answer any questions, don't sign anything and as soon as they've identified themselves close the door.

 

 

Sorry to hear about this, unfortunately when you try to do the "right" thing this is what they do, they work on commission as I understand it and so no matter how genuine your story is they're gonna do you if given the chance so it's a waste of time talking.

 

 

I agree with the advice already given, just plead guilty now but next time shut the door.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like to play with their heads a little :wink:

 

The last one that came to the door asked me if I had "A television". I replied no, I didn't have A television, I had 6 of them. The look on his face was priceless, you could almost see the £ signs rolling in his eyes.

 

He then cautioned me. He'd not even asked my name before doing so, so I simply replied "no comment" to anything else he said. You could see his shoulders slumping :lol:

 

Finally, he asked me to sign the form he'd spent the last 15 minutes filling in. I just laughed at him.

 

They've not been back since.

 

 

This wouldn't be the advice that I'd give to anyone else mind, it's not a recommended course of action. It's just that I like to mess with them (also all on camera, so they can't later claim that I said or did anything that I didn't).

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha

 

 

I like to ask for an admittance fee of £500, seeing as they only collect £20 if they sell you a licence on the door it's clear why they never want to pay it. Or say my name is Donald Duck, they never seem to want to write that one down.

 

 

Sometimes they're running away as soon as you pull out the camera so there's no need to say anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Asking them to pay a fee is straying too far into FMotL territory for me, but it's still fun to mess with them.

 

They rarely notice my cameras until I point them out. The one in my hallway clock (that faces the front door) also records audio (only when the front door is open) so there's just no get out for them if they try to say that I did or said something (when I know I didn't).

 

Pulling a phone on them, although it's fun to watch them run away, puts them on the defensive too much (if they stay), I prefer the more subtle approach and leave them to dig their own hole.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...