Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Motorway temp speed limit - unclear photgraphs


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2258 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received an NIP for "speeding" on the motorway in a speed restricted area.

The signage was very unclear and when I sped up it was because I thought the speed restricted zone had ended as there was no signage to suggest otherwise and other motorists sped up too making it unsafe for me to continue at the restricted speed.

I was recorded as going 9 miles over the speed limit

 

when I called to ask about this they told me that it was an average taken from when I entered the zone and when I left.

Does anybody know anything about how they work this out?

And how I could challenge this?

 

The Police have sent me photographic evidence of my car but the photos do not show the context and thus you can't see that there were no signs around telling drivers to maintain the restricted speed.

 

Is there a requirement to provide photographic evidence of the context?

Can I do a freedom of information request?

 

Many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

How was the signage unclear?

You were in a temp speed limit,

Now ill take this as a maintenance zone or a temp restriction from overhead signage displaying 50mph.

So at what point did you pass a national speed limit sign ?

You sped up because cars around you did and it was unsafe???

Poppycock.

 

Wagons are restricted to 56, some even 52 mph

 

Your looking for an excuse to get off a speeding ticket when you've made a large error in judgment.

Not obeying speed limit signs.

 

Edit

There are huge signs before an average zone saying just that.

 

AVERAGE SPEED CHECK

And they have repeater signs of the actual limit

 

Average speed limit zones are the average speed between two or more points. They know the time it takes between the points at the speed limit so anything faster means your speeding.

 

So if at 50mph speed limit it takes 2 mins to get from check point A to check point B and you do it in 1min 30, your speeding.

Time over distance equals speed I think it is.

 

If you feel you can challenge the laws of physics then appeal and take it to court.

If not id hope for a speed awareness course at best, 3 points and £100 quid lighter at worst

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply sgtbush.

 

Could you clarify for me that the law is that you must travel at the temporary restricted speed (in this case 50mph) until you see a sign with the national speed limit of 70 mph?

 

In this case the speed restriction took place within 6.2 miles,

there was no signage upon the exit to say that the temporary speed limit was lifted.

I travel along this particular route fairly often and was able to check the next time I drove along this stretch of motorway.

 

I mentioned going at the speed of the other drivers only because I was once pulled over for driving too slowly and the PC told me that I should maintain the speed of the other drivers in order to be safe.

I have used this as a rule of thumb ever since, but I take your point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was recorded as going 9 miles over the speed limit and when I called to ask about this they told me that it was an average taken from when I entered the zone and when I left. Does anybody know anything about how they work this out? And how I could challenge this?

 

An average speed is calculated between 2 known fixed points. Speed = time over distance.

 

SPECS (average speed) cameras are placed a known (measured) distance apart and have a fixed focal point, so that it is known (within a few cm) where on the road surface the camera is 'reading' a vehicle number plate. At the point of the 'read' a clock is started.

When a camera further along the road, again focused on a known fixed point 'reads' the number plate, the clock is stopped.

 

As an example, If the camera focal points are 500M apart and the speed limit is 50mph, it must take 22.36 seconds to travel from point 1 to point 2. If it takes longer than that, the vehicle was travelling below the speed limit, it it takes less time than that, the vehicle was travelling above the speed limit.

 

Now, bearing in mind the guidance as regards speeding, in a 50mph area you'd (probably) get away with 55mph, so the time is reduced to 20.33 seconds. Do it in 20.32 seconds or less and you're going to be getting a ticket.

 

As for how you can challenge it. That's easy. All you have to do is prove that physics is wrong! Good luck :thumb:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Average speed check zones are common place.

You dont have to travel at the restricted speed as you state. You can go slower.

Its a limit not a target.

If the limit on the road is 50, you do a maximum of 50.

If you pass a sign saying 30, you do up to 30. Likewise if your in a 50 and you pass a national speed limit sign you can do up to 70 on a duel carriage way or 60 normal road. (asuming your in a car)

 

There does not have to be a sign saying end of average speed check area. You shouldn't be doing over Te posted limit anyways.

 

The constable is wrong.

The only time you can be done for going too slowly is on a motorway.

I believe you must do at least 40mph if memory serves.

Unless your escorted by a separate vehicle with the relevant warning signs and flashing lights.

 

Remember speed limits are just that. A limit, not a target

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The constable is wrong.

The only time you can be done for going too slowly is on a motorway.

I believe you must do at least 40mph if memory serves.

Unless your escorted by a separate vehicle with the relevant warning signs and flashing lights.

 

There are no minimum speed "limits" on the UK road network save in a few places. The Dartford tunnel is one which has a minimum speed of 30mph IIRC. Minimum speed areas are signposted with a blue sign showing the speed limit, and the end of the zones with a blue sign showing the speed limit with a red diagonal line through it.

 

Driving too slowly on any road is likely to get you stopped and asked why, and may see you charged with driving without due care, but for 99% of roads there is no actual minimum speed.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

arguing you didnt see the signs may well get you clobbered for driving without due care and attention or careless driving.

 

as an aside, you can be done fro driving too slowly, again it is careless driving so doing 30mph on a motorway in normal driving conditions may well get you 3 points. The threshold for careless driving was changed about 3 years ago partly to deal with old people driving within the speed limits but very badly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An Average Speed Check is just that, you must maintain an average speed not above the posted limit until you are told otherwise, i.e: by a NSL sign or other speed limit sign.

 

You are within your rights to travel at upto 70mph, not withstanding other speed limits or cameras in force, but you must ensure your average over the measured distance is not above the posted average limit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...