Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1 Date of the infringement 23/10/2019     2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] No idea on original but Debt Recovery Plus states their notice is 07/01/2021   [scan up BOTHSIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please do not put JPG Picture files into your post   3 Date received 11/01/2021   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Back of letter mentions it.   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Photographic evidence I went in and out of the car park, also I have evidence the payment machine was not working.   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No as didn't know I had it.   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up n/a   7 Who is the parking company? Smart Parking Ltd   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Bell Centre Melton Mowbray   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Not been given the option   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here Second letter demanding payment by 29/01/2021     Parking.pdf
    • Sorry, what you've typed above seems to be a bit of a jumble and I'm not sure what the various bold text and coloured text sentences are meant to be. Please could you just post up what you are intending to write. Also, are you sure the DPD local is actually P2G?   Who did you make your contract with? Who provide you with a receipt? With whom do you have the account? Presumably at the bottom of some of the documents you've been receiving, there are the company registration details for DPD local. If that is right then I would have thought that you should simply be suing DPD local. You have the documents in front of you are not me – so you will have to decide that it seems to me that they are poised to reject a claim on the basis that you are suing the wrong identity – and that would mean a waste of money and having to begin again. They are obviously trying to be quite slippery with all their their identities. I think you should examine your account and who you paid.  
    • @Tartan Barty   Tartan Barty's Content (consumeractiongroup.co.uk)    
    • Yes, you're right - hoping they would just do the right thing I guess. So template if not a business would be    Dear   [Reference: (Your products and service)   I am writing to complain about the service you provided when [describe].   We agreed that the service would be performed on (date) However (description of what happened) It has now become apparent that the service you have provided is deficient in the following respects [describe].   Section 49 of The Consumer Rights Act 2015 requires you to carry out your service with reasonable skill and care. The problems described above show that you failed in your legal obligations. I therefore have a claim against you for breach of contract.   As a result of the incident I have suffered consequential losses, which you are liable to compensate me for. These losses are [value/details].   Section 57 of The Consumer Rights Act 2015 prohibits any terms and conditions from restricting a consumer’s rights under the Act.   Under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 remedies for breach of contract must be performed within a reasonable amount of time, without significant inconvenience to me, and whilst the company bears all necessary costs.   I therefore look forward to receiving your reply within the next 14 days.   So could it be  Letter of Claim.   **** – TTL - is claiming £541.89 from Parcel2Go.com Ltd, trading as DPD-Local-Online.co.uk  - DPDLO. This is to cover the costs of TTL having to send a replacement parcel to a customer, as a result of DPDLO refusing to provide the delivery information (courier company and local tracking number) required for TTL to refute a non-delivery claim by the customer. Parcel sent August 20 2020 and delivered August 28th 11.30am (according to DPD tracking)    The customer contacted TTL in September to confirm non-delivery. TTL contacted DPDLO to obtain their information on the shipment, and they raised a Case, and subsequently attempted to close the Case : We’re pleased to let you know that your parcel DPD4227962 has been located. This enquiry has been closed as your parcel has received new tracking events or has been delivered.   TTL asked DPDLO by email for the details behind the above – who made the delivery, where to, who to – obviously basic information needed to check the School’s claim for non-delivery, and which would be expected to be readily available from the DPDLO records.  Despite numerous repeated email requests, DPDLO consistently refused to give TTL this information, and also declined to give TTL information to enable direct contact with the local courier who actually made the delivery on behalf of DPDLO.   Without this information it was obviously impossible for TTL to refute the School’s claim for non-delivery.   Even when, Dec 2nd, DPDLO confirmed that DHL was the local courier, they declined to give TTL the DPDLO / DHL tracking number that would have enabled DHL to identify the delivery.   As a direct result of DPDLO’s refusal to provide the perfectly reasonable information requested, confirming the delivery to the School, TTL is unable to refute the School’s claim for non-delivery, and is left with the full cost of sending a replacement parcel to the School.   The detailed claim comprises AU Customs Declared Goods Value £ 425.00 and shipping £116.89 I look forward to receiving your reply within 14 days.     
    • as said before you NEVER ring a DCA or their dogs ever ..they will LIE TO YOU.   trustonline.org using your old name and address. get the CCJ numer then go ring northants bulk as advised earlier.    
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

Cabot chasing ex barclaycard debt - statute barred ?


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1077 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Last payment to credit card 20th October 2011 was sold to DCA October 2015.

No payments until now (13/2/18)

 

Have been speaking on the phone to DCA and sent couple of correspondence emails, with debt reference in subject field.

I'm worried that in one of my emails I may have accepted liability?

just being paranoid :-(

 

This what I wrote.... may 2017

 

Hi, I've not had a chance to contact you because I've had problems with my housing situation.

I had to move out of my friends where I had been living for the last 2 months..

I've found another place to live temporarily...

I'm trying to settle and work, I'm still doing my zero hours contract work with a security firm.

 

It's still very hard, I'm juggling with paying rent and everyday living costs at the moment..

. please call me if you want to speak with me further..

. I have little credit on my phone which I use to look for work and essential calls.

 

does this constitute acknowledgement of debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

and why are you even talking on the phone!!

 

you've been here +3yrs and should no better

 

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF!!

and has

ZERO legal powers

 

whos the original creditor.?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you sure on the last payment?

20th October 2011

 

who's the DCA hoist or link?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah defo sure on the 20th October 2011, phoned them up today and got all the details of account. Also Barclay confirmed... hoist is the dca

 

Then it is statute barred

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

no never seen that ever...

 

are cabot aware of your correct current address?

i'e have you moved since taking out the card and never informed them or the OC in WRITING you've moved?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
I was just worried about that particular email that I sent last year, if it would be seen as acknowledgement of debt

 

No.....you dont acknowledge any debt.....you refer to your personal circumstances....you didn't refer to an account number or balance ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sid,

 

Just to make sure, what exactly was the subject heading of any of the emails you sent them.

 

Send nothing more and stay off the phone. If they call you, hang up !

 

From what you've said, you have no need at all to listen to anything the DCA wants to say by letter, email or verbally. Stat Barred as said above.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx: Address hasn’t changed Was able to get my letters from the original address... never in writing informed them of any change just this email posted above...

 

Andyorch: the email subject was just their internal reference number, not account number or balance

 

Slick: just their internal reference number, send them statute barred letter ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so why are letter s being sent to another address if you haven't moved?:???:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think i'd be inclined to send our statute barred letter from your current address

kills 2 birds.

its in the debt collection section of our library

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX is bang on !!

 

The letter will tell them your current address and tell them it's SB'd.

 

If they take court action using the old address, you can show they deliberately used the old address wrongly (so you wouldn't defend) !

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...