Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I (and other respondents) always advise “not getting caught in a lie” it hardens their response. Why would they now believe protestations of remorse and “I won’t do it again” if they've already seen you'd lie and say it was a one-off when it wasn't..  You can try approaching the prosecutor on the day, but "I wouldn't hold my breath" …..  
    • I told them that it was an accident and that I used the oyster card as my debit card was lost. However, they did an investigation and realised it was not a one off. I have told them how remorseful I feel and how a criminal conviction would result in expulsion from my degree but they still want to take me to court. I have received the court summons letter
    • 20 million quid on just the brokering fee for a crappy deal with the UK public hocked to pay more for PPE - which was probably useless with better and cheaper per item with no 20 million quid fee - available from alibaba Stinks of corruption to me.  
    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I shoplifted today in Tesco and am now awaiting DWF Letter


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2081 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you - when the above comment says they send it back to Tesco - can Tesco then take it up themselves - just worried as they had CCTV of me - although the letter was £0 theft and £0 damage as the others...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think you have to put this into some perspective...do you really think a company like Tesco would be bothered...thats why they farm it out to parasites and see if you fall for their nonsense.

 

Its simply not financially viable to esculate.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have to put this into some perspective...do you really think a company like Tesco would be bothered...thats why they farm it out to parasites and see if you fall for their nonsense.

 

Its simply not financially viable to esculate.

Totally agree but for slightly different reasons.

 

All tesco can claim back is the value of the goods stolen and a small admin fee. They got the goods back so how can they sue for £0?? Also, it would cost them far more in legal costs than they could ever get back from you so it isn't cost effective to do so.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply not financially viable......:-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It feels crazy as I did commit the crime and got caught and it doesn't seem right that there are no consequences for me

- I consider myself very lucky that the police were not called and definitely gave me a serious reality check as to why I even did it....

 

GP reckons it was a cry for help as I was so blatant about it... anyway it's done, won't be repeated and I appreciate all of your help

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop worrying !

My friend says to expect a 3rd letter as my previous post and to obviously ignore this as well.

 

He has received nothing at all after his 3rd letter which was received only 2 weeks after the 1st in early November 17 not even any letters from 'debt collectors'.

 

Looks like they know he's not one of the 'easy targets' and have given up as it's a waste of their time.

 

Hope this also goes some way to put your mind at rest.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

OOH! Scary letter-NOT.

 

They state that 'they will consider' and 'payment or response' Your response is go forth and multiply by not responding at all. I notice that earlier in this thread that you said that it was crazy that you committed the act with no consequences. If you wanted to assuage your guilt, make a donation to your choice of charity or donate to CAG.

 

As for now, ignore!

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should be the last letter now. just ignore.

My friend has still not received anything else since his 3rd letter in November.

 

Whilst I obviously don't condone shoplifting, what totally annoys me is that this Country does have a strange attitude in that 'legalised' theft, corruption and indirect fraud is rampant in the form of 'hidden' activities by usually large corporate companies such as ripping off the general public by misleading them, tv licencing exorting money from the public etc etc. and this is all seen as acceptable.

 

However if you inadvertently steal a tin of beans you are labelled as carrying out a most heinous terrible crime worthy of a public thrashing.

This is why the government don't like sites like this and will tell people not to trust information on the internet.

Broken corrupt Britain at its best.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sean the Sheep.

 

I was entirely at fault here - I fully expected them to call the police and for me to have a criminal record etc.

I actually cannot believe that stores themselves are so "soft" on shoplifters.

 

I understand that it isn't worth time/effort etc to pursue small amounts but for those who know this is what happens it's like giving them a green light to steal and have no consequences (except these letters)....

 

personally I think I was away with the fairies and as I say I must have subliminally wanted to be caught because I was so blatant...

 

still have no idea what happened in this head of mine that day to bring on such erratic behaviour as since I have been "normal" again and it seems very surreal....

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

they are not interested in one off offenders

 

the serial offenders that p'haps feed a drug habit etc etc they are.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is my belief that all shoplifters be referred to the police for one simple reason. They have no financial interest.

 

The police tend to use common sense and will tend to take the shoplifters excuse into account. For first timers who have a valid reason, (away with the fairies is one) the police will take no action and put it down to accidental theft or at the very worst, offer a fixed penalty notice. These are not normally recorded as being a crime.

 

That is also a reason why the likes of RLP and DWF don't want the police involved.

 

My advice to any alleged shoplifter. Call the police yourself and state that you are being held against your will (NOT 999 ) People have been dragged into the security office and if the accusation is false, the store will be in for a shed load of trouble.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

That makes sense although from an offenders perspective and having no prior knowledge I saw it as a good thing at the time that they didn't phone the police almost as if they were doing me a favour... ironic isn't it how the mind works. Thanks again for everyone's help and advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Silver fox is right, when stopped by Security, if you have stolen something you cannot leave but they cannot make you go into an office. I do not condone theft but if you empty your bag of any stolen goods and tell them that is it then you can walk out.

 

I know of a particular store where the security staff are being charged with assault for grabbing hold of people trying to drag them back into the store.

 

I have never shop,iftedbut an alarm went off once as l was leaving a shop, at the same time a young man was walking out who l would imagine was a culprit, l refused to stop and told the guard to stop picking on women and make the effort to stop the more likely suspect, he walked off.

 

I know that is stereo typing but l think it wasn’t an unreasonable assumption.

 

I hope you get help from your GP.

 

Cups

Link to post
Share on other sites

the law regarding what a person can and cannot do in shops regarding apprehending someone is rather confused as court cases have decided it is private land but also a public place so theoretically you can go behind the counter and you arent doing anything wrong.

 

The private land part would allow the security staff to use NECESSARY force to apprehend you if you were in the process of committing an indictable offence whereas in a public place they have little to defend themselves if they did use force other than for self defence because of the corruption of the meaning of the word reasonable.

 

So staff grabbing someone in a store to apprehend them or stop them committing an offence?

Perfectly acceptable even if that resulted in your death unless they killed you on purpose.

Do the same outside- almost impossible to argue regarding force beng reasonable or necessary if someone is merely legging it with your goods

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmm,

 

Won’t say you’re wrong but as a practitioner, you are in a public place, end of, reasonable force, not a leg to stand on, they can search you but you can insist they do it in public, my point is that you do not have to go into an office, walk further into the shop and start shedding clothes to prove you have no more property, their grounds have gone,,,publicly shame them 😳

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hello everyone. I just wanted to update you as you were all kind enough to give me advice and reassurance earlier this year on this thread.

 

As of now (over 3 months) I have not received anything further since Letter 3 from DWF.

I am hoping that is the end of it.

 

On a personal note, I have changed jobs and am in a much happier place, cannot believe this was me reading the original post... thanks again all for not judging and helping.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks..we don't judge not what we are here for...

we just hate these fleecers and DCA's that sometimes blindly spoof people out of money they have no legal right too and use it to go away on holiday with....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm so glad that you are in a better place. I hope in some way we have helped and that you use your new knowledge in a positive way.

 

 

I wish you the best of luck.

 

 

CAG depends on donations. If you feel we have helped you, please consider a donation so that we can help others

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...