Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It already is epidemic. perhaps he meant the next stage ... pandemic.   https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dsepd/ss1978/lesson1/section11.html   media existing to sell newspapers / advertising space / looking to get viewer numbers ... who’d have thought it.   The media has a responsibility to give decent advice : appropriate concern rather than generating panic.
    • Latest update:   He managed to get through to BC before they closed earlier this evening. Last payment of £175.00 was 03/02/2014. Issue date for the claim 30th Jan 2020   Is he skewered? No supporting paperwork?   CCA and CPR waiting to go.   What next?   Thanks   stephenXL
    • Hi,   I'm looking for advice regarding a court claim being made against me by Erudio regarding an old student loan. I've received a claim through the Scottish Simple Procedure process for almost £4000 regarding a loan taken out in 1999. The original loan would have been for approximately £1800 to my best recollection.   I can't say for certain at the moment (will need to call SLC to verify) when the last time I deferred was - it was a long time ago and I've no recollection of sending anything at all to Erudio at any point, nor was I aware that they required a deferment form as well. I had been paying off my other student loans taken out a few years after this one (04, 05 and 06) through my earnings to the SLC even though I was under the repayment threshold at the time, and I've only earned over the repayment threshold for just over the past 2 years. I was happy enough for paying them off in this manner so I had never felt the need to continue to defer with the SLC, and never really paid much attention to the statements sent by Erudio as I'd incorrectly assumed that they would be paid through this manner as well. At this point, I have recently received a letter from the SLC stating that my loan repayments are coming to an end very soon, but it would appear that this hasn't made any payments towards the loan that Erudio have taken over.   I've been reading through the topics posted over the past couple of weeks for and reading about others in similar situations to try and ascertain the best plan of action.   Particulars of claim: (copied directly from the claim, account numbers and monetary values redacted)   Name the issuing court: Edinburgh Sheriff Court   Who Is The Claimant: Erudio Student Loans   Who Are the Solicitors: Shoosmiths LLC   What type of action? (Simple/Ordinary): Simple   Section D1: The claimants are a finance company which inter alia operates the business of debt purchasing. By virtue of a debt purchase agreement ("the Agreement") between claimants and Student Loans Company ("the Original Owner") dated 22/11/13, the claimant acquired title to and was assigned the right to payment in respect of all debts and other monetary claims of any nature due at the date of agreement, and in particular in relation to the the contract hereinafter condescended upon. The said assignation was intimated to the defendant by way of written notice on or around 22/11/2013. The agreement between the respondent and the original owner upon which this action is based was regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Further information in relation to that agreement is contained in section D$, where we set out the sums due and the basis upon which they fell due. As at the date thereof, the sum due in terms if the said agreement amounts to £xxxx.xx.   Section D4: The said contract agreement between the Original Owner and the respondent is a regulated credit agreement in terms of section 189 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. It is also regulated by the relevant Education (Student Loans) Acts and related regulations. It is dated 26/10/1999, and relates to a Student Loan Agreement with the account number xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. The said agreement required the respondent, following completion of their course of study, and upon meeting certain conditions relating inter alia to their income , to make payment of the sums due by the way of consecutive monthly installments. The said installments were required to commence in the April following the respondent meeting certain income criteria and were to be based upon a percentage of the respondent's income over the said threshold amount. It was a term of said agreement that a failure to meet any installment on a due date would render the account in default and would entitle the claimant to serve a notice of default on the respondent requiring the respondent to remedy the breach within 14 days which failing the claimant would be entitled to demand repayment of the loan in full. On or around 22/04/2019 the respondent failed to make payment of the sum which had fallen due and the said account thereby entered into default. A default notice was issued to the Respndent on 22/04/19. The Respondent failed to remedy the default following upon service of the said notice and the account was terminated in accordance with that notice. The account remains in default. The sum due in thereunder is due and payable now. As at the date hereof, the sum due in the terms of said agreement amounts to £xxxx.xx. In terms of the Agreement, and the written notice hereinbefore condescendedupon, the right to receive payment of the sums due in terms of the said account vests in the Claimant.   Date of raised claim [or court stamp date from writ] :- 23rd Jan 2020   Last Date Of Service [or from form 07]:- 17/02/2020 - this was delivered before then.   Last Date For Response [or from form 07]:- 09/03/2020   What Documents are listed in Box E2:[or in your form requesting the same?] A copy of the credit agreement, statements of account and notice of assignation will be produced in any defended process to follow hereon.   Is the claim for ......an Overdraft, credit card, loan account, HP Agreement, Catalogue or mobile phone debt? :- Student Loan     BOX D5 what has the claimant stated: IN FULL or [Pleas in law from the writ] I want the court to order the respondent to pay me the sum of £xxxx.xx …..   from your knowledge: answer the following:   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After 2007, started the course approx 1998, loan taken out 26/10/1999 as per the info they gave me   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.:- Debt purchaser (Erudio), Shoosmiths LLP   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not to my recollection although I was aware that Erudio had been sending statements regarding a student loan   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Possibly but not to my knowledge   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Possibly but not to my knowledge   When was you last payment:- Uncertain, will need to confirm with SLC if payments made towards this loan, no payments ever made to Erudio to the best of my recollection   Why did you cease payments:- Was paying off student loans through earnings, never realised that this one was being treated seperately   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Not to my knowledge, SLC had taken payment through my earnings even though I was below the threshold as I hadn't deferred but I was happy to proceed with this.   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No     From the previous advice given, I'll get the CCA request done and also the CPR 34.14. The amount claimed seems very high and I've got no breakdown of how they have come to this figure. I've also been reading through the threads about how to set out the defence - the PercyPercy thread is of particular interest as there are similarities between the two, as I never gave any paperwork sent to me due attention and have ended up in this situation as a result.   Thanks in advance, and I'll supply additional info as quickly as possible if required.    
    • Hi everyone    I received a ParkingEye claim form today that was issued on the 24/02/2020.   I'm not sure what info I need to upload on a parking charge claim form so I’ll upload the form and wait for instructions.    Any help much appreciated    Andrew      Claim Form.pdf
  • Our picks

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 748 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

My case is turning quite complex and I would appreciate any support anyone has for me.

 

I will try and lay everything out as clearly as possible...

 

1) Viewed a property on the 21st of October, and noticed some issues with the property (cracks on the outside walls), we asked the estate agent who said it was just “common shrinkage”. As the current tenants were in with furniture / laundry around we didn’t see the full extent of this.

 

2) The following week we decided to make an offer on the property, and stated that “this offer is contingent on the following: …”. Our contingencies included: a professional clean, painting over some obvious large internal cracks, resealing mould in bathroom and cleaning the garden. The landlord confirmed in writing to do the contingencies before our move in date. We also asked for an inventory, and received a list of items, before going ahead with putting in our deposit etc.

 

3) Upon moving out of my rented flat and into the property 6 weeks later (25th of November), we discovered that 1) no work that our offer was contingent on had been completed and 2) Two 12L dehumidifiers had been placed into the bedrooms (RRP: £139.99), alongside 9x mould absorbency gels dotted around the flat, indicating that there was a mould / damp problem in the flat (neither the dehumidifiers or gels were in the flat advertisement, nor were they present when viewing).

 

4) I have severe Asthma and a mould allergy, and my boyfriend has also been to hospital with a mould allergy in the past, so obviously had we known there was an issue we would not have made any offer on the flat.

 

5) We immediately got in touch with the estate agent in writing, who stated the dehumidifiers were there upon viewing (not the case). The dehumidifiers were also not included in the inventory we received (although that included kettle/toaster and other small appliances). Irrespective of that none of the work the landlord said they would do was done. In addition, I immediately begun suffering from my allergies in the flat due to mould / damp (asthma, hives etc).

 

6) Once we were in the flat without the previous tenants’ belongings, we began to see many more issues in there that were concealed by the previous tenants furniture and items on walls (e.g. cracks in internal walls that were concealed) as well as many probable hazards with the flat (e.g. excessive cold, windows not shutting properly, suspected subsidence and suspected penetrative damp / mould).

 

7) We got in contact with the estate agent the evening we moved in. The estate agent denied all of the above and stated that the dehumidifiers were there upon viewing (they weren’t). There was some back and forth over the next 24hrs but the consensus from the estate agent and landlord was that nothing was wrong with the flat and that we were not misled. We asked to know what would happen with the flat and the estate agent told us that landlord “believed and understood the property was in a fine state of repair from the outset”.

 

8) After moving in on the Saturday the 25th Nov, and getting nowhere with the estate agent/landlord we decided for our health (mine especially – I had gone through a full inhaler and multiple antihistamines in the 24 hours I had been there) to leave the flat as we realised we had been sold a lie, it was clear the landlord wasn’t going to do anything and we could not stay due to our health.

 

9) We moved our belongings into storage at the earliest opportunity (Monday the 28th Nov) and went to stay with family so we didn’t have to live there and struggle health wise. We also received an email from the estate agent that the landlord was going to re-let the property with a different estate agent and that we would get 24h notice before any viewings take place. That email was the last we heard from either the landlord or the estate agent.

 

10) 5 days later we went back to the property and realised we had been locked out (they had used a lock to which we were not provided a key) so could not gain access to the property even if we did want to remain in the contract.

 

11) We also realised the landlord had been negligent on a number of other things: Hadn’t given us prescribed information on the deposit, had put the deposit in the wrong scheme (i.e. not the one they put in our AST), we had no gas safety certificate, and there was further misrepresentation (said there was a fridge freezer and chest freezer, there was neither).

 

12) We tried to contact them and were ignored. Finally, we sent a pre-action protocol letter outlining our claim and restating that we were open to negotiate rescission of the contract and our monies paid back. This was ignored.

 

13) 14 days later we filed a court claim against the landlord which included all the money we paid and damages (around 7k) and also the fines for them not giving us the proper prescribed information (£6.6k) so our case is currently in the fast track (we found out after this may not be the best thing).

 

14) The landlord is now defending and counterclaiming (we are waiting for the details of their defence and counterclaim in the post but assuming this is for loss of rent up to the new tenant move in date, irrespective of the illegal eviction).

 

15) One last point is that the MCOL apparently made a clerical error and accidentally discontinued our claim on the 17th of Jan without telling us, and we spent the last week or so reinstating it.

 

I am now unsure of what our next steps should be so any advice on what you think we should do would be hugely appreciated.

 

Thank you all!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi and Welcome to CAG

 

 

I have moved your thread to the appropriate forum ( Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Forum) for advice...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget about the 6k for putting the deposit in the "wrong scheme".

As long as it was protected in one of the recognised schemes, the LL did protect it as far as i understand.

He should have sent you the info within 30 days, but I'm not too sure you can claim for this failure considering that you left and had no more contact with him and letting agent.

Your claim sounds reasonable about being misled, but you can only claim for actual loss.

Did you lose 7k?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thank you for your reply!

Ok - we sent the deposit over before we moved in, if that makes a difference?

7k is probably low balling, as we had to take time off work and we have receipts for everything, including having our belongings in storage since November 27th (we haven't claimed for anything we don't have receipts for). We also have not claimed for things like emotional distress etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We also have not claimed for things like emotional distress etc.

 

Which you couldn’t claim for, anyway, unless you could quantify a specific loss or had a diagnosed psychiatric illness resulting.

 

Does your claim have to be in excess of £10,000?

If you decide you are unlikely to be awarded more than £10k, the small claims track is more attractive in terms of costs protection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. I don't think they necessarily have to protect your deposit with the same scheme listed in the tenancy agreement. So you may lose this claim if they have protected your deposit and given you Prescribed Information. However, some of the deposit protection schemes are quite strict about some of their rules, so worth checking carefully.

 

I use the DPS whose rules are pretty relaxed - they provide an automatically-generated PDF that the landlord has to give to the tenant. On the other hand, I know that at one time another scheme *required* certain terms to be included within the contract.

 

2. The lack of gas safety certificate does not help you much compensation-wise.

 

3. You have to think about proving your case:

* Do you have proof that the work you requested was not done? And was failure to do the work sufficient to cancel your tenancy?

* Do you have proof of your ill health?

* Do you have proof that the property suffered from damp?

 

4. I would have thought the rapidity with which the landlord and agent said they would re-let and then locked you out of the property was good evidence that they also rescinded your tenancy. So even if you lost all of your case you should be limited to paying the re-letting costs and rent till the property is re-let.

 

It is surprising that they acted so quickly. Did you put them under a lot of pressure?

 

5. I'm assuming your large claim has meant you have paid a lot of court costs. The court hearing will also be expensive. You could look at your options for modifying the claim so it is covered by the small claims track.

 

My gut feeling is that *proving* damp, and *proving* that the damp caused your ill health within one day, is difficult. If so, possibly the best you can hope for is to get your rent/deposit back because the agreed work was not done and because you and the landlord agreed, so quickly, that the property was not right for you.

 

One of your options will be to accept the offer of a free conciliation service.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steve,

Thanks so much for your response. So in answer to your questions:

1) Thanks - The deposit was with DPS (however on the AST they said it was with My deposits), however we did not receive a PDF, we also didn't know if it was protected or who it was protected with, so called the deposit schemes until we found where it had been.

2) Ok about about gas safety, I guess it was just another thing they had not done properly

 

3)

a. We have proof the work wasn't done, and we stated that our offer was "contingent" on them, however obviously our main issue was with the damp problems

b. I can proof this as I had to get an emergency inhaler (have the prescription) on the Tuesday after moving out, I also have multiple doctors allergy notes / information / antihistamine prescriptions on my allergy. My partner was in hospital with a fungal related infection from mould in the past which we are currently getting a letter to show this.

c. We have photos of damp.water in the walls and black mould on the walls, plus photos of the dehumidifiers and multiple mould gels that were added to the property when we moved in

 

4. We said we felt we had been misled due to the addition of the dehumidifiers and mould items which were not there when we viewed or in the inventory, that we wouldnt have taken the property due to our health concerns and that we couldnt live there due to the damp and mould problems and the effect they would have on us. We asked for our money back and removals costs, but that was it. Initially the Estate agent said he would give us a refund the next day but seemed to change his mind, as when we went to the estate agency the next day it was closed with the shutters down! We also asked to speak to the landlord directly but the estate agent and landlord refused to give us her address stating "data protection"... not sure if that would count as much pressure? What do you think? We also only gave the keys back on the Saturday (5 days after moving our stuff out of the property), after we went back to the property to find we had been locked out, and after going back to the estate agency to find it shut and the agent not responding to us.

 

To be clear we never said we wanted to end the contract or move out, we just asked for the contract to be rescinded, however neither the estate agent or landlord contacted us about this after our final email on the Tuesday 30th Nov saying that there were no issues with the property and that they would let us know if there are any viewings (which they didn't). We also know that KFH held viewings in the property on the Wednesday as we called KFH who stated that they had been showing people around on the Wednesday, and were doing more viewings that week. So basically we didn't really know what was happening and no one was responding to us.

 

5. Yeah I think this is true, however couldn't the landlord just say no to any amendments and try to pressure us with the costs? Also the amendments cost another £250 to go direct to the court. What do you think may be the best option here?

 

 

What is the free concillation service??

 

Thanks for your help

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't no, however I am not sure how easy the process will be to get it under 10k now it has gone through...?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Which you couldn’t claim for, anyway, unless you could quantify a specific loss or had a diagnosed psychiatric illness resulting.

 

Does your claim have to be in excess of £10,000?

If you decide you are unlikely to be awarded more than £10k, the small claims track is more attractive in terms of costs protection.

 

Sorry just realised I responded incorrectly.... It doesn't no, however I am not sure how easy the process will be to get it under 10k now it has gone through...?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. For information, the DPS provide a 17 page PDF document comprising the Prescribed Information. It contains about 4 pages of personal information and information about the deposit, and the rest are the detailed DPS terms and conditions. From the date you pay your deposit the landlord has 30 days to issue you with this information.

 

3. Good that you have these photos. I guess ideally the property should be reported to the council so they can inspect it. The council may not be inclined to do so now that you have moved out.

 

Not sure of the legal processes for changing your claim. It's also a bit unclear as to how much of your claim is for rent and how much is for losses (storage etc).

 

One approach could be to write to the landlord indicating that if you are able to come to agreement which simplifies his claim, that this will result in reducing his risk of legal costs.

 

Certainly the Court would expect you to try and resolve the situation. For example, it seems clear they have locked you out, so there should be no argument about returning your rent from the point they locked you out. Assuming 30 days have passed it is clear they have not protected your deposit properly, so they should at least return it.

 

One way would be to write requesting return of your rent and deposit now that they have accepted that the contract is rescinded (by locking you out and telling you it is being re-let).

 

My personal view is that you will need to come across as rational and practical (and I get the impression that is what you are doing). I recently helped a friend with a claim and while he won the claim he would have won more if the issue between him and the other party had not become personal and aggressive (even though all of the aggression and 60% of the personal issues were due to the other party).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Steve. So...

1. We still haven't received anything on the Deposit, the only information we received was about the My Deposit scheme (which isn't where it was held), so they have definitely missed the 30 day window on that.

 

3. We did get in touch with the council, and the day the council said they could come was the week after we were locked out. We then called the council and they said they would not come... I am inclined to believe this may be why we were locked out.

 

I think that is a good option, we are also thinking we will try and get the deposit back through the DPS scheme and then taking it out of the claim.

 

We have repeatedly contacted the landlord via post (first through the agency and then once we got her address) and they have not responded (we have proof of our letters too). We also still don't have their solicitor contact details. However, I think we will try the resolution approach... I just do not know what they have in their defense / counterclaim, but maybe we would seem more reasonable if we put the offer there....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone,

So we have decided to take the following action:

1) ask the court to allow us to amend the claim

2) get in touch with the landlord again to see if they will agree to discuss a settlement / discuss something with us

3) get in touch with the deposit scheme and try and dispute that through them

4) extend the life of the claim due to the clerical error with MCOL (they accidentally discontinued our claim mid Jan without telling us. We only realised last week, and spend a week trying to resolve that)

 

I will post again with any updates but if you have any other ideas then do let me know!

 

Thank you for your help :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The court wouldn't be impressed if you didn't try to recover your deposit via DPS first, so do that first.

I still don't understand how you would cumulate £7k losses in a day.

One month rent in advance is what you can claim for.

Removal and storage for a reasonable time, not until case is resolved.

So the question you will be asked is: After you left the property, did you look for another place to rent?

You can't claim storage fees for months and months to come.

Taking time off work: why did you? Illness? How long did it last? Is it documented? Having a prescription doesn't prove anything.

I can get a morphine prescription with a phone call because of a condition that occurs randomly, but that doesn't prove i have symptoms.

Did you see a doctor?

So again, how do you get to the £7k figure?

It seems excessive for one day rent so you need to provide a detailed breakdown of actual losses considering that the contract was terminated when you left and the LL can't pay your expenses indefinitely.

More details please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for your reply.

We are now trying to get the deposit via DPS. I imagine the landlord will dispute this though.

 

After we left the property we moved in with family as we wanted to keep costs low, and to be honest we didn't really know what to do.

 

We both took the Monday off work to move our stuff out so it wouldn't get covered in mould (what I am allergic too), but we did not surrender the contract/ say that we were moving out / abandon the property for more than 21 days, as it says in our AST, hence why we went back that weekend to try and find out what was going on with the property... then we found out we had been locked out with a mortice lock that we had not been given the keys for, and the estate agent we had was closed. This is when we decided to return the keys to the estate agency.

 

Also, on the Wednesday 2 days after leaving the property, we called KFH who confirmed they had been showing people around the property and would be doing more viewings during the week. We had not been given any notice of this (even though the estate agent told us they would give us 24h notice, which was the last correspondence we heard from the landlord / agent), nor did they get in contact with us / respond to us to ask if we had left the property. Which is odd as we made it clear we were not surrendering the property.

 

I did not go and see a doctor no, but I did go to the pharmacy who gave me another inhaler and antihistamines, I also have proof of a mould allergy... but again like you say we would then need to prove mould in the property which we don't want to have to do, as the reason we left was due to being misled.

 

Does that help?

 

Thanks again smile.gif

Edited by Mr.P
Deleted financial breakdown

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It helps understanding that you have to review your calculations.

Firstly, you cannot fine anyone, only a court of law can or authorities with such legal power, surely not an individual.

 

Unless you have strict prove that this is what you earn, the judge will kick you out of the courtroom faster than a thunder.

8 weeks storage ~£500?

Most storage facilities charge a lot less than that and i use different units, some very large, for a fraction of that.

You need to mitigate your losses otherwise the LL can say you deliberately inflated them vexatiously or negligently.

I'm not too sure you can claim for the weekend away either.

Being upset about something is not good excuse to forfeit a holiday and even travel insurance won't cover that.

As you didn't seek medical attention you can't prove you were too ill to go on holiday.

So overall you can claim £XXk for rent paid, moving charges, Uber, and at a stretch storage for a month.

Loss of earning to tally your documentable loss, i.e. Payslip.

Deposit could become claimable if you're not able to recover it via DPS.

If it makes it to court you'll be asked if you were actively looking for another accommodation and why it took you so long to find one.

Counter argument could be that you wanted to make a profit out of this, especially looking at your figures.

On a separate note, you follow the pre-action protocollink3.gif and that's great, i hope you sent your communication via recorded delivery / proof of postage / email.

I know all of this sounds negative, but you have to wear defendant's shoes to build a good case.

 

Admin note: Removed specific costing at the request of the OP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, that helps, thanks.

 

Ok that makes sense re: the claim - we can amend that alongside the deposit fine.

 

With the loss of earnings we have payslips of day rates etc so we can show that.

We just used a big yellow storage company as it was the closest storage facility, that is how much it was for furniture etc for a large enough space, we got the first month half price too.

 

We have also sent everything recorded delivery so we have that re: the pre-action protocol.

 

What about the admin fee?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I meant the fine...

Hi, that helps, thanks.

 

Ok that makes sense re: the illegal eviction fine- we can amend that alongside the deposit fine.

 

ol.

 

What about the admin fee?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be blunt bema2017, but with a combined net income of almost £xxxk between you and your partner, why didn't you seek legal advice and saved time?

If your time is that valuable, it would be best used to make close to £1k a day rather than waste time on the internet where you're only going to get educated guesses at best and wild opinions at worst.

Don't forget that even if you win, it is not guaranteed that you will recover your money.

The LL might have no assets whatsoever and the property mortgaged up to the bones on an interest only basis.

I personally call a moral victory a loss if it wastes time and money without producing results.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, sadly that is not the case or we wouldn't be in this mess! Day rates come and go depending on work.

 

During the time dealt with the landlord / estate agent / they were responding to us, we just wanted our money back, and still do. However we have been ignored since November 25th, hence why we took legal action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi, sadly that is not the case or we wouldn't be in this mess! Day rates come and go depending on work.

 

During the time dealt with the landlord / estate agent / they were responding to us, we just wanted our money back, and still do. However we have been ignored since November 25th, hence why we took legal action.

 

In that case you can't claim a potential loss.

You have to calculate your daily rate based on average income.

Best done using your p60 from last year or self assessment if self employed.

Look at this in this way: A car dealer can't claim £20k for a missed day at work by saying that he would have potentially sold a supercar.

His loss would be limited to his average daily income based on a calculation of his documentable tax return or p60 if employed.

So again, you have to redo your calculations and amend the claim otherwise the LL would most likely try to convince the court that you're out to make money, not recover losses.

Frankly i would contact them and let them know that you have made a mistake in the figures, because in your lba you claimed a large amount of money and that's why they ignored it, safe in the knowledge that you couldn't claim for that much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In that case you can't claim a potential loss.

You have to calculate your daily rate based on average income.

Best done using your p60 from last year or self assessment if self employed.

Look at this in this way: A car dealer can't claim £20k for a missed day at work by saying that he would have potentially sold a supercar.

His loss would be limited to his average daily income based on a calculation of his documentable tax return or p60 if employed.

So again, you have to redo your calculations and amend the claim otherwise the LL would most likely try to convince the court that you're out to make money, not recover losses.

Frankly i would contact them and let them know that you have made a mistake in the figures, because in your lba you claimed a large amount of money and that's why they ignored it, safe in the knowledge that you couldn't claim for that much.

 

 

Ah I see - thanks.

We were planning on amending the case today anyway to remove deposit / illegal eviction fine, so can take that out as well and P60 it.

 

With regards to contacting them we have tried to arrange a discussion but have since been ignored, do you think it is worth contacting once more on the claim total?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, in writing.

They might be more inclined to speak to you once the claim becomes reasonable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you dont choose the quantum of damages for an unprotected deposit, the court does so glad you are removing that, it could have lost you every penny of the rest of your claim even if the whole was successful

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...