Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Recommended Topics

  • Posts

    • Analysis: Klarna breaks the billion dollar revenue barrier View the full article
    • No it's not on my credit file, never has been either 🤷‍♂️
    • Ok thank you. So, am I implying correctly that even though I am overseas, and able to have any correspondence to the UK address forwarded to me, there is still a chance that bankruptcy proceedings could be brought against me?   Selling the property isnt really an option.    Also I'm a bit confused. In reply ~12 the advice is to get the defaults and let them run their six year course, but if I make small payments wouldnt that keep the clock running?
    • Well, we have also been done by Yewtree Cars/James Harrison! We bought a Land Rover Discovery from him off a dealer site on 28th December 2020. He advertised it as 1 loving owner (true, I tracked him down on Facebook, really nice guy!) throughout the advert WOW full dealership service history, WOW new cambelt, WOW new MOT, WOW full valet including decontamination clean WOW, WOW, WOW!!! We paid £4500 for the car plus £280 for delivery from Solihull to Winchester. He sent 3 texts reminding us to ‘look after the delivery guy cuz he’s a top man’! Soon worked out that HE was the delivery guy! They dropped the car off and scarpered. It was dark when it arrived, initial thoughts were it was disgusting inside. I have never seen such a filthy interior. He even left his sweet wrapper inside. He drove the vehicle down to us (we thought that we were paying for a transporter). It was running on fumes, so we took it out to get fuel. Straight away noticed automatic gearbox slipping. Not a good start. Next day messaged dealer asking for the receipt, twice, he said that he was in Dubai (in his dreams!) for 2 weeks but would send it when he got back.  Before he delivered the car, he said that if we weren’t happy he would personally come and collect it. Sent him a message (I like to keep proof of conversations) to say that we certainly weren’t happy and wanted to return it. His reply was - SOLD AS SEEN, YOU GOT A CHEAP CAR! Thinking we would have to cut our loses, we had a new gearbox put in, only to find that the crankshaft had also gone and then the bottom part of the engine had to be replaced. Also the suspension at the front was leaking oil (mentioned as an advisory on the previous mot, which he said had been done). He forged an entry in the service book saying that it had just had a cambelt change (false Land Rover stamp), confirmed by previous owner and Land Rover. So, after 8 weeks of being at the garage and £7000 - YES £7000! later we certainly did get a cheap car from him. Are we going to let this go? NO! I have found out his real name and I am going to pursue him through the court until I get this money back. He is the worst kind of confidence trickster, a lier and a thief. We will have no hesitation in scouring Solihull for him, whatever it takes.
    • You want to avoid any CCJ's, by ensuring all UK creditors have your current address abroad.  Also as dx suggests, making small payments based on current affordability would be wise.   Keeping the accounts running with original creditors bu making minimal payments, will give you time to consider options.   If it were myself in this position, I would be thinking how quickly could I get the tenants to vacate the UK property and how quickly could it be sold.  This would enable me to at least retrieve some equity after repaying any secured loan and the equity would then enable me to plan the next steps in my life.  I am not advocating walking away from debts, but I would be thinking, that if I end up with CCJ's or worse Bankruptcy, then with additional costs being added, I would have no money left.  And worse, if I had  to sell the property quickly, it may sell at a reduced price and I could still owe a debt after it had been sold.   So may be you should be getting some formal financial/legal advice in the near future, to see what you can do, to protects your interests as much as possible.    
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

VW supply non matching part , refused return


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1116 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

My son has a Mk 4 VW R32 ,( Fast Golf ) and as well as being a long term project in keeping it standard and in tip top condition ,it is also a money pit , but he loves the car .

His latest project came about because of a leak from the sun roof ,.

The leak caused staining and other damage to the head lining ,so having replaced seals to the sunroof , using the cars VIN number he ordered a new headlining , which was special order from the factory

 

The replacement head lining material is not a match to the rest of the interior trim ,” A” posts “B” posts and sunroof inner panel etc ,

 

VWs answer is that there may have been a specification change to the head lining , and could not guarantee that if he ordered the rest of the interior trim it would match the finish of the headlining .

 

Here is the crunch ,due special order ,

VW will not accept return ,

even though there is a mismatch with existing interior trim .

 

There was NO indication on the official VW parts list the dealer used to order the headlining to indicate that there was a change in specification or material type ,so at present my son has shelled almost £400 for a useless part .

 

Not fit for purpose ? or any other reason we can persuade VW to accept return.

 

It is a awkward situation as my son has ( up to now ) a good relationship with the dealership , having bought many parts to keep his pride and joy looking its best .

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was custom made then yes

But I feel by using the word special order

I think they might be trying to kid you that cra does not apply

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me that if there is a change of specification then it is implicit that the new specification will relate not only to the headlining but all the interior trim which would normally match if the vehicle had been new.

 

On this basis I think you have two possible arguments for saying that the supplied headlining is "defective/not fit/not matching description".

 

Firstly firstly is the fact that the VIN number relates to a particular specification and if the specification has changed away from the original then the part they have supplied does not match the description – the description being inherent in the original specification for the VIN number.

 

The second position is that there is an implied term that if the specification of the headlining is changed then so also has the specification of the associated matching parts – because otherwise who on earth would want to buy mismatched interior trim.

 

Clearly if the specification for the headlining has changed then there is not much your son can do about it. That will be the only part which is available to him. This means that he will have at least two compromise by agreeing to buy the remaining interior trim to match the headlining. If they can't supply matching headlining then I think that they are in breach of contract and this would be the way forward.

 

As for the good relations he has with the supplier, he may have to kiss that goodbye – although it would be unreasonable for the supplier which has a pride in its business to be non-sympathetic with somebody who simply wants to keep a vehicle looking good with matching trim.

 

If they want to fall out with him about this then it shows something about their general attitude that they can be lovely people when the weather is fair

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not custom made , standard VW part

 

Thanks for the quick reply BankFodder ,

My son is heartened by your reply ,

 

The Dealer has agreed to supply the rest of the trim at cost , the only stumbling block is again “special order “ and the problem of matching

 

I have suggested to him to make it a condition of the order , that any new parts of trim supplied should match the already purchased head lining , and if there not a match , to refuse to accept the parts.

 

To be continued

Link to post
Share on other sites
Firstly firstly is the fact that the VIN number relates to a particular specification

 

Although some digits within a VIN number refer to more general vehicle type and specification, a full VIN number is unique to one specific vehicle. There can be no two the same - otherwise Registration authorities would not accept or use VIN numbers as an identifier.

 

That being the case it seems the fault is not with the OP's Son or the Dealer but with VW themselves. VW, and only VW, created the vehicle, production records and VIN number. So either -

- VW production records were incorrect and did not match the vehicle they produced, or

- VW cocked up the order, or

- the VIN number was incorrectly transmitted between the Dealer to VW.

 

Assuming it was not the last, VW's 'smokescreen' response of a "special order" is irrelevant and just an attempt to squirm out of it. VW appear to be the cause of the error and the consequences falls on them.

 

Just as the Son doesn't want to sour his relationship with the Dealer, the Dealer depends on VW for his livelihood.

However, if it comes to a legal fight, the Son legal relationship was with the Dealer and the Dealer's legal relationship was with VW.

 

I think the OP's Son and the Dealer should conduct a combined approach to/against VW accordingly to obtain the correct specification part at no further cost.

If VW can no longer supply this they should admit their error and seek some satisfactory resolution with the OP's Son (via the Dealer).

Link to post
Share on other sites

As others have said really. Special Order does not mean Custom. It's a standard VAG part so there's nothing custom about it. The fact that it has to be ordered from Germany, special order or not, has got nothing to do with it. The dealer and/or VAG are trying to bamboozle.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently ordered a "special order" door interior trim for my 20yo VW and they sent the right part.

I don't think your son's headlining has been discontinued, they simply made a mistake in sending the wrong one and don't want to admit it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Common sense would dictate that if the new cloth couldn't be guaranteed to match the old one, this should have been indicated at point of order. I agree, they are trying to pull your chain. Keep at them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...