Jump to content
HP Mum

Supermarket -oap slipped on food - injury claim?

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Elderly relative slipped on food produce on supermarket floor. Very bad fall.

Immediately other customers came to help and they called over a store assistant to assist.

This assistant then put up one of the yellow "danger slippery surface" signs.

 

Relative had the presence of mind to use telephone to photograph what slipped on and the injury.

After a while relative managed to get up/ drive home and then go to the doctor. Its a rural quite old-fashioned GP and they told relative to come back if injury gets worse :-( (ie they were very busy and kind of couldn't deal with this type of complaint)

 

1 month later the bruising has subsided but the injury is still bad; causing problems. A possible fracture? Needs an x-ray to verify.

 

In the meantime relative had been expecting a call from the local branch to check injury ok - but never received any call. So relative instead wrote to the head office of supermarket and complained. The head office replied quite swiftly advising relative to return to the local branch for compensation: which turned out to be a bunch of flowers and a cheque for a nominal (tiny) value.

 

Given relative is elderly and vulnerable I am of the opinion that the flowers/tiny cheque value is a 'fob off'. Lots of elderly would be very happy with such "gifts". But relative is still in pain and may even have a fracture (can update on this after hospital) so I am wondering if we should write and thank them for the flowers and the cheque - but we are considering making an injury claim against them.

Is this how it works? See how they reply to such a letter from relative? Or just go straight to a lawyer to handle this issue?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which supermarket please?


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sainsbury's

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you get hold of a written report from the doctor and any follow-up medical evidence. Keep on seeing the doctors. Write to the supermarket and lay out exactly what happened, when it happened and the fact that they have not responded to you and so that you now wish formally to make a claim.

 

The only problem but this is working out the value. I suggest that you invite the insurer to carry out their own independent medical examination.

 

At the end it will depend on what you are prepared to do about it. They will try to put it into their insurer and it will take ages and there will be negotiation et cetera. If you wanted to happen more quickly then you would have to be prepared to bring a legal action in the County Court. Not difficult but your elderly relative would have to do be the person named and would have to go to court and maybe they don't feel up to it.

 

Whatever happens, you definitely to get your claim in formally to the supermarket and get a proper response from them.

 

Frankly if they don't respond within seven days then given the delay that they have already caused, I would then threaten legal action.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did i read that correctly ?

 

1 month later and suspecting a fracture they haven't yet been to the hospital for an X-ray ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

I think compensation request depends firstly on the outcome of the x-ray.

I will help relative with this.

I guess in meantime I could ask the store to forward cctv and accident log to relative?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

collin11 - yes you read that right!

 

This is fairly typical of rural GP's

- in this case the GP asked elderly relative if they thought they might have broken something!!

I mean seriously.

 

Most town GPs would send the patients straight off to hospital.

 

Plus elderly people don't like to make a fuss...

 

I suspect, having now seen the injury, that there is a hairline fracture.

 

So ok enough to walk on with pain but not enough pain to be an obvious break...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Take them to the hospital

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Elderly can be quite stubborn... But yes, that is the aim...

 

it is quite hard when someone says "I'm fine; I'm fine" and then you take a look and everything is very clearly not fine. Trying to gently hold their hand to do the correct things...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The important question here in terms of seeking compensation for injury :

has the supermarket breached its duty of care?.

 

So, if the “slippery produce” was dropped by a member of staff who then left it,

or someone had reported a hazard and the store staff had left it, knowing there was a hazard,

or even “supermarket put in the wrong flooring, leading to a known slip hazard that they don’t correct”

: breach of duty of care.

 

If, however,

the supermarket had records showing the aisles were regularly and frequently inspected for hazards,

and they claimed this showed that the produce must have been dropped almost immediately before the incident,

and they had done all that could be expected of a careful and responsible retailer

: no breach of duty of care, and no claim for negligence under the Occupiers Liability Act 1957.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As above

I think your elderly relative's health should be first and foremost

- if they think they've broken a bone they should really go to hospital.

 

As for making a claim for personal injury,

your claim should follow the pre-action protocol for low value pi claims (EL/PL)

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/protocol/pre-action-protocol-for-low-value-personal-injury-employers-liability-and-public-liability-claims .

 

If you instruct solicitors they will complete an electronic Claim Notification Form (CNF) and submit directly to the supermarket's insurers.

 

If you go it alone you'll still have to start the claim by sending a hard copy CNF to the Defendant's head office, and follow the process in the pre-action protocol.

 

If you just issue proceedings (bear in mind liability could well be disputed) without following the protocol, proceed through the litigation process and end up with a win in Court, you run the risk that the Court could impose a sanction for failing to follow the protocol (and that could take the form of a reduction in damages). Not a certainty but a risk.

 

Even if you don't follow that, there is still the pre-action protocol for personal injury.

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/protocol/prot_pic#3.1

 

If you submit a letter of claim to them,

they can issue a response and the protocol gives them 3 months to investigate liability and respond.

 

Notwithstanding the procedural aspects of making the claim,

the liability issues outlined by Bazza above still need addressing.

 

Sending a letter of claim should trigger them to investigate liability.

Investigating this as a litigant in person will require an investment of time and energy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You would need to contact the store / Customer Services and ask for the CCTV to be retained and disclosed, so you would be able to see who created the hazard and how long it was there, however, what bazzaS is correct


Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was over a month ago it is extremely unlikely the cctv exists unless you have advised them to keep a copy. Cctv is almost always deleted or over written every 30 days.

 

 

So you need to be fast.


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to relative it was vegetables that they slipped on.

Normally this vegetable would be packaged in a sealed plastic bag, pre-cut by the supermarket.

 

At some point a bag had been picked up, the bag broke and a couple of the contents spilled out.

 

No-one had picked up the spilled contents - neither customer nor sales staff And relative stepped on the veg and slipped.

 

I would suggest breach of duty of care.

The bag should not have split and someone should have picked up the spillage.

 

We would need to check time of accident against their cleaning logs

- but would they have specific records which show which aisle was cleaned at what time?

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

Persuaded relative to return to doctors / got a specialist referral / MRI booked / results this week. So far via NHS. Unsure of any future rehabilitation costs within or outside the NHS.

 

In meantime have written to supermarket and advised them, briefly, of the circumstances since the 'fall' - problems walking/ all doctor visits and scans etc. Just to keep them informed.

 

Have not yet suggested any form of litigation or personal injury claim - but I guess the mere fact have written to supermarket advising them of the circumstances does prepare them for a follow up pi claim??

 

Will update with the MRI results when get them

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

update - yes, the MRI confirms there is a split menisci in the knee. No arthritis. Consensus that cause is by fall, not by age degeneration.

Still great pain even lying down. There was no pain or problems walking before the fall.

Just trying to decide what to do next...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get the CCTV? Did you file an accident report with the store? Youll be hard pressed to win any claim if you dont get the proof


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All done properly. Thanks renegadeimp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now all you can do is wait . You can always get a PIL onto it, but you need to make sure all your ducks are in a row.


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

little update:

Supermarket have acknowledged the potential injury claim; have passed it on to their insurance company.

The insurance company has then written saying they have a legal obligation to investigate and reply within 40 days.

Is there anything we need to do in the meantime?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep a detailed log – a daily log as to the progress of the injury and the difficulties/problems involved in care and treatment.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bankfodder

Will tell relative now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

update:

there's been a few pingpong letters.

 

The supermarket has passed the relative's details on to a claim handler.

 

And relative has since received a letter from DWP - the compensation recovery unit.

Relative has actually never written they are making a claim - but obviously the intent has been shown.

Apparently if supermarket thinks a claim is being made they have to - by law - ask the Govt DWP if the injured party has received any benefits from the Govt. If the case gets settled and payment made to relative, the insurance company then has to repay DWP any benefits that have been paid as a direct result of the injury.

 

Not quite sure of our next steps...

Obv Supermarket is treating this seriously; as a claim. So will put our heads together and try figure what is best to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The report to the DWP is the correct procedure, any appropriate recoverable benefits paid to your relative will be deducted from their damages and paid to the DWP directly. The notification to the DWP will also bring to light any NHS charges which the Defendant will have to pay if liable (eg charges for X-rays, scans etc)

 

Has your relative considered instructing a solicitor yet? There are steps which need to be followed in bringing this claim as set out in the Civil Procedure Rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No benefits have been requested/ paid (yet)....

 

No solicitor instructed. Was potentially going to handle for relative???

Intend to research the procedures...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?





  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • can i put anything in the LBA about seeking any costs at this stage, for the amount of effort in trying to resolve?
    • if this is too long, basically i sent it in, they checked it over, they agreed with the store again, they sent it back, now i'm onto letter before action - as you suspected would happen       ok so i got hold of someone in customer services who asked for the bag to be sent in.   their response is, predictably:   I would like to confirm that I have now inspected your backpack and it is our belief that the issue is due to natural wear and tear and not an inherent manufacturing fault.   I will today return your backpack to you at our cost.   Please accept my sincere apologies for any disappointment caused.   to which i replied:   For a bag to suffer from natural wear and tear to the point of ripping in multiple places after only four months of use would surely suggest it was not of satisfactory quality nor fit for it's intended purpose?!?!   The Consumer Rights Act states:   (3)The quality of goods includes their state and condition; and the following aspects (among others) are in appropriate cases aspects of the quality of goods—   (a)fitness for all the purposes for which goods of that kind are usually supplied;   (b)appearance and finish;   (c)freedom from minor defects;   (d)safety;   (e)durability.     I would suggest the bag has been used in line with part 3a but that it has failed under part 3e and arguably part 3c.   Please reconsider your position on this. I would much prefer to avoid drawing this issue out any longer and do not relish the pursuit for costs should we be unable to reach an agreement without further action.   fast forward three days later i received the bag back and no reply.
    • Thanks for all your points above. Given me a little bit of an insight into what I am up against. My son moved into the property in August 2016 so it’s been nearly 3 years. Passed several inspections with minor ‘issues’ that have been put right and re-inspected fine.  I just feel the labour for a room to be decorated is going to be £20+ per hour and a new carpet will swallow the £500 deposit. are we legally entitled to obtain our own quotes as she is seemingly reluctant to allow us the keys back.  Have requested a photo of said stain in living room as it was wet when I left the property. 
  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
    • 30 Day Right To Reject - Vehicle Casualty Report. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415585-30-day-right-to-reject-vehicle-casualty-report/
      • 57 replies
×
×
  • Create New...