Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge .............. please fill out the Q&A ASAP. dx  
    • Well done on reading the other threads. If ECP haven't got the guts to do court then there is no reason to pay them. From other threads there is a 35-minute free stay after which you need to pay, with the signs hidden where no-one will read them.  Which probably explains why ECP threaten this & threaten that, but in the end daren't do court. As for your employer - well you can out yourself as the driver to ECP so the hamster bedding will arrive at yours.  Get your employer to do that using the e-mail address under Appeals and Transfer Of Liability.  
    • good you are getting there. Lloyds/TSb...i certainly would not be risking possible off-setting going on if a choice were there, but in all honestly thats obv too late now..., however..you might not never be in that situation so dont worry too much. regardless to being defaulted or not, if any debt that is not paid/used in 6yrs it becomes statute barred. you need to understand a couple of things like 'default' and 'default notice' a default is simply a recorded D in the calendar section/history of a debt, it does not really mean anything. might slightly hit your rating. the important thing here is a default notice , these are issued by the original creditor (OC) under the consumer credit act, it gives you 14 days to settle whatever they are asking, if you don't then they have the option to register a defaulted date on your credit file. that can make getting other credit more difficult. and hits your rating. once that happens, not matter what you do after that, paying it or not or not paid off or not, the whole account vanishes from your credit file on the DN's 6th b'day. though that might not necessarily mean the debt is not still owed - thats down to the SB date above. an OC very rarely does court and only the OWNER of a debt can instigate any court action (Attempted a CCJ) DCA's debt collection agencies - DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS they have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's TYPE. an OC make pass a debt to a dca as their client to try and spoof people into paying through legal ignorance of the above statement. an OC may SELL on an old debt to a DCA/debt buyer (approx 10p=£1) and then claim their losses through tax write off and their business insurance, wiping their hands of the debt. the DCA then becomes the debt OWNER. since the late 70's dca's pull all kinds of 'stunts' through threat-o-grams to spoof a debtor into paying them the full value of the debt, when they bought if for a discounted sum (typically 10p=£1). you never pay a dca a penny! if read carefully, NONE of their letters nor those of any other 'trading names' they spoof themselves under making it seem it's going up some kind of legitimate legal 'chain' say WILL anything....just carefully worded letters with all kinds of threats of what could/might/poss happen with other such words as instruct forward pass... well my dog does not sit when instructed too...so... DCA's SOMETIMES will issue a court claim, but in all honesty its simply a speculative claim hoping mugs wet themselves and cough up...oh im going to court... BIG DEAL DCA - show me the enforceable paperwork signed by me...9/10 they dont have it and if your defence is conducted properly, most run away from you . however before they do all that they now have to send a letter of claim, cause the courts got fed up with them issuing +750'000PA speculative claims and jamming up the legal system. so bottom line is two conclusions.... if you cant pay a debt, get a DN issued ASAP (stop paying it!) make sure it gets registered on your file then it stops hurting your file/future credit in 6yrs regardless to what happens (bar of course a later DCA CCJ - fat chance mind!)  once you've a registered DN , then look into restarting payments if the debt is still owed by the OC, if SOLD to a DCA, don't pay - see if they issue a letter of claim (then comeback here!).        
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hoist/Cohen Claimform - Ex Barclaycard mediation planned - what to expect please help!


Josh2017
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2293 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

simply because debt collection and debt buying is the biggest monetary sector of the whole finance industry.

 

some 750'000 speculative claimforms are issued every year...

 

85% go uncontested resulting in a default rubbestamped judgement whereby no human checks anything.

 

its a numbers game.

 

if everyone [YES YOU TOO!!] stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the whole industry would totally collapse over night.....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea why you think that you would gain any advantage from going to mediation.

 

Have you not read any of the things that we have said here in the past about mediation – about how unsuitable it is?

 

Have you not even looked at the official advice relating to mediation - https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Guidance/civil_court_mediation_service_manual_v3_mar09.pdf ? Even this official guide at page 9 makes it clear that mediation is probably not suited to cases involving simple debt.

 

Have you done any reading or any preparation?

 

I would suggest that you cancel the mediation. Contact the mediation service in writing and also the claimant in writing – you may as well just copy them in – and make it clear that you are not prepared to enter into any mediation unless they provide you with a proper copy of the CCA – as outlined by site team member DX above. Tell them very clearly that in the meantime you deny that you are indebted to them as they allege and this will continue to be your position until they can prove evidence of the debt by providing a signed CCA.

 

If there is no CCA – then there is no enforceability – and there is absolute nothing to be gained by you from mediation. Of course the other side have a huge amount to gain from a mediation on this unenforceable debt because they will attempt to get you to agree and to sign up to some kind of scheme of repayment.

 

Cancel the mediation in writing and explain why and tell them that once you receive the CCA then you will have a look at your options. In the meantime you consider that the debt is unenforceable and you are ceasing all payments.

 

Send them a statutory request for a CCA – I think it costs £1.

 

I also suggest that you write to them formally and send them an amended defence.

 

 

The defence should be set out with the header that you used in the one that you have already supplied. It should simply headed "amended defence"

 

And it should say:

 

The defendant denies that he is indebted as alleged by the claimant or at all.

 

The claimant has failed to provide a signed copy of the Consumer Credit Act agreement.

 

Statement of truth

 

Signed, dated

this is what you should have supplied in the first place and saved everybody a load of problems.

 

 

Incidentally, I see that you have been on the phone to them. Presumably you haven't recorded your calls?

 

Also, a word on the defence that you have supplied. It is verbose and immediately flags up to the other side that you have no idea what you're talking about and you are easy prey. This is probably one of the reasons why they jumped at the chance of getting you into a mediation.

 

Apart from anything else, your frequent use of the phrase (or thereabouts) "I do not recall…" Is completely unsuitable for a solid defence. It demonstrates that you are in doubt as to what you say and if it ever came before a judge, this very clear doubt that you have admitted to having will form the basis of a judgement against you.

 

I'm sorry to say that not only is the defence verbose but it is also an attempt to be formal and to adopt what you imagine is the legal vernacular. In fact this is the kind of language that I see used by student solicitors who are still doing their legal practice courses and still walk around as if they have a stick up their derriere.

 

In future, please come here before you start getting involved in any of this kind of thing. You will save yourself a lot of trouble – and also us as there will be fewer problems for us to sort out for you.

 

Geddit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just noticed the address on the t`s and c`s was not the correct address at time of execution of the credit agreement

 

good spot too.

 

just cancel mediation Monday

 

the defence is one of andyorch std ones and if fine for the old mkdp ex BC claimforms.

 

don't also forget hph2 [the hoist group] purchased mkdp group in 2013

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bankfodder,

 

Thank you very much for your input and information I take on board what you say and yes with hindsight I should have played things out differently and came to you guys first.

 

The reason why I ticked yes to mediation was down to the fact last time this happened to me I was told to agree to mediation from a member of this site so assumed this was standard delay tactics.

 

The telephone calls I had with the claimant were not recorded although should I ever have to contact them again sure I will record for future reference.

 

With regard to the defence, This defence I used was copied from a claim I had previously been involved with that never made it to court, the claim was put together for me by a team member so I simply amended it and cut out the parts that had no relevance to this claim assuming what was good for one would be good for another similar case.

 

I have done lots of reading regarding mediation, claims and similar cases but none of what I read made me think I had to handle this claim differently to what I had been recommended to do previously,

 

In future I will leave this to the experts who deal with it daily, thank you for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help DX you had a late night mainly down to me and it was appreciated, did you manage to remove the sensitive info that i left on the pdf`s by mistake or would you like me to re submit them with it blacked out?

 

The defence was one i copied from Andy that gave me the outcome I wanted the last time I was involved in a claim.

 

Bankfodder / dx

 

Just to clarify my next steps:

 

Send a cancellation request off to mediation / Claimant Monday stating the reason:

 

"I am not prepared to enter into any mediation unless the claimant can provide me with a proper copy of the original signed CCA and I deny that I am indebted to the claimant as alleged and this will continue to be my position until the claimant can prove evidence of the debt by providing a signed CCA.

Once I receive the CCA I will look at my options, In the meantime I consider that the debt is unenforceable and I am ceasing all payments"

 

I will enclose a £1 payment within the claimants envelope and request a statutory request for a CCA for the alleged debt.

 

Do I need to make reference to the year the agreement was allegedly made (2000) stating a reconstituted agreement is not sufficient as a CCA?

 

With regard to the amended defence I will use the following defence added by bankfodder:

 

Amended Defence

 

The defendant denies that he is indebted as alleged by the claimant or at all

 

The claimant has failed to provide a signed copy of the consumer credit act agreement

 

statement of truth

 

with signature and date.

 

I will send this off to the claimant solicitors, do I need to send this off to the courts too? I have already submitted my defence deveral weeks ago.

 

If the claimant is unable to provide a copy of the original agreement what is likely to happen?

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'll be doing the docs today

its not an issue anyway as those that need to see them can anyway.

 

I wouldn't bother amending your defence ...

costs too much and changes little

 

just send our std CCA request to the claimant today.

 

sorry you've already sent a CCA request once you got the claimform

theres no need for a second one.

 

I would simply ring mediation Monday and cancel

nothing more needed

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will cost you £255 to submit an amended defence and possible costs from the claimant..it must be done by way of n244 application notice and you will also have to seek the claimants permission.

 

The defence you have submitted is tried and tested with 1000s of discontinued claims in the Financial Legal Success forum.

 

Mediation will cancel anyway...once you inform them they are still in default of your section 78 request.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

ofcourse I meant wouldn't bother...:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

to eventually run away

go read the like claims here already.

 

on a recon agreement and the fake 620000 T&C's they usually do.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Guys for your help,

 

What am I hoping will be the next stage by the claimant after mediation is cancelled?

 

It proceeds .......you refer to your Notice of allocation and comply with the directions....submission of a witness statement and standard disclosure in preparation for the hearing date.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...