Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all,   It's been a while since I last posted.   We were due to fly LHR - Mex - Lap (return) with AeroMexico on May 2nd.   The flights were booked with Netflights (owned by dnata).   We have requested a refund from Netflights who have stated they will only issue our refund when (and if) they receive a refund from AeroMexico. 😡   Can anybody tell me who my contract of sale is with, Netflights or the airline?   Is this even relevant?    Who should be refunding me?   Thank you for any help.   Regards.
    • All Talk Talk Direct debits/standing orders, etc were all cancelled correctly and set up for BT. Talk Talk took the money from my debit card details which they had retained. I have now blocked this too. I just want my money back!
    • On the basis it was a direct debit from the bank. Why did you not use the DD guarantee and insist the bank refunds the money.     
    • Basically i can claim for my excess and loss of earnings as i was self employed and cost for hire of van, solicitors have asked for uninsured losses, if lossess are not included in claim i cant recover them at later date the letter states.  
    • Hi All,   On 26th May this year I called my broadband/phone service provider, Talk Talk, to inform them that I would be leaving them and moving to BT at the end of the month.  My contract with Talk Talk had officially ended back in October 2019 and I was just paying them on a monthly basis for continued service. I was advised that I did not need to do anything, as arrangements would be made on my behalf to keep my existing number etc between Talk Talk and BT.  I began my contract with BT on 1st June.  I cancelled my bank payment arrangements to Talk Talk and set up new ones for BT. I then received a bill from Talk Talk for June's monthly charges, which I ignored as I was no longer a customer, I owed them nothing, and they were not providing me with any kind of service. I then received a second bill from Talk Talk for July's monthly charges. I called Talk Talk to explain their error but they insisted that I was still a customer using their services.  This was despite me proving that I have been a BT customer for the past two months and paying BT for services that Talk Talk are claiming to be theirs. Talk Talk then took £60.39 from my bank account on 2nd August, despite having no authority or consent from me to do so.  I complained to my bank and they explained that utility companies hold on to customers payment details (despite GDPR) and this practice is common.  I have now instructed my bank to refuse any further payments to Talk Talk, by any means!. I phoned Talk Talk to complain and insist they repaid my money immediately as it had been obtained fraudulently and they are not providing any service to me anymore.  The adviser couldn't help much, but promised me a call from a manager later in the week.  The call never materialised. I called Talk Talk myself today, and after nearly four hours of phone calls, being put on hold, transferred, being made promises and making more calls, I have got nowhere. One manager did offer a token £30 payment which I obviously turned down.  I eventually hung up after being put on hold for over 20 minutes during a call lasting over an hour. These people are ignorant at best and impossible to deal with. Please could someone advise me on how to get my £60.39 back from these people?  
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 9 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies
style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 942 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Can a company who placed a charging order on our property stop me from selling please?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you checked the land registry to see what kind of charging order they have put on it?

When you say "Our Property?"


 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I own a joint property with husband.

We were under a DMC who made payments.

These were all made on time at the amount agreed by the companies.

 

The C/O was for an alleged credit card debt in my husbands name.

The Credit card company got Eversheds to deal then first revenue ,

back to Eversheds and a couple more.

 

The reference numbers were all different and to be honest it was a right mess.

My husband received court papers stating he hadn't paid.

 

We contacted the DMC who said sign the court paper forward to them they would fill in and do the necessary as they knew we had paid.

He signed the papers and ticked box to say we would be defending it.

 

they got a CCJ 14 days later a charging order.

We sacked the DMC company.

 

The charging order was for an incorrect amount and later amended.

I wrote to all creditors and dealt with it ourselves.

 

As a joint owner the company sent me a copy of the charge and said in the letter it was not to sell the house

however week later later received stating they could make us sell etc.

 

This all happened 9 years ago.

They have given so many reference numbers and mixed so much up.

 

Our son wants to buy the house and hence my question

 

can they stop the sale if they wont lift the charge which shouldn't have gone on in the first place.

 

We were told we could take this back to court if we ever wanted to sell.

 

Hope that makes sense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Need to go and find out what type of restriction the charging order is -

If its a joint house and it is against one of you then it is a very different situation than if you are both responsible for the debt.


 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest it is so confusing

There was an interim changing order and an application for a charging order also a final charging order. But one had to be taken off as they doubled the amout of the charging order. They have different reference numbers on the same case.

So I can see paperwork for all three.

Would I be able to take back to court as they are unable to provide any agreement so I don't know how the court awarded this, But it was 2009

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its a restriction K it cant be anything else as its was a debt in his name only and the property was jointly owned or mortgaged.

 

you don't have to tell them anything, only that the property has been sold.

 

go look on land registry site that will tell you

it will also answer your other thread too

 

dx


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DX100uk Thank you for your help. I read somewhere that was the case have you any idea where I could find this to back me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I know "they" cant get a charging order on a jointly owned/mortgage property unless the debt is in both names

 

Edit... Nope I'm mistaken..

Most couples own their home as joint tenants, meaning if one person dies, the property passes straight into the sole ownership of the surviving partner. A charging order changes a joint tenancy into a tenancy in common. This means the share of the property owned by the person who died will form part of their estate and won’t pass automatically to the other person.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

theres no death.

its a restriction K.

cant be anything else

 

go get a copy of the deeds from the land registry site [costs £3-4. per property search.

make SURE you ONLY use the .gov.uk site!!


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not saying there is a death.

I've copied the rules on a charging order on a jointly owned property if a debt is in one name.

 

The company holding the charging order cant stop you selling. After all, why would they? They are getting the money owed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its not a charging order its a restriction type k........

 

with a CO legally they must be given their money

with a restriction k you only have to inform them its sold..opps sorry mate you're too late...


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I fail to read in the op 1st post were it's a res k.

They have paperwork stating its a co

The title states charging order and there was a ccj followed by a charging order paperwork which was sent to the op.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they don't know yet..

yes a restriction is still called a CO, but as post 12 it cant prevent sale and doesn't need paying.

logic dictates..going by the info here ...it must be a Restriction k type.

jointly owned property, single owner CCJ...

we'll see


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting discussion on Restriction K COs here (long thread).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes remember that from years ago

nice to see you around again..RC.

 

dx


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hows this going


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...