Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Probably the case @lookinforinfo Also an update, I've got the registered keeper letter. Just to check that I continue to ignore it until PAP letter comes in?
    • Thanks very much Bank. I've now done a lot of reading and have drafted my Letter of Claim as attached. I look forward to your comments. 16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf
    • ive already CAREFULLY explained how it all works earlier. what you will have to pay is already preset and detailed on the court forms/TfL stuff you already have. you wont be asked any questions upon your financial means etc. thats not under debate . you wont be asked upon any mitigating circumstances, you have pleaded guity which you always SHOULD.  the ONLY 2 reasons you are attending is to: 1) after finding the TfL prosecutor... plead directly face to face before you go in to try and get an OOC (you can bring up or say anything/everything you like ...anything that might get them to agree) 2) if 1 fails...show your genuine remorse face to face to the magistrate, BRIEFLY mention how a criminal record would hinder your future then hope they take pity on you and dont also record this on your file.  PS its only declarable/shows there for one year anyway. regardless to what an employer might ask in job questionnaires past 1yrs you forget about it. they cannot see it even on enhanced DBS etc etc. you should not latterly ever appeal a criminal record for this type (1yrs)  of 'offence' its not worth it and if you lose said appeal it will cost your dear in terms of additional wages grabbing and court fees. and extends the time it shows if you lose too. dx  
    • hit letter of claim follow post 2 despite repeated requests, the claimant has failed to produce any enforceable paperwork.
    • FTMDave - your cold light of day suspicions are correct, alas. Just had this back... Thank you for your email. I was very sorry to learn that you recently received a parking charge notice after shopping at our Kearsley Manchester Rd Express store. I appreciate this is always frustrating, especially as you'd just nipped in for the one item. I've had a look, and I can confirm that in this case the car park at this store is entirely owned by a third party - it is not owned or operated by Tesco in any way. The parking charge issued is on behalf of that third party, although I appreciate it does state Tesco on the letter. Regrettably as the car park is owned and operated by a separate company we don't have any form of influence or control over the parking charges issued. In this case, I can only recommend that you follow the appeals process outlined on the letter directly to take the matter up with UKPPO directly. I'm sorry that I cannot offer further help in this case.  Please do not hesitate to contact me again should you require anything further.  Kind regards Ewan Kelly Customer Service Specialist On behalf of the Chief Executive’s Office
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Helping sister with Capital One PPI claim.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2293 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all.

 

I've just found this forum and have been reading through some of the very helpful guides regarding PPI.

 

I am currently in the process of helping my sister with a PPI claim against Capital One.

We've never done this sort of thing before so do have a few questions we were hoping you could help with.

 

Initially we contacted Capital One to ask if she had PPI.

They emailed back and said yes.

 

I then sent off a SAR to see what information they hold on her as we're not sure if she was mis-sold, so are trying to establish a few facts.

They responded with a pack that contained loads of statements, memos etc.

I don't think it included everything I asked for,

they said to ask again for specifics (like which telephone call exactly) and they will provide them.

 

In the statements it shows PPI,

there is also a signed copy of the CCA which indicates my sister asked for PPI.

 

She is a bit suspicious of this but that is neither here nor there,

the fact is it's signed and she has signed up to it according to this document.

 

We want to know whether it is possible she was still mis-sold though.

Ideally, we need a copy of the literature explaining what exactly PPI is and its policies that you would expect to have been sent out at the time.

This will allow us to check if she was eligible or not and perhaps claim on those grounds if she wasn't.

If she was eligible then we can at least draw a line under this and not bother complaining.

 

Is there any way of obtaining this document or information?

I understand a CCA request will just be the loan agreement which they already provided a copy of in the SAR.

I imagine they must have sent out a PPI leaflet as opposed to discussing it over the phone with her,

as the memos do not indicate any phone calls prior to the start of the PPI agreement (although they are hard to comprehend).

 

She was in part time employment at the time,

had not been in full time employment for six months prior to the agreement

which elsewhere I have read may be deemed as reasons for ineligibility and thus a mis-sale.

 

So we're not really sure how to proceed from here, if at all.

 

Thanks for reading, I appreciate any help regarding this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m not sure if this helps but I didn’t do any of that.

 

I simply completed their online form stating I believe I’d been missold as I had enough cover elsewhere and 6 weeks later I received a letter stating I was due a refund of over £3,000. The cheque took a couple of weeks after that to arrive.

Edited by Maki
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

when did she take the card out please?

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so within the period whereby online sign ups started

and within the period whereby it was known several online sign up cards had faults with their sites that had the PPI box already ticked

but I don't think that happened with the CAP1 site.

 

there are known issues with cap1 in that era too over the little white card activation sticker that was on the card

the card was already active

the sticker was to activate the PPI, but all it said was activate me and a number.

 

id p'haps go against the grain of normal cag advise and follow what maki did

just blindly put it a claim

 

there no get out being part time

nor unemployed as such

I think you are mixing that up with self employment.

now that would be a reason

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, I see. Thanks.

 

Yeah, I think she must have signed up online then got sent a paper document to sign after.

 

What I find strange is on her account page on the print outs they have sent, it says 'N' next to PPI.

 

I have read several sites claiming some policies had exclusions relating to working hours and employment status in general, that is why I was thinking of trying to get the original policy document off them. I wouldn't really know what grounds to complain on otherwise.

Edited by Hurley31
Link to post
Share on other sites

What I find strange is on her account page on the print outs they have sent, it says 'N' next to PPI

 

id mention that only for now

with a covering comment that she was well aware of the PPI issue as it had already been widely publicised that it is a bad thing at that time when the whole PPI debacle was just starting.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I understand.

 

Just to clarify,

she has physically signed a CCA with a tick next to PPI opt in and signed it.

 

I'm not sure she can really claim she didn't sign up to it,

though it does seem to be something she mindlessly went along with rather than actively sought out

(not that constitutes a mis-sale).

Link to post
Share on other sites

she ticked the box

or it was pre ticked

or she didn't and someone ticked it later?

typed tick or written.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is ticked with her signature underneath.

 

She must have ticked it as she has signed for it as well underneath where it says it requires a signature for PPI opt in.

 

It is a photocopy of a CCA so it's impossible to tell if it was pre-ticked but it makes no difference really as she has signed for it anyway so for all intents has consented to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats the PPI worth

have you done the spreadsheets?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that link, I'll do that now.

 

I assumed you just take the total and add 8% or whatever on top but obviously it is calculated differently.

 

Do you know where it says 'claim from - claim to',

 

do I put the date the card closed in the 'claim to' section?

Link to post
Share on other sites

claim to is the date they stopped their int

then take that sum and pop it in the statint sheet as a whole figure the day after they stopped int for the 8% calc

what are we looking at here...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've filled in all the charges in to the CISHEET,

 

I put the date the card closed as the claim to date as I wasn't sure if it was meant to be that or something else.

 

I also put 29.94 as the interest rate, as that is what it says on the CCA.

 

This gave me a sum of £392.64.

 

I've not done the second STATINT calculation as I'm not really sure what to do there.

Edited by Hurley31
Link to post
Share on other sites

£392.64 as one whole sum

the day after CISHEET claim to date

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I put the day after the account closed in the 'from' section and it automatically filled in today's date for the 'to' section, underneath I put in the whole sum and it gives a total of £550.72.

 

This is assuming I've done it all correctly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep so that auto updates each day.

so

and that's only a guide.

reclaim could be worth about +£500

 

and don't for get

if the PPI reclaim fails

 

you can always get them on secret commission under a plevin claim.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you have the sar with the info

and I assume a copy of the comms/account log and the agreement

on those it will tell you what her employment/status was from the info she told them.

 

what did she put down..thats the only info they will have

what does it say?

 

not what she knows as her situation then...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The agreement only shows the last page with her signature.

 

Her account page states she is in employment as a sales assistant, with an annual wage of £5000.

That's all it says.

 

I thought you said there were no exclusions regarding employment status though?

 

This is why I'm confused,

there doesn't appear to be a valid reason for a complaint if I can't mention her part time/temporary employment status.

 

This is why I asked about ways of obtaining the original PPI agreement to see what exactly the exclusions are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...