Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Recommended Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi,   I sent the email to both my local councillor and the leader of my local council yesterday evening. I didn't receive an acknowledgement email. Do you know if I should have, as I know that if you ever email an MP you always receive a acknowledgement email?   Walshy
    • Can I ask how your taking him to court with just his a trade name ?  Yes I notice hes still trading on ebay.   
    • Very good finds indeed which help to undermine their case.. And to strengthen your case take a look  look at a thread by Tom Price also at Southend airport which is several threads below yours and you will see that he won his case on the fact that he was stopped rather than parked. On top of that he had the Airports Act  1986 to quote. The relevant section is no 63 " Byelaws are covered at S.63  (2)Any such byelaws may, in particular, include byelaws— (d)for regulating vehicular traffic anywhere within the airport, except on roads within the airport to which the road traffic enactments apply, and in particular (with that exception) for imposing speed limits on vehicles within the airport and for restricting or regulating the parking of vehicles or their use for any purpose or in any manner specified in the byelaws;" That confirms that the roads at the airport are either covered by the Road Traffic Act or Byelaws neither of which is relevant land therefore  PoFA cannot apply. And  VCS should be aware of that. Another thing is that when you posted their WS you didn't include their contract which I missed at the time. However Tom Price included it in his. And guess what-the  alleged offence they are pursuing you for, No Stopping, is not included in their contract. If you look at the end of their Service Agreement [aka contract] you will a list of contravention on Scedule 1 [7] (46) PARKING/WAITING ON A ROADWAY WHERE STOPPING IS PROHIBITTED That is the nearest to what you did. But you were not parking nor waiting -you were stopped so there was no reason to issue you with a PCN as you never broke any of their contraventions. Looks like they breached your GDPR and you should include that as it carries a hefty charge £750 is not unheard of.   Have a read of his WS too which may give you further ideas even possibly to rebut some of the points VCS  make.
    • Lawrence Stroll, executive chairman of Aston Martin, told the BBC he wants to build a firm with a "luxury profile". View the full article
    • Tax rises and an extension of Covid support are both tipped to be announced in this week’s Budget. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Miss representation of Flights refund


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1163 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

back in January 2017 i booked online flights to go to Florida from London.

 

When I purchased the flights i thought that i was booking :-

 

- Direct flight from London to Florida

- Indirect flight from Florida to London via JFK.

 

When it finally came to the holiday i arrived at LHR to check in only to find that not only was my flight not direct, but, it had a 7 hour stop at Detroit!

Clearly i was very unhappy, and want a full refund of my flights.

 

Fortunately at the time of booking the flights online i took a screen shot of the booking (attached image)

you can clearly see on the image the the outbound flight appears to be direct, and the inbound flight clearly shows a stop.

 

I have raised a complaint with the travel company who refute my claim.

They say that the stop a detroit was a hidden stop for refeuling and that passengers were not supposed to disembark the plane, therefore it was a direct flight.

The airline 24hours before the actual flight the changed the schedule, thus my tough luck at 7 hours.

 

My complaint was that the outbound flight should have clearly shown the stop, thereby giving me the opportunity to not book it.

I feel that this flight was miss sold and miss represented as i would not have booked 2 indirect flights.

 

The travel company say they sent me the e ticket in july and it was my responsibility to check all was good.

I dont agree with this, as in my opinion, i would not have booked the flights in the first place.

 

I did not realise anything was wrong until check in, at which point it was too late to not go ahead.

And as i got on the plane, they state i have accepted the goods as sold.

 

Do I have a legitimate court case to claim misselling?

Document_001.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

So hang on the travel agents are saying that they sent you a e ticket in July and you should have checked they ticket was correct but they also say the change was only made 24 hours before the flight. So there own argument about the July e ticket is null and void anyway as the changes were made after.

 

Personally l would in writing and asking for a written reply ask when they sent the eticket and when the changes to the flights were made as someone has to accountable for the miscommunication

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is the passenger's resp to check accuracy of ticket info when they are received.

Flights can be modified/cancelled at any time for various reasons, but a 7hr stopover in Detroit suggests more than for refuelling,

IMO you can't claim a total refund of all tickets, but you may have an option, under EU Regs, to claim for a UK outbound flight, based on final arrival time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who you booked this with online would be helpful so we can see there T&Cs?

 

Are they registered member of other organisations on there website?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites
Who you booked this with online would be helpful so we can see there T&Cs?

 

Are they registered member of other organisations on there website?

 

 

I booked through Dream World Travel

Link to post
Share on other sites

but should they have made it clear at the time of booking that there was a hidden stop? surely that is miss representation of the flight. i would not have booked it if i knew at the time

Link to post
Share on other sites

No stop over is mentioned on the outbound ticket, just departure and arrival times.

Flying East to West across the Atlantic is flying against the jet stream, which takes more fuel and there were several Atlantic storms in 2017, so if the fuel was miscalculated, it is possible the a/c had to land & refuel en route.

Despite an unplanned 7hr delay be grateful you arrived & returned safely.

Have you tried claiming for Stat. EU flight delay compensation rather than insisting on full ticket refund for both out & inbound legs? (which you ain't going to get).

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...