Jump to content


MMF/Moriarty Law - old WDA PDL


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1237 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a letter from Moriarty saying they were acting on behalf of MMF who had *bought* a debt from WDA in 2012.

 

I told them I had made a complaint to FOS re WDA and was waiting an outcome, which I had.

 

Yesterday,

I got home to 2 letters one from WDA who said that since some of the payday loans were from 2008-2011 they could not look at the interest and charges on them but did offer a payment of in total £382 as final settlement,

 

which brings me to the 2nd letter from Moriarty who now say they have been in discussion with MMF and they are willing to take a payment of .. yep, £382 to settle the debt from 09/12.

 

They have never registered this debt on any credit files and I know they cant know as its out of the timescale.

Do you have any suggestions,

 

if I take the settlement from WDA will I have to pay it straight to Moriarty,

surely this proves they are all in cahoots as if we didn't know already.

 

Does anyone have any advice for me please.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this the same debt that's been refunded?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of it is.

The original letter from Moriarty that said they were working on behalf of MMF, and said total owing was £988 from a WDA payday loan taken out in Sept 12, which was originally £565 !!.

 

When WDA sent me a reply and also its final response over irresponsible lending,

in the letter it said,

in all I had taken out 12 loans with them,

over 3 year period,

 

as loans 1/87 were over 6 years they would not look at them,

but for loans 8/10 they have refunded £182 and £55,

 

then stated that as loan 12 (the one *bought* by MMF) was being upheld,

whatever that means,

they waived all the interest and charges so that only the principle balance of £565 was now payable.

They then stated that they will use this to redress amount to reduce the balance further ??

 

They state that now the total amount payable to me would be £382 and that I need to either accept this or go to FOS.

 

Then on the same day I got the letter from Moriarty law working n behalf of MMF,

stating that after careful consideration of all the information available to them,

they have now reduced the balance from £988 to £382 that must be paid within 30 days.

 

At no point do they mention WDA at all, but it is obviously the same loan.

 

So my question is, is this even legal ?

do I take it to the FOS or do I get the money owed to me back and then get continually chased for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they've written the loans off under IL then.

 

nothing owed to anyone as its all been refunded.

MMF can go swivel.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes and no.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you have multiple loan running already

and a crap credit file at the time?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you could reject the payment or take it a partial settlement then off to the FOS

IMHO it should be totally written off.

and MMF needs to be told so too.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had an email from John Lloyd at WDA, to ask how I knew about FOS looking at 6 year and above claims and why I had not brought it to their attention sooner.

 

Told them that online,

FOS has advised that if the loans are continuous loans, as in carried on numerous times across the 6 year period and over, with the same company, they will look into it.

 

Also told them, only knew when I looked into it after the letter from Moriarty Law.

 

Have told them I want loans 1/7 looking at again and the last loan written off.

 

If not I will take the offer they made as a partial payment and will go the FOS with the complaint.

 

As they have already acknowledged they were in the wrong with the first settlement figure offered

and the letter with it, will just have to see what they say I guess.

 

dx100uk what does the 1L mean that you mentioned above ? Thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

irresponsible lending.

good move!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...