Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Could you link us to BankFodder's post please? The judge's office means something different to me. HB
    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hair transplant covered by section 75?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2319 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Just after a bit of advice. I have heading out to Turkey next week for a hair transplant.

The operation will be in Turkey but the company gethair.co.uk has an office in London which deals with all of the admin and signing up new customers aswell as having a UK bank account.

 

The question is if I paid £100 of the balance on a UK credit card, would I be covered for any shoddy or poor service received in Istanbul. Since the company I have dealt with up until now is technically UK based?

 

Appreciate any thoughts on this :)

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

procedure is covered but you need to make sure who is providing the service,

the UK co or are they just a go-between and you pay someone else?

 

If the latter then the answer is amost certainly no as not a UK contract and then you are stuffed.

 

Is gethair licenced with the FCA as a deposit taker?

 

caveat emptor probably applies in this grey world

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Deposit taker was

 

"GLOBAL MEDICAL ASSISTANCE LTD.

 

Company number 08899061"

 

Registered office address

52, Upper Street Upper Street, Business Design Centre - Suite 111n, London, N1 0QH

Company status

Active

Company type

Private limited Company

Incorporated on

17 February 2014

 

 

not sure if they are FCA registered will try and find out :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't think why gethair uk or Global Medical would be a FCA regulated deposit taker.

 

An regulated deposit taker is a type of banking institution.

 

Nothing to do with deposits for a non-financial service or product.

 

More likely they are just acting as UK agent for the Turkish company that is providing the actual service.

 

s75 doesn't require the contract to be a UK contract.

 

This is what FOS website says:

 

The same rules for coverage under section 75 apply to credit card transactions made abroad as for credit card transactions made in the UK. But the sterling equivalent of the price must still be within the £100 to £30,000 limits.

 

Some more complex purchase contracts made abroad may specifically say that the underlying contract is governed by the law of another country. This could affect the consumer's ability to claim against the supplier (and, therefore, to claim under section 75).

Link to post
Share on other sites

procedure is covered but you need to make sure who is providing the service, the UK co or are they just a go-between and you pay someone else? If the latter then the answer is amost certainly no as not a UK contract and then you are stuffed.

it seems a go between.

their brief online terms saying; hair contract is with the 'service provider', they only 'facilitate', read the service providers terms, and exempting themselves re any negligence/malpractice re the provider etc.

it doesn't seem to say which law governs

Link to post
Share on other sites

who and how much have you paid so far.

 

gethair says their deposit is 500,

 

have you paid anything to the 'service provider', the chap on their website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they also operate a number of businesses doing the same thing, but diff names etc

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

who and how much have you paid so far.

 

gethair says their deposit is 500,

 

have you paid anything to the 'service provider', the chap on their website.

 

 

I have paid the £500 deposit which was done via a direct debit using Gocardless website , payment went to Global Medical, which is a UK registered company according to companies house, still have £2700 left to pay

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you're going to pay anything over 100, use a credit card!

do you pay all of the treatment to the uk co., who then pays the 'service provider' on your behalf

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats the issue, for some card protection if things go wrong.

you've already done 500 without a card.

i was wondering how 'involved' this global are. the more involved they are, the more they could be held to account if things go wrong with the so called 'service provider' despite their attempts to exclude liability.

hopefully though, you'll have a problem free new 'Rooney' for the money :) (though apparently he still needs further treatment for a fuller crop)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats the issue, for some card protection if things go wrong.

you've already done 500 without a card.

i was wondering how 'involved' this global are. the more involved they are, the more they could be held to account if things go wrong with the so called 'service provider' despite their attempts to exclude liability.

hopefully though, you'll have a problem free new 'Rooney' for the money :) (though apparently he still needs further treatment for a fuller crop)

 

 

haha i guess we will see ill do the £100 on credit card at the clinic and the rest as normal, atleast i can then argue if i need to undr section 75

 

yes saw rooney needs more but thats because he had it done too young and the hairs that hadnt yet fallen out will continue to do so, so he will probably continue to need transplants until his natural hair loss cycle finishes :) I have the benefit on being 40 and have shed most of whats likely to come out so fingers crossed I wont need another ! although at Turkish prices its easilly affordable :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

this points to me as you are paying a third party and so are NOT covered by s75 as they are not providing the goods or service. It is like paying paypal for goods bought from another party, Paypal have no liability and you cant use s75 as you havent paid the supplier directly.

 

I have paid the £500 deposit which was done via a direct debit using Gocardless website , payment went to Global Medical, which is a UK registered company according to companies house, still have £2700 left to pay
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...