Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the 5.1 is better for that solo from jeff   if you go that way again get pictures of all the signs inc the small print where they are  and the machine ones. and the view from the public road 
    • Hi dx100uk,    OK will do, I'll wait for that possible stage to come and keep this updated when I can.   I didn't buy a parking ticket.   Kal   ...       Way off topic but I love your profile pic, gonna listen now and allow Jeff Beck to send shivers down my spine in his epic WGW P3 solo ✌️    
    • Apologies, misunderstanding on my part. I was thinking of a shop called Cotswold. Please ignore me.   HB
    • 1st Draft - reviewed several statements    I was a bit unsure about adding more about the section 78, although they took a very long time the did provide the CCA - any help appreciated    In The *******County Court Claim No. ********* Between **********Claimant and *************** Defendant     I am the defendant in this case and make this Witness statement in support of my defence in this claim. The matters set out below are within my own knowledge, except where I indicate to the contrary.   1. It is my understanding that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct disputed or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed ...10p to 15p in the £1 and which the original creditors have already written off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income. Idem Capital securities issue claims to circumvent and claim the full amount of debt to maximise profit.    2. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchase’s debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.   3. It is accepted that I have in the past had financial dealings with HBOS. That being a Credit card Agreement.   4. After seeking advice this led me to check all paperwork I held with creditors, from this I could not find any Credit Agreement relating to the account the claimant is referring to.   6. I therefore sought clarification and requested copies of the agreements from the claimant by way of a section 78 request for the alleged amount.    7. A Letter before claim pursuant to Pre Action Protocol was issued by the claimant 06/09/2019. I made a request for the following documents:   ·         A copy of the Default Notice ·         A copy of the Notice of assignment ·         A complete set of statements detailing exactly how the debt has accrued detailing ·         All transactions ·        Any additional charges applied since the account was terminated ·         A statement  of all payments received.   The claimant to date has failed to comply completely with my request and has not provided me with the required Default Notice.      8 .On the 13/11/19 the claimant issued a claim form through the county court business centre. On receipt of the claim form I made a CPR 31.14 request.    9. A CPR 31.14 request was sent 25/11/2019 via Royal Mail signed for and shows as received 27/11/19. A Request for the following documents was made:   ·            Default Notice ·            Full statement of account     The claimant to date has failed to comply and disclose the default notice.   Conclusion   To date no Default Notice has been produced.    The claimant has still yet to comply with my CPR 31.14 request with regard to clarity of any valid default notice issued, as yet I have never received an original or seen a copy of a valid default notice from the claimant.   Arbitration confirmed that the claimant could not produce the Default notice document    Therefore for the above reasons the claim bought by the claimant is without merit and an abuse of the court process. It would be far more gracious and forthright for the claimant to admit that they do not have possession of the correct valid paperwork and this is an attempt to convince the court that the claimant can disclose the legal valid documents on which its claim relies on.   Until such time the claimant can comply and disclose a Default Notice they are not entitled while the default continues, to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 87 (1) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974.    I **********, the defendant, believe that the facts stated in the witness statement are true.     Signed…………………………. Dated……………………………
    • time for an sar first make sure you read all the posts in the sar link too.   dx  
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
decade

Accident, illegal overtake but no witness

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 910 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I had this

- cars were following some big truck at about 40mph in 60 zone and then just ahead is the first possibility to overtake straight into 70 zone.

 

everyone is taking right lane.

I usually have a solid distance to preceding car and

 

when I was doing it

- just along the white line

- guy behind used painted area to try to get in front of me and we brushed sides.

 

He has damage to back side of his car around back wheel arch,

I have damage to side at front between door and front lights.

 

INsurance advisor was only suggesting that as I was changing lanes I could be at found fault too.

 

I'm kind of not ready to take hit on that

[costs - car is important to get me to work far away],

but there is no witness,

and guy can claim he has overtook but never went over painted area.

 

The Only thing supporting my case is that there is junction in 200m and we have still managed to get it and stop round a corner

- crawling slowly for most of the distance after accident.

 

Road is busy and too dangerous to walk onto plus it was dark to get any evidence photographed. Only debris from side indicator could poss be found.

 

1. I'm not feeling at fault should I go already with letters in STICKY [more like messages as only phone number ready]

 

1a. When to send letter if only in few weeks I will know full extent of uninsured costs?

 

2. If I neglect that can he do the same?

claiming I was at fault and what is worst case scenario?

 

It is right thing to claim expenses,

but now I just feel 'how I did not see it coming in a side mirror'

but remember only it went fast and he had to well accelerate to be in front of me that fast :

Selection_001.png

Edited by honeybee13
Font colour changed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If fault is not clear, it will just be a 50/50. Insurers are not going to become involved in any argument to apportion % of fault. It will just be seen as a 50/50, both at fault.

 

Don't send any letters. Both Insured drivers just provide all information they have to their own Insurers and follow the claims process. You pay an Insurance premium for your Insurers to deal with sorting out your claim.

 

If this accident was clearly the fault of one driver e.g the other driver slammed into the rear of your car, because they failed to brake as they were not paying attention, then that would be a different matter.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As unclebulgaria said, it will probably be settled at 50/50.

I suggest you invest in a dashcam.

Even a very cheap one would have proved your point in this case.

There are so many bad drivers out there that make me think they're giving out driving licence s in sweet shops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

I've changed the font colour of the OP to make it easier to read.

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not illegal to overtake on chevrons but you must ensure road is clear as they are there to protect junctions etc.

 

Likely that 50/50 is the best you can hope for

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i always thought you couldn't go on them (unless you are avoiding a collision or going around a stationary vehicle).

You learn something new everyday

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not illegal to overtake or enter a "boxed" chevron area if the white line bordering the chevrons is broken and it is necessary and safe to do so .

 

If the area is bordered by a solid line, it is illegal to enter the chevron area.

(Highway code - rule 130).

Edited by Nimrod205
syntax

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The chevron area in the op's picture has got a solid line, so it shouldn't be driven over.

 

Doesn't really matter in this case because there are no witnesses and no footage, so it will probably go 50/50.

Shameful!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Other driver shouldn't of been in chevrons, you shouldn't of pulled out.

50/50

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sad and true - but I have decided to complete the paperwork for insurance company and draw situation on the road, in case something goes awkward, to then support my case.

 

But I have a question.

 

In this situation - DO I CHANGE LANE?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no neither of you should have attempted the early overtake.

the line was solid

 

are you SURE that the lines are as your pic?

 

 

dx


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What you did is in the past and can't be changed.

The hard fact is that without witnesses and footage, unless the other driver admits fault, the claim will go 50/50.

Get a dashcam.

With all the idiots on the road playing with their mobile phone, it's now an essential motorist tool to limit insurance premium going up out of the known universe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's found that you changed your road positioning when a vehicle was overtaking and you made contact, then I'd imagine the insurance companies will find against you, especially when you state the collision occurred to the side of your vehicle, meaning a quick glance in your mirror would've been sufficient to have seen passing traffic, I'd imagine this puts you at fault.

 

The best outcome by the sounds of it is that it goes 50/50, however, I'd imagine they'll go for full liability against you unfortunately.

 

You shouldn't be overtaking without checking your mirrors and quickly glancing over your shoulder to check it's clear, then signal, then start the overtake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have actually asked completely different question.

I wanted to know when one gets to this Y shaped split into 2 lanes without broken line in the middle, is it changing lanes [opposite to merging traffic] and where is he write up about it in highway code?

 

 

You shouldn't be overtaking without checking your mirrors

 

 

no neither of you should have attempted the early overtake.

the line was solid

 

are you SURE that the lines are as your pic?

 

 

dx

 

You lost me here. I was the green car being overtaken over painted chevrons.

 

And it's not like in the picture this is where it happened.

 

Today driving there with dashcam already @king1234 :sad: I got recorded another car doing exactly same manoeuvre like the guy that hit me [yes this is how I see it]

 

Should I report it? In Germany they would...

 

 

Areas of white diagonal stripes or chevrons painted on the road. These are to separate traffic lanes or to protect traffic turning right.

  • If the area is bordered by a broken white line, you should not enter the area unless it is necessary and you can see that it is safe to do so.
  • If the area is marked with chevrons and bordered by solid white lines you MUST NOT enter it except in an emergency.

 

http://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/lines-and-lane-markings-on-the-road.html

 

mch1991, u should think again about road situation where someone approaches you at (over)speed from behind and needs about 0.1 s to be from your tail to your side, you could be next checking your mirrors and relaxing before hitting someone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should you report the driver you recorded today?

If you have time to waste, by all means.

I once tried to report a van driver who did something very dangerous and scared the hell out of me.

The police said that a cd with the footage wasn't sufficient and they wanted the original sd card unedited.

They would have kept it in evidence.

My guess was that they would have looked through the whole sd card to find a fault in my driving so to screw me over, so i declined their offer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I just start making YT videos, having your story in mind

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, minor transgressions with the law aren't always considered "negligent", for example, there's case law that supports the view that whilst speeding is against the law, it's not always negligent to exceed the speed limit.

 

It's your word against theirs, insurance companies will decide on the facts available, one huge factor is that a vehicle hit the side of your car when you started your overtake, this indicates to most people that you started your maneuver and ended up colliding with the other vehicle which was well established in their maneuver, on a legal position of the road at the time it happened.

 

Looking at the diagram and what you've said, anything less than full liability is a good result, you're negligent because you've had a collision with passing traffic that's hit the rear side of your car whilst overtaking, regardless of where the vehicle started the overtake, you'll struggle to prove the fact that the other party did something contrary to the law, whereas the provable evidence is that you have damage to the side of your vehicle, as does the other party, indicating a side impact with a car that was overtaking in a legal position at the time of contact.

 

Ever since my first collision earlier this year (non fault, overtaking a car on a straight country road, car didn't see me and pulled out from a small muddy track road into my path, fortunately minor damage), it's changed my manner of driving, defensive driving is best practice nowadays with the morons we share the road with, that and a dashboard camera that can prove my innocence should I need it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My motorbike days taught me a very good lesson, to predict what other motorists are going to do wrong.

Saved accidents on many occasions and many times i found myself saying"look at this" to a car and a few seconds later it made some stupid manoeuvre.

Can i predict the immediate future?

I wish!

I think it's just survival instinct kicking in from when i was on two wheels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There only is so much you can predict, 15 years and 1st ever accident rather seems to confirm that, also it's the first year I have decided to protect my NCD, lucky me.

 

That's why I don't like too much what happened.

 

Still - does anyone know is green car changing a lane and any link to Highway code about it. I can't find anyting.

 

 

Selection_001.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There only is so much you can predict, 15 years and 1st ever accident rather seems to confirm that, also it's the first year I have decided to protect my NCD, lucky me.

 

That's why I don't like too much what happened.

 

Still - does anyone know is green car changing a lane and any link to Highway code about it. I can't find anyting.

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]70147[/ATTACH]

 

 

Rule 133 and 137.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rule 133 and 137.

 

133

If you need to change lane, first use your mirrors and if necessary take a quick sideways glance to make sure you will not force another road user to change course or speed. When it is safe to do so, signal to indicate your intentions to other road users and when clear, move over.

 

137

On a two-lane dual carriageway you should stay in the left-hand lane. Use the right-hand lane for overtaking or turning right. After overtaking, move back to the left-hand lane when it is safe to do so.

 

 

Technically it's still single carriageway.

 

I could throw reversal situation here. When dual goes into single (merging) and middle broken line finishes, way before, car in front is privileged although looking from your point of view it's changing lane.

 

That's why I'm asking specifically in this situation, to habe a clear understanding, whenever this situation occur (as it doesn't apply to my initial problem).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
133

If you need to change lane, first use your mirrors and if necessary take a quick sideways glance to make sure you will not force another road user to change course or speed. When it is safe to do so, signal to indicate your intentions to other road users and when clear, move over.

 

137

On a two-lane dual carriageway you should stay in the left-hand lane. Use the right-hand lane for overtaking or turning right. After overtaking, move back to the left-hand lane when it is safe to do so.

 

 

Technically it's still single carriageway.

 

I could throw reversal situation here. When dual goes into single (merging) and middle broken line finishes, way before, car in front is privileged although looking from your point of view it's changing lane.

 

That's why I'm asking specifically in this situation, to habe a clear understanding, whenever this situation occur (as it doesn't apply to my initial problem).

 

“Technically it’s a single carriageway”

Rubbish. It’s dual. With a solid chevron.

 

You’ve been given the answers, the rules. You should NOT have changed lane. End of story.

 

How’s that claim going?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...