Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Accident, illegal overtake but no witness


decade
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2296 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had this

- cars were following some big truck at about 40mph in 60 zone and then just ahead is the first possibility to overtake straight into 70 zone.

 

everyone is taking right lane.

I usually have a solid distance to preceding car and

 

when I was doing it

- just along the white line

- guy behind used painted area to try to get in front of me and we brushed sides.

 

He has damage to back side of his car around back wheel arch,

I have damage to side at front between door and front lights.

 

INsurance advisor was only suggesting that as I was changing lanes I could be at found fault too.

 

I'm kind of not ready to take hit on that

[costs - car is important to get me to work far away],

but there is no witness,

and guy can claim he has overtook but never went over painted area.

 

The Only thing supporting my case is that there is junction in 200m and we have still managed to get it and stop round a corner

- crawling slowly for most of the distance after accident.

 

Road is busy and too dangerous to walk onto plus it was dark to get any evidence photographed. Only debris from side indicator could poss be found.

 

1. I'm not feeling at fault should I go already with letters in STICKY [more like messages as only phone number ready]

 

1a. When to send letter if only in few weeks I will know full extent of uninsured costs?

 

2. If I neglect that can he do the same?

claiming I was at fault and what is worst case scenario?

 

It is right thing to claim expenses,

but now I just feel 'how I did not see it coming in a side mirror'

but remember only it went fast and he had to well accelerate to be in front of me that fast :

Selection_001.png

Edited by honeybee13
Font colour changed.
Link to post
Share on other sites

If fault is not clear, it will just be a 50/50. Insurers are not going to become involved in any argument to apportion % of fault. It will just be seen as a 50/50, both at fault.

 

Don't send any letters. Both Insured drivers just provide all information they have to their own Insurers and follow the claims process. You pay an Insurance premium for your Insurers to deal with sorting out your claim.

 

If this accident was clearly the fault of one driver e.g the other driver slammed into the rear of your car, because they failed to brake as they were not paying attention, then that would be a different matter.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As unclebulgaria said, it will probably be settled at 50/50.

I suggest you invest in a dashcam.

Even a very cheap one would have proved your point in this case.

There are so many bad drivers out there that make me think they're giving out driving licence s in sweet shops.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not illegal to overtake or enter a "boxed" chevron area if the white line bordering the chevrons is broken and it is necessary and safe to do so .

 

If the area is bordered by a solid line, it is illegal to enter the chevron area.

(Highway code - rule 130).

Edited by Nimrod205
syntax
Link to post
Share on other sites

sad and true - but I have decided to complete the paperwork for insurance company and draw situation on the road, in case something goes awkward, to then support my case.

 

But I have a question.

 

In this situation - DO I CHANGE LANE?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no neither of you should have attempted the early overtake.

the line was solid

 

are you SURE that the lines are as your pic?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you did is in the past and can't be changed.

The hard fact is that without witnesses and footage, unless the other driver admits fault, the claim will go 50/50.

Get a dashcam.

With all the idiots on the road playing with their mobile phone, it's now an essential motorist tool to limit insurance premium going up out of the known universe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's found that you changed your road positioning when a vehicle was overtaking and you made contact, then I'd imagine the insurance companies will find against you, especially when you state the collision occurred to the side of your vehicle, meaning a quick glance in your mirror would've been sufficient to have seen passing traffic, I'd imagine this puts you at fault.

 

The best outcome by the sounds of it is that it goes 50/50, however, I'd imagine they'll go for full liability against you unfortunately.

 

You shouldn't be overtaking without checking your mirrors and quickly glancing over your shoulder to check it's clear, then signal, then start the overtake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have actually asked completely different question.

I wanted to know when one gets to this Y shaped split into 2 lanes without broken line in the middle, is it changing lanes [opposite to merging traffic] and where is he write up about it in highway code?

 

 

You shouldn't be overtaking without checking your mirrors

 

 

no neither of you should have attempted the early overtake.

the line was solid

 

are you SURE that the lines are as your pic?

 

 

dx

 

You lost me here. I was the green car being overtaken over painted chevrons.

 

And it's not like in the picture this is where it happened.

 

Today driving there with dashcam already @king1234 :sad: I got recorded another car doing exactly same manoeuvre like the guy that hit me [yes this is how I see it]

 

Should I report it? In Germany they would...

 

 

Areas of white diagonal stripes or chevrons painted on the road. These are to separate traffic lanes or to protect traffic turning right.

  • If the area is bordered by a broken white line, you should not enter the area unless it is necessary and you can see that it is safe to do so.
  • If the area is marked with chevrons and bordered by solid white lines you MUST NOT enter it except in an emergency.

 

http://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/lines-and-lane-markings-on-the-road.html

 

mch1991, u should think again about road situation where someone approaches you at (over)speed from behind and needs about 0.1 s to be from your tail to your side, you could be next checking your mirrors and relaxing before hitting someone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should you report the driver you recorded today?

If you have time to waste, by all means.

I once tried to report a van driver who did something very dangerous and scared the hell out of me.

The police said that a cd with the footage wasn't sufficient and they wanted the original sd card unedited.

They would have kept it in evidence.

My guess was that they would have looked through the whole sd card to find a fault in my driving so to screw me over, so i declined their offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, minor transgressions with the law aren't always considered "negligent", for example, there's case law that supports the view that whilst speeding is against the law, it's not always negligent to exceed the speed limit.

 

It's your word against theirs, insurance companies will decide on the facts available, one huge factor is that a vehicle hit the side of your car when you started your overtake, this indicates to most people that you started your maneuver and ended up colliding with the other vehicle which was well established in their maneuver, on a legal position of the road at the time it happened.

 

Looking at the diagram and what you've said, anything less than full liability is a good result, you're negligent because you've had a collision with passing traffic that's hit the rear side of your car whilst overtaking, regardless of where the vehicle started the overtake, you'll struggle to prove the fact that the other party did something contrary to the law, whereas the provable evidence is that you have damage to the side of your vehicle, as does the other party, indicating a side impact with a car that was overtaking in a legal position at the time of contact.

 

Ever since my first collision earlier this year (non fault, overtaking a car on a straight country road, car didn't see me and pulled out from a small muddy track road into my path, fortunately minor damage), it's changed my manner of driving, defensive driving is best practice nowadays with the morons we share the road with, that and a dashboard camera that can prove my innocence should I need it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My motorbike days taught me a very good lesson, to predict what other motorists are going to do wrong.

Saved accidents on many occasions and many times i found myself saying"look at this" to a car and a few seconds later it made some stupid manoeuvre.

Can i predict the immediate future?

I wish!

I think it's just survival instinct kicking in from when i was on two wheels.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There only is so much you can predict, 15 years and 1st ever accident rather seems to confirm that, also it's the first year I have decided to protect my NCD, lucky me.

 

That's why I don't like too much what happened.

 

Still - does anyone know is green car changing a lane and any link to Highway code about it. I can't find anyting.

 

 

Selection_001.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

There only is so much you can predict, 15 years and 1st ever accident rather seems to confirm that, also it's the first year I have decided to protect my NCD, lucky me.

 

That's why I don't like too much what happened.

 

Still - does anyone know is green car changing a lane and any link to Highway code about it. I can't find anyting.

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]70147[/ATTACH]

 

 

Rule 133 and 137.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Rule 133 and 137.

 

133

If you need to change lane, first use your mirrors and if necessary take a quick sideways glance to make sure you will not force another road user to change course or speed. When it is safe to do so, signal to indicate your intentions to other road users and when clear, move over.

 

137

On a two-lane dual carriageway you should stay in the left-hand lane. Use the right-hand lane for overtaking or turning right. After overtaking, move back to the left-hand lane when it is safe to do so.

 

 

Technically it's still single carriageway.

 

I could throw reversal situation here. When dual goes into single (merging) and middle broken line finishes, way before, car in front is privileged although looking from your point of view it's changing lane.

 

That's why I'm asking specifically in this situation, to habe a clear understanding, whenever this situation occur (as it doesn't apply to my initial problem).

Link to post
Share on other sites

133

If you need to change lane, first use your mirrors and if necessary take a quick sideways glance to make sure you will not force another road user to change course or speed. When it is safe to do so, signal to indicate your intentions to other road users and when clear, move over.

 

137

On a two-lane dual carriageway you should stay in the left-hand lane. Use the right-hand lane for overtaking or turning right. After overtaking, move back to the left-hand lane when it is safe to do so.

 

 

Technically it's still single carriageway.

 

I could throw reversal situation here. When dual goes into single (merging) and middle broken line finishes, way before, car in front is privileged although looking from your point of view it's changing lane.

 

That's why I'm asking specifically in this situation, to habe a clear understanding, whenever this situation occur (as it doesn't apply to my initial problem).

 

“Technically it’s a single carriageway”

Rubbish. It’s dual. With a solid chevron.

 

You’ve been given the answers, the rules. You should NOT have changed lane. End of story.

 

How’s that claim going?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...