Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've just taken another look through the stuff they sent me in response to the CPR request, the notice of assignment isn't the original , it's on a plain sheet of non letterhead paper, in fact it could have easily been typed up by Overdales, or anybody really.  On the other side of the paper are standard Lowell terms and conditions that are only half on the page. Should this be part of my defence?
    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VCS ANPR PCN Claimform - overstay St Marys Gate, retail park, Sheffield **WON+COSTS**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1875 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

now go back and read post 16

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Justice143. The thing you MUST remember is that they've already failed.

 

They had 14 days from the day after the parking event to write to you with that NtK. That's not just a wish & a pipe dream, it's the law. POFA 2012. Schedule 4. Section 9. Paragraph 4(b)..

 

That means that the Ntk MUST have landed on your doormat on or before 7th November 2017.

 

Their NtK wasn't even printed until 29th November, so unless they had a DeLorean and some Plutonium handy, there's absolutely no way that it could have got to you before 7th Nov!

 

That means, as long as you don't tell them who was driving the vehicle, I've got more chance of building a house on the Sun than they have of ever winning a court case against you :lol:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Thank you @dragonfly1967 and @Dx100uk.

 

Just to keep you posted.

I have now had two further threats from DRP saying they have advised their client to take court action.

 

Lets see what happens next.

 

Hopefully nothing.

 

I have no experience with court x

 

Do you need to see these letter? x

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

doesn't say will anything read it properly

DRP cant recommend a washing powder let alone court action

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hello guys,

I'm back.

After various scaremongering letters from various different companies representing VCS. (Including one which lowers the price I had to pay) All ignored.

I have now received a claim form which appears to be from court and is dated 31st August 2018.

The address on the form is Money claims online, county courts bulk centre St Catherines street, NN1 2LH.

There is also a N9A and N9B form in the pack

Is this the time to hit them with the fact they sent out the NTK letter out late?

Please can you advise me what to do now? x

PS They refer to me as MR in this letter and I am a Miss!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've taken down your upload you left the password in and the claim number you'll need

don't bother popping them back up

we know what an N1 looks like

please complete this:

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?465231-Received-a-Court-Claim-From-A-Private-parking-Speculative-invoice-How-To-Deal-With-It-HERE***Updated-Aug-2016***

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I MUST NOT MISS FILING YOUR DEFENCE BY 17th Sept

 

In order for us to help you we require the following information:-

 

Name of the Claimant Vehicle Control Services, 2 Europa Court, Sheffield Business Park, Sheffield, S9 1XE

claimants Solicitors: Doesn't say.

 

Date of issue – 29th August 2018

 

Date to acknowledge - 16th September

 

 

date to submit defence - 28th Sept

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.The claimant issue is for the sum of 160 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant in respect of a charge notice (CN) for a contravention on 24/10/2017 at St Marys Gate retail park Sheffield. The CN relates to a (make and model of vehicle and registration)

2.The terms of the CN allowed the defendant 28days from the issue date to pay the CN, but the defendant failed to do so.

Despite demand having been made the defendant has failed to settle their outstanding liability.

 

3.The claimant seeks the recovery of the CN and interest under the section 69 of the County Courts act 1984 at the rate of 8% at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment.

 

What is the value of the claim? £185.00

 

The claim has been issued by the Private parking Company

 

Thank you x

Edited by dx100uk
format
Link to post
Share on other sites

please note corrected dates

not sure where you are getting 17th sept from??

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the claimant

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim)

.

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They did on the 29th May.

This is it.

Sorry that I am only replying each day.

Juggling small children and my brother has just been knocked of his push bike and has gone in rehab for brain surgery so this claim coming throughs timing is spot on. The barstewards.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get that CPR running and get [AOS} done

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zenith are no-one, that isnt a PAP letter so something to use against them. If nothing else it reduces the bill by 25% for not following procedure and will alert the judge to any other mistake they make ( there will be plenty as they like to add ficticious amounts to the £100 charge for no lawful reason hence the £160 claim.. So, even if they win they will only get £75 from a defended claim and it will cost them £85 already. Not a great business model hance the porkies about costs etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I have been online and acknowledged the claim and I am am now editing the 31:14 template. Thank you.

 

I'm sorry but I am not the sharpist tool in the draw and I am unsure which paragraphs to leave and which ones to keep.

 

Please help.

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

[template removed - dx please read its top line]

Link to post
Share on other sites

[template removed - dx please read its top line]

 

just send as it is no need to edit

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thank you.

Ive been trying to fathom what you mean by read the top line and now I realise there are two links in one…

Perhaps by read the top line you meant the date change. That was noted thank you for spending the time to work it out.

...Just to confirm then the letter I am sending is the one that I come to when I click on the link above beginning

https: and not the CPR31:14 option in the library that I come to if I click on the bold underlined writing CPR31:14?

Thanks in advance.

eric - Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blue link in post 33 not cpr 31:14 black one

Justice143 said:
Perhaps by read the top line you meant the date change. That was noted thank you for spending the time to work it out.

No its top line

Please dont publish our templates in the public forums......

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not due till day 33

 

prob std 2 line defence in most PPC claimform threads here

but DO NOT file early

 

in terms of the court only [AOS] to date must be done

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Standard

 

You. Need to read around

Use the time wisely

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks again so far guys. I have been reading around the forum and sticky threads on the hunt for the standard two line defence mentioned above. Particularly the fact they were timed out on keeper liability.

 

This link that you have provided http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/9/schedule/4d says "Page not found"

 

-I am also of the understanding that I should contact the council to check planning permission for signage

-Check with the DVLA to see who and when got my details and make notes of the dates

Any thing else? I am quite stressed of the prospect of having to defend myself professionally and accurately in court/interview room

 

I was watching a show and parked in the car park i believed to belonged to the theatre. It was dark i looked for pay machines but didn't notice the signs. Do I need to mention this or is the fact they timed out enough? and where can I find the standard defence sentence for this please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

use the search cag box of the top red toolbar

 

vcs claimform

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just google POFA 2012 and the first hit will be the govt legislation published Act

Read Paras 4,5 8 and 9 carefully.

 

 

A for I was at a theater and I thought the car park was theirs will lose you the case. The whole point of your defence is that they have to PROVE you were driving, tell them this and you ahve given away the biggest advantage you ahve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok after reading through the POFA and many many threads I actually think I feel worse about this situation.

I really feel like I will crumble attending a court and gathering and presenting the evidence in a witness statement.

Especially since reading this thread

Re: VCS PCN Caimform - Car park: Berkeley Centre, Ecclesall RD, Sheffield, S11 8PN, where the defended has been sent a 48 page document off the claimant since filing his defence!

 

I really did not realise this could turn into something so time-consuming and I half wish I had paid it.

That said I am most grateful for the time you guys have put in.

I think I have found the single line defence you speak of post #17 of this thread.

I really hope they realise they are wrong and drop it otherwise I risk being a stuttering idiot in court.

 

Is this sufficient?

 

1. The claimant cannot rely upon the POFA 2012 to create a keeper liability and the defendant denies being the driver at the time.

this means there is no cause for action by the claimant against the defendant.

 

 

Do I also need this?

 

2. In any case there was no breach of contract as no applicable contractual condition was offered to the driver at the time.

 

3. The signage at the site entrance is not a contract but an invitation to treat so the claimant cannot rely upon it to create terms by which the driver would be bound.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...