Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Peter McCormack says "ambition is big" and Real Bedford's attendances are increasing with promotions.View the full article
    • How does one obtain the permit? The permit team number is only open between the hours of 9am to 3pm Mon - Fri. It says on the website, To obtain an additional 2 hours, the driver must pay a tariff of £3.00 + booking fees in person at our Security Hut, is that how you get the permit also, from the security hut? What a rigmaroll that would be but maybe just another step to take to try and catch people out?
    • Anotheruser0000 bear in mind that not all Judges are equally versed in the PoFA regulations. Fortunately now most of them are but sometimes a Judge from a higher Court sits in who is well experienced  in Law but not PoFA. and so they sometimes go "offkey" because their knowledge can raise a different set of arguments and solutions. It does seem particularly unfair  when the decision is so  bad . it can also be that in some situations the motorist being a lay person is not sufficiently know ledgeable to be able to counter a Judge's decisions in a way that a barrister could.
    • The argument about the date of receipt is now dead because the PCN  does not comply with the wording  of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  First reason Section 9 [2] [e]  "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper—(i)to pay the unpaid parking charges;" Second Reason Section 9 [2][a] "specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;" All your PCN does is mark the time you entered and left the car park. It does not include all the myriad things you do in between-driving into the car park, looking for a parking space-perhaps a disabled space or  parent and Child place@ getting the children or disabled person out of the car then going shopping. Coming back; loading the car with shopping [, getting the children or disabled into the car, taking the trolley back to the store; driving to the exit perhaps stopping to let vehicles/pedestrians cross in front of you etc. so subtracting the driving times from before and after parking can make quite a difference from their time to the actual period parking time. So the upshot is now that only the driver is responsible for paying the PCN and the keeper is not liable at all even if the name of the driver is never known by Nexus so well done for not appealing. You obviously want to keep it that way to make it very difficult for them to win in Court if it ever goes that far. Although your question is now moot since  the same objective has been achieved by the non compliant PCN [ie no keeper liability] just  about the only way to dispute the timing of the PCN would be if one kept the envelope and there was a discernible date stamp on it that did not match the date on the PCN. There is a new Act coming out [and it cannot come quickly enough ] and one of the things required is that parking companies will have to prove the date of sending out their PCNs. We are not the only ones who sometimes doubt the veracity of their dates particularly as the later it is sent [unlawfully] the shorter the period motorists have to benefit [?] from the reduced payment. I haven't seen it on your posts but do you know how long you are permitted to park for free?
    • I was so annoyed and frustrated about the fact this case was lost it's been floating around my head all night. Dave962, are you sure that's what the Judge said? .... It doesn't make sense. Did the judge in fact dismiss the case on the grounds that the defendant did not make an appeal within 28 days? Effectively telling the PPC about the error entering the registration number and providing proof of payment at that time? To me, that's an important point.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Chess Ltd and True Telecom


blueda
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2071 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks ericsbrother and dx,

 

I am a sole trader with a business name and i am still trading,

 

Could i be in a position to offer a settlement to Chess when they deliver the early termination fee ?.

 

When Chess i hear from Chess i will ask what type of account i have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

see what they bill you for and challenge the details.

 

As already said,

line rental goes to BT and you are paying that via talktalk so should be knocked off the bill.

 

There may be extras that canot be provided, it is about "performance" ie could they deliver thier side of the bargain?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasnt saying you shopuld pay it unchallenged,

just expect to pay what you owe and that wont include line rental because you are paying for that via talktalk and the line belongs to BT, not Chess.

 

I also said you should look at their charges and make sure you are only paying for services received or applicable.

 

You dont have to pay them to feed the unicorns

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will contact Chess regarding the extra services on the account that i dont have and did not request, over months it adds up, thanks ericsbrother.

 

As i posted before in the November invoice in my email,

Chess have charges for Care level,

Fraud monitor,

Line assurance,

Voicemail,

 

I never agreed for any of these services and found out in the recent email.

 

I will call Chess when they are back at work next week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so,

did you sign up for these (awkward to show you didnt if you accepted a package)

but the main thing is you can knock off the BT line rental from their bill as a matter of course

because you are paying that via talktalk so no need to pay it twice.

 

My starting point on the other extras is to not pay that part of the bill and let them prove you specifically agreed to them.

 

As the agreement will have been with True they wont be able to access the recording of the contract call anyway

so only have the say so of a now defunct company at the time of transfer against your word you didnt agree.

 

I cant see them wanting to take that to court even if you agreed a package

Link to post
Share on other sites

then do your sums and offer to pay that amount when they next contact you. so work out what they are charging you over the contract period for line rental and the extras, remove them from the bill and offer to pay the balance. It wont be much compared to the loaded bill they have already sent..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ericsbrother,

Chess have indicated that they will be billing me well over £400 for early termination fee,

 

By what you have said i can calculate the cost of the remaining contract time line rental and deduct it from the bill

and also the cost of past and future care level, fraud monitor, Line assurance, voicemail,

which maybe goes back to the start of contract with True Telecom.

Link to post
Share on other sites

a cancellation fee should be well less than any outstanding balance if it is one.

it should not be the full outstanding terms of the contract + any fictional fees.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx

 

I have found in my exercise book that i used to write in when called by True telecom and their caller name,

 

i was encouraged to leave BT for them as follows

BT line rental £18.99 True telecom £9.03

Broadband £25 £17.99

Call package £20 £9.99

Total £63.99 Total£37.01

 

A saving of £27.00 per month for moving from BT to True telecom which is the reason that i moved,

yet a short time after i moved i was being charged much the same as BT were

and Chess were doing the same when they took over from True Telecom.

 

The November bill from Chess which they have sent me by email due to me cancelling direct debit is for £58.22 and details are

Broadband £17.90

Care level £2.00

Fraud monitor £1.99

Line rental £13.54

Line assurance £1.99

Voicemail £2.75

 

I agreed to the terms on previous post only and when i received the email that was the first i saw these other charges, The rest shows some phone calls each amounting to pennys.

 

It looks like Chess and or True Telecom have some questions to answer.

All comments welcome folks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, you work out what you AGRRED and pay them what they are due under that agreement when they ask.

 

Also when they do ask

you demand copies of previous bills as you believe they are incorrect and wont be paying until you have seen them (unless you have them somewhere else).

 

Chess took over the account so they owe you any monies that true have diddled out of you,

that is part of their risk when taking on someone elses accounts this way

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ericsbrother,

it turns out that the amount that i agreed to pay True Telecom is £36.95 per month,

I do not have any copies of bills other than the latest one online,

 

All other payments were collected by direct debit monthly preceded by an email of the amount to be collected without a cost breakdown other than call charges which are never high due to us using mobiles.

 

When chess ask i will do as you advise and demand all bill details going back to start of contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£36.95 a month?

God, they saw you coming.

 

Still, that is what you agreed so what do you get for your money?

Was that including mobiles and if so then Chess cant bill you a penny more.

 

That could be enough for it to be considered the contract was broken at that point but not a certainty as it may be not serious enough to repudiate the entire contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it does look like they saw me coming,

yet i remember being led to believe i was getting a better deal than £36.95 before agreeing to the deal and

 

i was dissapointed when i was first billed,

so they included hidden charges at the start and added more on some time later.

 

The deal was for landline and Broadband only, No mobile phones.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received an email bill from Chess yesterday titled Your latest Chess bill is ready with refund on broadband package, care level, line analogue, voicemail.

 

The early termination fee is £472.

 

The original invoice appears to be £443 with the total due £439.

 

It is rather baffling looking to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

post it up?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know how to post up from my laptop, and until someone assists me here is the content of first attachment.

Chess True

Thank you for choosing Chess.

Your total bill this month is £439.56

Net subject to VAT 25% VAT £27.60

Net subject to 0% VAT £472.68

VAT @ 20% £5.52

Please ensure payment is made by 31 January to avoid late payment charges or restrictions of services.

Administration £472.68 - £27.60 VAT - £5.52 Total £439.56

Refund of Broadband package unlimited 36 months 7/12/17 to 31/12/17 refund offer £17.9900 Total - £14.5081

Refund of care level -£20000 -£1.6129

Refund of Line analogue -£13.5400 -£10.9194

Refund of voicemail -£2.7500 -£2.2178

Early termination fee £472.6800

Total £443.4218

docs1.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

so, where are your figures to counter this?

I would be calculating a bill for all of the added extras,

the line rental that goes to BT etc as already said ad anauseam and then respond saying you will pay the corrected amount.

 

AS the max they can charge is a year for notice period (check your contract) the amount claimed is in excess of this for starters so even more to argue about.

 

You have now had over a month to do your figures and you offer nothing for us to comment on and then when they send what is a fairly simple to understand bill (£472 admin fee less what they say they will refund for service not provided)

 

we cant properly comment because we dont know what clauses there were in the original contract that cover ending the contract early or what notice period is required.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Ericsbrother,

 

I dont have much in writing from True Telecom,

 

most was set up verbally by phone,

 

and i have no terms and conditions from Chess,

 

I will get in touch with Chess regarding the not agreed extras which i never used such as the caller display which i never had and try and collect a paper trail,

 

I agree with you that the information has been a bit vague and i will try and get more information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

True Telecom Fixed Line Services Terms & Conditions

 

Cancellation

 

If you wish to end your contract with us,

You may do so by giving us at least 10 working days written notice before the end of any contract period, or the agreement end date.

 

Also from True Telecom

 

The monthly charge for select services is £2.75 per month per service.

 

I did not select any extra services.

 

I have not yet found the confirmation of agreement letter.

 

If i do not, would it be a good idea to request copy from Chess ?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it wont matter because if you agreed it verbally that is good enough.

 

However, assume you didnt and make them prove you did.

 

What we need to know is how long was the original contract period because they are chargng you for more than a year's worth and that cant appy on an annual renewal as the most they can claim is the balance of the year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ericsbrother,

The agreement was for a three year contract,

I have made a thorough search today and have not found a letter of confirmation,

 

I have two letters and two information booklets from True Telecom,

 

One letter is dated 2/26 2016 and is addressed to my company saying to check the information and the line rental will transfer in approximately 10 working days etc,

 

i will get it posted up here. This works out that the contract would end around 8 March 2019.

 

There is no mention of the contract duration on the information that i have to hand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then they are entitled to demand the sort of sum they are asking for.

 

You still need to work out all of the add ons you didnt agree to and deduct that from any offer to pay.

 

I would also be deducting the line rental charges as they dont own the copper,

BT does and you are still paying for this so they have cant add it to the bill as that is "betterment"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...