Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry, trying to catch up with all the questions.. I paid by BACS - it was the only option I was given. They are based in Wallasey, Wirral, and I think they have been there for some time.  I don't think they have disappeared.
    • The social worker saw some of the photographs.  Because of the timing, holidays, everyone busy etc she said she would go by my judgement as to whether Friend should be allowed home (This was before the service was carried out)  I sent her some photos but neither of us mentioned Friend not coming home - nobody wanted him to have to stay in the care home any longer, it was totally inappropriate.  She knew I was going to take some action with regard to the service, but we didn't speak again.  
    • Hi, yes, those are the people.   It's too late to ask SS to inspect.  This all happened in a big rush between xmas and new year; I complained to the woman I'd been dealing with, she liaised with the MD and came back with the £100 offer, took a couple of days, I refused, she then said I needed to contac the MD. When I emailed him, I got the out of office message back, and then, eventually, the offer of £150 which he deposited, without my agreement, into my account..  So it all took weeks.  I have plenty of photos though.
    • Yes that sounds correct Commensurate use
    • I don’t have the details to hand, they’ll be on an old IDE hard disk from my old computer and I’ll need to buy an adapter to access those files.   But from memory, I think the case was around 2016 in an English county court. A lawyer was posting progress on a case he was working on, I can’t remember which forum, arguing that Erudios DAF forms breeched unfair contract law.   Erudio settled the matter out of court just before the case was heard when the lawyers client accepted an offer to backdate all his deferments and make changes to future DAF forms.   Very soon after all the posts relating to the case were removed from the forum, I suspect as part of the settlement deal with Erudio.   TBH I wasn’t sure at the time that I was going to be able to use this anyway, given that there was no ruling on the case to refer to.   I just wanted to make them aware that I knew they had granted deferment to somebody who hadn’t used their DAF.   I turned 50 in February 2018.   Strangely, I can’t find a copy of the default notice or their final response.   I say strangely because I have what I thought were all my Erudio letters in a file in date order.   I can only think therefore that they were sent by email and I did have a period were I had to switch email providers and email addresses because emails were being lost, and then when I switched the previous provider deleted everything.   I did manage to backup some of those emails before the previous provider deleted them, but again they would be on my old IDE hard disk, so I don’t have access to them right now.   Sorry I know this isn’t much help.   How essential are these letters?
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Virgin Mobile Mis Sold & Credit Check

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1184 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi there, seeking advice of the legal variety...


Over a month ago now,

Virgin Mobile called me as an existing customer to try to upsell me a new phone and tariff.

After discussion an offer was made that was too good to decline.

A new S8 and suitable tariff for £29 per month over the period of 24 months.


The offer was made of two parts,

a loan for the device at £25 per month and the tariff of £4 per month.

At the end of the 24 month period, I would just be paying the tariff of £4 per month.


I was pleased with this offer and accepted.

I confirmed the offer several times and each time it was verified by the representative.

On the basis of the offer made and accepted,

I agreed to undergo a credit check for the purpose of the loan part of the offer.

The credit check was duly scored and passed.


The representative advised I would receive three emails, the first relating to the credit agreement.

I was instructed to click the link in the email and accept the terms of the credit agreement at which point the device could be dispatched.


While on the phone still to the representative the first email arrived but it contained details of a credit agreement for 36 monthly instalments, not the 24 agreed. I raised this with the representative who ultimately advised that the offer made still stands and that I should proceed and accept the credit agreement.

I advised that the agreement is wrong and so that a new one should be sent.


The call finished and I waited for a corrected agreement to arrive.

But it did not.

No further emails arrived.

Only two text messages advising that I had upgraded and that my tariff.


I called Virgin Media the next day to query the agreed sale and after discussion with that advisor, I requested a complaint be made.

The advisor stated I would be contacted within 48 hours about my complaint.


In the following 5 days I received no contact from Virgin (only other than to chase why I hadn't signed the agreement).

I then wrote to them laying out the situation and my complaint asking them to honour the offer.


No response had been received to that letter

I wrote another advising that I demand they remove the credit reference score they made from credit agency records, which has still not received a response.


It is clear that Virgin have no intention of addressing his complaint.


The issue for me is that they have performed a credit check against me based on a mis sold product.

That credit score needs to be removed.


1) how do I go about getting this done?


2) who can I complain o to ensure Virgin are exposed for this practice?




Mr P

Link to post
Share on other sites

A credit check is just a footprint to show they have looked at your file to confirm you are who you say you are. same would apply to an insurance co who you then decided not to take a policy with.


It does no damage and doesn't change the CRA's mystical numbers. It cant be removed and anyway it was done before they offered you the contract, not afterwards so not related to any problem you subsequently had.


If you are saying that there is a credit agreement in your public files that is wrong then yes, they should correct it but that will only indicate its current status so showing its existence and amount due or paid in the past so it wont matter about how long the agreement was for, the amount or any terms applied to it, just whether you are paying on time.


Asking for things that are beyond their powers or just completely incorrect so as to appear to be gibberish wont have helped you in this matter so to answer the last questions, you cant if the data recorded is correct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They did a 'hard' credit check/score - an actual credit application. That does affect future credit scoring, even if it was not taken. I subsequently queried this with Experian after reading your reply telling me I was asking for things that are completely incorrect or gibberish.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...