Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
    • The UK-based mining giant Anglo American says it has received a takeover proposal from Australia's BHP.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I reported benefit fraud


Lostcrown
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2329 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This woman who has recently been treating me like **** for being mentally ill (bipolar) I reported for benefit fraud.

 

Do you think I did the right thing?

 

Another YES.

 

This behaviour tars every benefit claimant with the same brush.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

She works at my local shop cash in hand, has a mobility car and is on esa and pip.

 

She might be doing permitted work, just because it's cash in hand doesn't necessarily make it illegal.

Start every day off with a smile and get it over with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If that's the case then the referral will not pass go and no action will be taken.

 

Better safe than sorry.

 

You might not feel that way if you were on the receiving end of a DWP compliance interview. I would personally never report benefit fraud unless I was 100% sure of my facts.

Start every day off with a smile and get it over with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She told me she's been on benefits since she was 16, now early 40's. I don't think it's permitted work plus she deserves it, treating me like a fruitcake when I have a mental illness.

 

I do wonder why she's on esa.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might not feel that way if you were on the receiving end of a DWP compliance interview. I would personally never report benefit fraud unless I was 100% sure of my facts.

 

As a FES Investigator it wouldn't bother me as I would know I had done nothing wrong, but horses for courses.

 

One can never be 100% sure of the facts, do you have access to DWP systems, payroll records, bank accounts etc of the people you suspect so that you know what has or hasn't been declared, what capital is held etc? No hence why a referral is made and investigated to whatever outcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

“just because it's cash in hand doesn't necessarily make it illegal.”

 

WTAF?

 

Some people do get paid cash in hand and some companies do put this through their books. It saves on bank charges for mainly cash type business, it's not illegal as long as it's reported to the taxman and logged in the business accounts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cash in hand is not necessarily avoiding tax. They might self assess, or its confused that they get paid in cash(with a payslip)

 

But I think in the context in this thread its paid "under the counter"

 

If it is paid cash and avoiding tax and not declaring income to DWP then I hope they throw the book at her.

 

I pay tax, and I'm fortunate enough to pay quite a bit every month. I dont mind paying. Its a civic duty ( and law) to pay.

I dont mind the government paying out in benefits to people who are entitled to it. ( disregard cuts etc,I have no control on that)

But what really pee's me off is people lying to get benefits they are not entitled too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cash in hand is not necessarily avoiding tax. They might self assess, or its confused that they get paid in cash(with a payslip)

 

But I think in the context in this thread its paid "under the counter"

 

If it is paid cash and avoiding tax and not declaring income to DWP then I hope they throw the book at her.

 

I pay tax, and I'm fortunate enough to pay quite a bit every month. I dont mind paying. Its a civic duty ( and law) to pay.

I dont mind the government paying out in benefits to people who are entitled to it. ( disregard cuts etc,I have no control on that)

But what really pee's me off is people lying to get benefits they are not entitled too.

 

I disagree. Many years ago I used to get paid cash on a Friday by my employer in a little brown envelope....

 

The military used to pay cash.

 

Neither of those examples are cash in hand which has always inferred dishonest and underhand dealings when it comes to declaring...

Link to post
Share on other sites

....but it invariably means it is...

 

 

You need to quote my next line.

 

I cannot "help" people that take the wrong meaning of cash in hand. I made It clear that I know the difference.

 

 

Its suggested that this is an under the counter payment. Which Is completely different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect we are saying the same thing but differently....

 

As an aside, is it just me or are your posts going missing? Threads are not showing up on my subscribed feed yet when logged out they show on new posts page.... bug?

 

Yes we are saying the same thing, I just agree with your 1st Line of " I disagree"

 

 

Yes posts going missing, not showing up and also going to a "post not available" page when clicked on latest posts. I suspect bugs

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a FES Investigator it wouldn't bother me as I would know I had done nothing wrong, but horses for courses.

 

One can never be 100% sure of the facts, do you have access to DWP systems, payroll records, bank accounts etc of the people you suspect so that you know what has or hasn't been declared, what capital is held etc? No hence why a referral is made and investigated to whatever outcome.

 

It is my experience that benefit fraudsters are generally very stupid and unable to keep their thieving mouths shut. It is a matter of some pride on the estate to be successfully screwing the system and they do like to let everyone know about it....

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP,

that is why they have hotlines for peope to phone.

 

As already said,

they have access to a lot of data and intl and wouldnt be telling you or anyone else about what they dig up anyway

so you should take no satisfaction or remorse for your actions, it is just passing a bit more info on.

 

As for cash in hand,

there are many places that just "net out" these payments

but a retail shop will find it harder to do that than say a hairdressers because of stock control. etc.

 

There was a case a few years ago where a restaurant owner local to me spent his time completely rewriting every order and using a second till to ring up all of the sales he wished to show the taxman and hide the others so he could pay staff in cash and avoid VAT, NI etc.

I cant remember what is was that made the taxman suspicious but they send people round t0 make trial purchases and so on.

 

When I worked in a pub as a student we had a (tax)man order a meal and then sat there and counted the peas to deterine whether profit on a plate of food tallied with what was indicated on the books.

 

His appearance made him stick out and the behaviour was the icing on the cake.

Brewery then dropped the manager in it to save their own skin.

Wouldnt be surprised if this lady's employer did the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might not feel that way if you were on the receiving end of a DWP compliance interview. I would personally never report benefit fraud unless I was 100% sure of my facts.

 

Having been reported and had to go through a compliance interview, I agree with you completely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2329 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...