Jump to content


Betty55

PRA Claimform - old MBNA Credit card debt ***Claim Dismissed***

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 456 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday I received a notification that the trial is on the 21st August and will last 1 day!

After coming this far I am now having second thought about continuing.

 

The main (or only) thing I think have to defend myself is the so called “Agreement” provided by the claimant.

 

I would appreciate an honest opinion from anyone as to whether anyone thinks it is worth the stress and taking time off work to prepare/attend if I don’t have a great case. I

 

can’t imagine why it will take a whole day and with it being fast track I think the claimant is planning to hammer the costs too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it is illegible and therefore pursuant to sec61 (1 c) CCA1974 ...unenforceable...along with the points stated by Shammy re section 127.

 

Assuming you get the right judge on the right day...up to speed on the CCA 1974.....he should follow legislation.

 

But if this is getting a little stressful Betty its your call...you have time to negotiate with the Solictor a settlement vis a Tomlin Order.

 

We appreciate this is not for everyone and we are fully aware its Fast Track with costs implications.

 

You must decide what best for you.

 

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy

Yes I have some thinking to do.

It’s a gamble on the DJ.

 

If I lose with costs and interest it will end up well over 20k on what was originally just under 13k. Part of me wants to fight it all the way but it is stressful.

 

On their DQ asking how many witnesses they intend to have they put a zero.

Was kinda hoping they may stick to it and not show up!,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All DCAs put nil witness on the DQs..they dont call witnesses as the claimant and rely on representation.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Betty, just posting to say I'm looking in, should you need any help.

 

Sham

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Shamrock

I’ve buried myself in the paperwork for the last few few days and Even up until the last minute wasnt sure I could do it but

 

I did it, and the case was dismissed Yaaaaayyyy

 

Have a feeling it’s not the end of it and they will be back but it’s done for now

Support of everyone on here has really helped, another donation on its way

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well done Betty

 

could you expand on what it got dismissed for please

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I had 2 main arguments.

 

There was no evidence that I got a copy of the agreement at time of signing as 2 of the conditions were on the envelope you post it in and were difficult to read and the agreement was not linked to the account number of claim in either the documents or claimant WS.

 

The 2nd thing was the Default notice provided by the claimant.

This was never served on me and the one they provided referred to a breach of the wrong conditions so not compliant with s88.

 

The judge decided the dn issues should be dealt with first as if that part of the claim failed there would be no point looking at the rest.

 

In relation to the dn the thing was printed on paper referring to the FCA when the FCA did not take over the regulation of consumer credit until over a year after the date on the DN.

 

I argued that there is no way that dn could be a an actual copy or photocopy of a Valid DN .

The claimant had not accounted for these issues in their SWS despite me raising them in my WS.

 

There was no evidence the dn was sent.

The judge said if the person who had written the statement was there and a witnesss from mbna then they may have been able to explain the systems for sending DNS and how they are copied.

 

I said I questioned the provenance of the DN.

plus there was a significant difference in the monetary demand on the dn and a statement I had dated a few days later.

 

I think the DN was cobbled together either by the OC or PRA hence the errors made on it.

Someone dropped the ball on that piece of fiction

Edited by dx100uk
spacing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great news Betty! Hearing news of anyone getting one over on PRA/Aktiv Kapital gives me a bit of a thrill! :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I think they may try again though which is a worry but I’m just so glad that I went through with it. I will have to wait see what happens next but they definitely do some creative documents. A case that helped me as had some similar issues was PRA v Segal ......same DN issue 😀😀

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't try again Betty without a dam good reason and the courts permission, so I wouldn't stress about that possibility :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really? I didn’t know if they were able to appeal it or have a second go.......it was nerve wracking but the DJ was good. It was listed for a whole day but was done in less than 2 hoursas he just tried the one issue 😀

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

title updated

 

well done everyone

 

dx

 

 

please consider a donation to keep us here..


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yeh and I’m sure their costs were listed as about 2k. Think I went into the wrong job!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They can only appeal if the judge made an error in law in his decision and in this case he was correct under the CCA 1974

 

plus they would have asked at the end of the hearing for permission to appeal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes special thanks to dx and Andy

Another donation just made

 

I didn’t hear the rep ask for appeal "............but I was a bit distracted by nerves. Will a copy of the result be sent to me?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes the court will send you a copy of the judgment usually take a week or so

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great thanks jon

I was lucky to get a good DJ. Straight away he seemed to have a grasp of the errors in case

I got the feeling the rep knew too. Came straight to me when I arrived and asked if I’d like to make an offer for repayments

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent result ...decent judge by the sounds of it who knew and followed the CCA1974.(for a change)

 

And considering this was Fast Track..even more impressive.

 

Given the claim was dismissed on a default notice issue...it would be pointless trying again as it cant be corrected after the event.

 

Well done Betty

 

 

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy

 

Yes the DJ said he could not be sure the DN was ever sent.

Don’t think he was impressed the author of the WS did not attend.

Plus a few of the points I made in my WS were not responded to in their SWS.

 

I think that legal judgement helped as its rather curious how the defendant in that case also got a copy of mbna DN off PRA and it referred to breach of the wrong conditions when comparing to the CA. The same conditions that was in the one they sent me. And it was a 2012 DN on FCA paper.

 

I have one question.

Can PRA issues a new DN?

I thought it was only the OC who can.

 

I think the DJ said something to their rep along the lines of “well unless you can issue a default notice start again with this ....”

I wasn’t sure if he WAS being serious

Edited by dx100uk
spacing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the OC is the only person that can issue a DN, DCA's cannot issue them

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Betty

 

 

I really should not worry; I had a very similar experience with MKDP around three years ago and have heard nothing from them since.

 

 

Love

 

 

Vic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

I just want it to be over......... I have other battles ahead so will be glad to know this one is done with

 

Betty

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...