Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • a chargeback via a paypal account used in an ebay sale doesn't usually result in funds being sucked from your bank account,  just that you attain a paypal negative balance. as you saying the money was taken by paypal from your bank account without you authorising this? or is it directly the buyers name that is shown? regarding the chargeback but either way you bank account HAS been debited? dx  
    • what solicitor is the PAPLOC from? then just search xxxx snotty letter dx  
    • moved to the debt self help forum. plenty of like threads here to read along with the ones you've done so far..good work. last thing you ever want to do is look at any kind of IVO/BK or anything alike concerning consumer debt, never do that, turns unsecured debts into secured ones in many instances. your best bet for now is p'haps looks at  Options for dealing with your debts: Breathing Space (Debt Respite Scheme) - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) sadly you have to go thru one of the free debt charities to invoke that but DON'T be tempted to also open up a DMP with them, just get the Breathing Space done. get that in place that gives you at leasy 60 days buffer you've also goto to realise you'll probably get a default once breathing space is in place, bit if not it might pay you to withhold payments even after BS then p'haps re start payments once a DN for each debt is issued and registered. at least that way, whatever happens in 6yrs the debt will drop off dx  
    • Hello, I am a private seller and recently sold a pair of trainers on eBay.  Everything seemed fine until just after the eBay 30 day mbg had expired.  The buyer contacted me with photos showing me that both shoes had ripped.  He wanted his money back, and after refusing to refund him, he then left me retaliatory and defamatory feedback on my profile to the effect that I had sold him fake trainers (this was removed by eBay).  He then initiated a chargeback via Paypal.  Invariably, the outcome was in his favour, and I have now been charged for the cost of the trainers.  I would have also been stung for the chargeback fee, but eBay refunded this.  Incidentally, I do have the email receipt of the trainers from when I bought them from a well-established and bona fide online retailer.  The susbequent conversation with eBay followed its predictable course, i.e. the chargeback is out of their hands etc. I have been in contact with citizens advice, and my bank.  Citizens advice told me that as a private seller I'm responsible for the "Title and description" of the goods, but not the performance, or the fitness for purpose.  To me it is clear; if you receive something that's not as described, you don't then use the goods, and more than 30 days later claim 'not as described'.  In my mind, this makes the claim fraudulent.  He's used the 'they're fake' card to give credence to a 'not as described' claim here, obviously, without any evidence.  My understanding is that the chargeback is unlawful, because the trainers were shipped as described.  However, I read something on an eBay forum regarding sellers having no statutory rights, i.e. no right to appeal against a chargeback decision, or to complain to the financial ombudsman.  Does this mean that if my bank disputes the charge on my behalf, it will be to no avail, even if it's recognisably a fraudulent chargeback?  I have reported it via the Action fraud website. Any advice, anyone?  Would be most grateful!
    • Thank you, I have drafted my letters and started to complete the reply form, printed from this site and not using the one they provided.    2 questions, on the forum link it says to tick box D & I, the reason for box D will be given on my thread, what would my answer be to "I dispute the debt"?  Do I send anything for the Vodafone debt they have included?  I've only done 118 loan s. 77 & capital one credit cards so. 78    Thank you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tax credits compliance letter - being claiming single benefits when I have a partner


Jbthirtytwo32
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2164 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning,

I have found this site via various google searches and really hope someone can help.

 

I have been claiming ctc & wtc as a single person but have a partner living with me. Stupid I know.

It was always a case of I will let them know but never have.

 

I have become totally reliant on the money due to large debt issues, payday loans, doorstep loans etc.

No excuse, Im just rubbish with money and an idiot.

 

Yesterday I received a letter from HMRC compliance saying they have reason to believe Mr X is living at my address and wish to check a 6 month period of my current claim.

 

I rang up, told the adviser that my partner indeed lives here since the date they are querying, but volunteered no more info than that and was not asked.

He said he would stop the claim and a letter will be sent re overpayments (around £3000 I think).

He said I do not need to do anything further.

 

Is this all I have to do?

Is it only the 6 months stated in the letter they seem to be concerned about?

 

I am terrified they will check my last 5 years of claims as I no doubt will owe tens of thousands. 30000 +

 

I know have been stupid and everything else.

Obviously havent slept worrying about the implications of court, jail and so on.

My partner knows not a thing about this.

 

Has anyone else ever been in this situation or similar that could give me some idea of what happens next.

 

I am so ashamed of myself and feel ill at the thought of prosecution and it all being made public.

Please please can someone reply as I feel bereft.

Thank you for reading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should imagine that the 6 months is just an initial review period for compliance checks. Going by what i have read, at some point, you are likely to be asked to attend a compliance interview, where they will go through information with you. At that point, it might well become obvious that your change of circumstances happened a long time ago.

 

You really have no choice but to discuss this with your partner and try to face this together. They are going to find out about it pretty soon and it might be better to tell them. They might well then try to support you through dealing with this.

 

Claiming any benefits you know you are not entitled to is fraudulent, as you probably realise. It is now about how you face up to what has happened and in my opinion, you really need to seek specialist legal advice from someone qualified that handles benefit cases. If you are prosecuted for benefit fraud, i don't think anyone can tell you with certainty what the outcome would be. It would depend on the evidence and any mitigation provided.

 

So i would advise these actions.

 

1) Tell your partner of this benefits issue

2) Make enquiries with Citizens Advice and other bodies e.g local legal advice centres, about what help you can obtain to tackle a potential benefit fraud situation.

3) Start to deal with your debt problems. If you visit this sites debt page, why don't you start a thread in general debt issues, listing what debts you have, with general information about what is happening with them. You will then get advice about what you should be doing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for taking the time to reply.

I have spoken to my partner this morning so he is now aware of the full extent of my situation.

 

The hmrc adviser said I would receive a letter within the week stating the amount of overpayment.

 

I am going to try and not worry until then see what the letter says.

If invited to interview etc I will be upfront with a full disclosure.

I just hope this will be enough for them to go down the route of recovery of the overpayment and not send me to jail.

Edited by Jbthirtytwo32
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

Prison is rare for benefits fraud, wait and see what's in HMRC's letter before you start thinking about how it will pan out.

 

I agree with Uncle Bulgaria, start another thread in our debt forum for advice on how to get that situation under control.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi honeybee and thank you also for taking the time to reply.

 

I think the overpayment for the period they have referenced will be about 3000.

Having sat and looked at incomings and outgoings this morning with ny partner I think I would be able to repay this within a year.

I am also already looking into upping my hours to nearer full time if I can, in order to facilitate paying this back.

 

My main concern is although they have only asked about a recent few months, what if they look at everything I have ever claimed.

It was be around 30,000 I think. Would they not impose a custodial sentence even for that?

 

I rang hmrc and said my partner lived here over the months queried.

The man said my claim would be stopped and that was all I needed to do.

 

He said i would receive a letter about the overpayment and he was actually really nice saying when I ring to sort out repayment I must declare every single penny, even down to loo roll etc to make sure i offer a realistic repayment.

It just seemed to be resolved very quickly and easily?

 

Im worried sick which I know is of my own doing

If anyone is reading this and is in my situation I urge you to please come clean.

The way I feel now is not worth anything you can claim.

Thank you honeybee

Edited by Jbthirtytwo32
Link to post
Share on other sites

Try to think of this overpayment issue as being two separate stages.

 

1) The overpayment issue based on what they know already i.e £3000, which you would arrange to repay.

 

2) A further investigation into benefit fraud going back further than the 6 months.

 

At this moment, you don't know whether DWP will actually begin stage 2) and invite you to attend an interview, after supplying financial information going back years. In my earlier reply, i made a presumption that DWP would go beyond stage 1) and i think that is also what you are thinking.

 

You don't know whether there will be any continuing investigations by DWP or even your local council authority in regard to council tax reduction benefits you might have received. It might just be stage 1) repayment of the more recent overpayment and that is the end of it.

 

Think you just need to see what happens. If you are told that you will be investigated for benefit fraud, then obtain legal advice.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I, too, suspect that they won't limit their inquiries to the last six months.

If they decide to interview you under caution, you should get formal legal advice.

 

I wouldn't volunteer the information that this has been going on 5 years, but DON'T try and hide it if asked:

a) They are likely to find out anyhow, and

b) Trying to conceal it when directly asked can worsen the situation, both in terms of likelihood of prosecution, and in terms of penalty....

 

If they do follow this up, and interview you, a prosecution is fairly likely, for Tax Credit fraud, under S.35 of the Tax Credits Act 2002.

This would be due to the protracted duration of the fraud (5 years). Did you have a partner living with you when you first claimed (and did you state at that time you were single?) - a claim being false from the outset makes prosecution more likely (and again, increases the severity of likely penalty).

 

http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/latest_news/director_of_public_prosecutions_sets_out_charging_standards_for_benefit_and_tax_credit_fraud/

http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/v_to_z/welfare_rural_and_health_cases/index.html (in particular the 'tax credits offences' section).

 

If it did go to court, the press have reported a decrease in prison sentences for benefit fraud:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/709584/Benefit-cheats-spared-jail-fraud-numbers-rocket

 

The guidelines on the likely penalty IF you were prosecuted is:

https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/item/benefit-fraud/

 

S.35 of the Tax Credits Act 2002, can be prosecuted 'either wa'y (Magistrates or Crown Court), although £30,000 of fraudulent claim makes a Crown Court trial a distinct possibility (and attempting to conceal evidence would make it likely, hence my earlier advice to be honest when questioned..... not to volunteer information but don't try to hide it if asked!).

Culpability B seems to best fit what you have described, with category 4 due to the value (and that table notes the 'starting point' is foir a value of £30,000)

Culpabiity B, Category 4, with a starting point for value £30,000 has a starting point of 36 weeks custody, BUT a range of 'Medium level community order – 21 months’ custody', so a prison sentence is by no means inevitable, (and even if given, could be suspended!).

 

If they start to look beyond the last 6 months, and if they ask to have an interview under caution (IUC), I urge you to seek formal legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

might pay you to look at you debts too

if you've multiple PDL's and doorstep loans

then many might well be unlawful and get wiped under an irresponsible lending claim or two.

 

have a look at

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?482367-CAG-PDL-Reclaim-Guide-Indepth-Step-By-Step

 

esp if you credit file was already poor you could be onto a winner here.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...