Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Work from home is "an aberration" that will be corrected as soon as possible says Goldman Sachs chief. View the full article
    • Work from home is "an aberration" that will be corrected as soon as possible says Goldman Sachs chief. View the full article
    • The mini electric vehicle being made by China's biggest carmaker is now outselling Tesla two to one. View the full article
    • https://www.bindmans.com/news/neale-v-dpp-the-right-to-silence-citizens-duties-and-coronavirus-regulations   Perhaps the OP should have said nothing - and risked arrest!   "Firstly, the case calls into question the logic behind aspects of the criminal justice response to the public health crisis created by the Coronavirus pandemic...   "Secondly, it is clear that some police officers have misunderstood and misstated their powers, and citizens’ obligations, under the Regulations and at common law...   "Thirdly, the case confirms reasonable excuses for being outside are not limited to those explicitly set out in the Regulations. Police officers considering whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that an offence has been committed under the Regulations so that an FPN may be issued, or the reasonable grounds for suspicion that are necessary for an arrest, should give proper consideration to any explanation given by members of the public (and what a court might think of them) rather than only recognising those exceptions explicitly listed in the Regulations and/or government guidance...   Fourthly, the case is an example of a failure of the CPS review into prosecutions brought under Coronavirus Regulations, which has found that alarming numbers of cases were wrongly charged..."   Above quotes from the Bindman's article, not the decision.  Case arose from the first lockdown and was in Wales.  Same now?  Also was about not being at home - not mask wearing.    
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Lowells 2xPAPLOC now Claimform - Old Vanquis Card debt


Recommended Posts

Cant you just drop it off at your local county court where the hearing is being held  and email a copy to the claimants sols? You should only have a 1 page statement and possibly 2 exhibits...what bundle are you on about ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

its what lowells hold and produce... whatever the OC has we keep to ourselves...

Yes I can drop off I’ll post also so there is atleast some proof of receipt 

 

the bundle outlined in the letter the court sent me above regarding the remote hearing 

it is called a bundle but yes compromises of the Statement and documents

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hardly a bundle then.... 1 x statement 1 x CPR 314 request 1x CCA request  =3 sheets :becky:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

so for ref the right one is?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Witness statement should be 2 pages tops and any exhibit they refer to within it 3/4.....would be useful to have on your thread.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan it up to one multipage PDF

don't need for account statements (bar 1 for example) nor the cover sheets of each exhibit

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

about to finalise my WS,

 

one question before i upload

- would an SAR request to Vanquis not include a notice of default and notice of assignment,

should i use these documents from Vanquis in my WS?

it should include all documentation sent prior to the request?

 

The default notice Lowell have uploaded states 2015 and i note no logo like i have with the letter from Vanquis.

 

SAR was way after this and neither acknowledged it,

infact i have a letter from Lowell stating they are awaiting it after my CPR request which was in 2019

 

Vanquis sent an SAR,

but the accompanying letter only states it includes my statements and CCA, with reconstituted terms,

but these terms (i uploaded previously) have more pages than those submitted in the WS of Lowell's (above)

 

Not sure whether this is relevant to use or will go against me somehow

Link to post
Share on other sites

what are you indicating here?

 

are you saying that the documents lowell have exhibited in their WS, those being the DN and the agreement T&C's are DIFFERENT from those you got directly from the OC after submitting an SAR to them?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to clarify:

 

lowells WS includes a DN which i never received, dated 2015.

My SAR to Vanquis was 2017,

my CPR request to Lowell and

2 x PAP was 2019,

none included the DN,

with letters from both outlining what was included in the letter they sent.

So neither have confirmed in writing here is the DN

 

both the Vanquis SAR does not indicate any inclusion of this in their letter.

Also lowells reply to my CPR states it is awaiting a copy of it from the OC

 

I would have thought a SAR from the OC would include all documents at the time of request,

if my req was 2017 and this supposed DN letter Lowell's attached is 2015,

should it have not been included,

and mentioned in the letter from vanquis?

 

In short Vanquis letter states 'here is your agreement and T & C's'

- Lowell letter states

'here is your statement, agreement and notice of assignment, we are awaiting DN'

 

The t & C's Lowell submitted are in part what Vanquis sent me, and also what lowells originally sent me, BUT some pages are missing from the WS T & C's of which both sent prior

 

im basing the weight of my WS on:

- not receiving a correct CCA, terms reconstituted

- no DN

 

Would it just be easier if i upload my WS as it is and i can remove what you think isn't right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no requirement for the OC to keep a copy of the DN

however, they should hold record that one WAS sent.

this will must be noted in the comms/account log, i'e the log of where they state what actions they took and interactions they had with you.

look there at the date of lowells supposed copy date of the DN they supplied to see if it shows.

 

as for the T&C's disclosed by lowells ideally they should be the same as you have attained from the OC directly.

 

NOA can be sent by the debt buyer using the OC's letterhead and will not be contained within an SAR return from an OC.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Guys, i think ive finalised it now

 

I have put my defence and statement together, not sure i should do them separately or if it matters

I have uploaded as PDF but can paste into the thread if easier

i havent uploaded the exhibits but i can if required upload the entire bundle

i wasnt going to add any other pages so not sure if i need to include as much as they did like their WS, their exhibits, original claim and forms etc

 

My bundle content was going to be:

- defence

- WS

- exhibits

 

Grateful yet again for the support and cannot wait for this to be over

 

MY WS LOWELL VANQUIS.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why have you included a copy of your defence ?  The court and claimant already have this .

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed another couple of WS had them but also the court letter states to include everything as they may not have access on the day

 

'the hearing bundle should in as much as is essential to assist the court with the remote hearing of the matter (in circumstances where the judge is unlikely to have access to the court file) contain such documents as follows as may be relevant, appropriate and applicable to the type of hearing in question:

- the statements of case (claim form, particulars of claim, defence and counterclaim and any reply and defence to any counterclaim

- any directions questionnaires and proposed directions

- any case summary and chronology

- any previous orders that are relevant to the remote hearing

- any other essential documents and witness statements that the court will require to determine the issues that fall for determinatioon at the remote hearing

- A draft order '

 

This is why I was confused as to what to include, whether it needs to be indexed etc

Edited by patterns
Link to post
Share on other sites

Then include it...but separate...not as part of the witness statement.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok amended

My bundle will include:

 

My Defence

My WS including case summary

Exhibits

 

Do i need to include any other documents or an index page as a similar layout to lowells? Im presuming i can simply refer to the exhibits they supplied as opposed to include them in my bundle seeing as im addressing their points in WS also? i have my own exhibits ofcourse

 

Im not sure if i need to include all the claim forms, directions questionaire etc etc or again because lowell have if that is relevant for the bundle?

 

MY WS LOWELL VANQUIS.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Afraid not...you cant refer to the claimants exhibits within your statement....this is your standard disclosure and statement...if you make reference to a document you must finish the paragraph with see exhibit 1/2/3/ etc etc then attach a an index with all the exhibits numbered and named and then attach all the exhibits to the index sheet......simples.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...