Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capquest and defaulted Marbles Card debt


aburobert
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2307 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Looking for a quick bit of advice.

 

Capquest purchased a defaulted Marbles credit card debt and are reporting it as a current credit card account with themselves. They have been doing this for about a year or so and I only noticed when I checked my credit reports with both Noddle and Clearscore.

 

I have written to Capquest requesting they either prove I have a current credit card account with them or remove the entry from my files with the credit reference agencies. They have replied with a copy of the notice of assignment showing they purchased the debt. Now I have no argument they now own the debt - my argument is they are telling porky pies reporting I have a current credit card account with them and that the marbles account defaulted about seven years ago.

 

As they are giving me the run around who do I report them to for entering false information with the credit reference agencies?

Edited by aburobert
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

get proof it was defaulted 7yrs ago.

 

send them a letter with that proof

give them 14 days to remove the account

else you'll complain to the ICO and seek financial compensation.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you would yes

unless you have an old credit file copy showing it?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Today I received my SAR details back and they were extremely sparse.

 

No signed agreement and no copy or mention of a default notice.

 

Now i did SAR this account when it was a Beneficial account and they came up with the signed agreement. Since then it has changed hands a few times.

 

My question is - since there appears to be no signed copy any more can I put this account into dispute until they can come up with a signed agreement.

 

All they came up with this time is a copy of terms and conditions and a ream or so of copy statements and a computer print of of some kind of account log. This I have carefully gone through and no default notice sent is recorded.

 

The original Beneficial SAR made several years ago I still have somewhere but it is in storage in several dozen large boxes. Is it worth tracking this down or is it best to let sleeping dogs lie and ask Capquest to prove I owe the money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no such thing as putting it into dispute.

 

find the Default notice copy

or written proof that is was defaulted xyz date +6yrs ago then as post 2

there no harm in sending them a CCA request too [the DCA]

 

you did send the sar to HFC? [beneficial]

if you can find the original agreement and the T&C's then it will be very very useful to compare against the bogroll capquest might send re CCA request

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX - as always I appreciate your input.

 

Received a letter on Saturday informing me the debt has now passed to an outfit called NCO Europe Ltd so am presuming my CCA request now goes to them rather than Capquest?

 

I will send on Wednesday - I'm away for a few days. Will post up again once I have received a reply from the new owners!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capquest in all their recent messages (by letter) state the account was purchased from Marbles Credit card - so they are presumably still the owners? And that NCO are just managing the account on their behalf. I have got a copy of the notice of assignment here somewhere that Capquest sent when they purchased the debt.

 

Anyway do I send to Capquest or NCO?

Link to post
Share on other sites

send to Capquest with payment of `1 x Postal Order for pound Stating for regulatory purposes only Recorded delivery, send a copy of request to NCO, is what I would do?

 

keep copy on files of all request and letters by date filing

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

read and follow CCA request and all its posts in that thread

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...