Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A devaluing currency and hard economic conditions make cryptocurrencies attractive despite the risks. View the full article
    • The Serum Institute of India isn't a household name, but it's the world's largest vaccine maker. View the full article
    • Lower commuting costs, cancelled holidays and fewer meals out boost some bank accounts, a report says. View the full article
    • Lower commuting costs, cancelled holidays and fewer meals out boost some bank accounts, a report says. View the full article
    • Thanks for the reply     Name of the Claimant ? CABOT FINANCIAL (UK) LIMITED   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 18/02/2021   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total) -   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? By anagreement between New Day Ltd RE Marbles & the Defendant with a credit card. The Defendant failed to make the minimum payments due. The Agreement was terminated following the service of a default notice. The Agreement was assigned to the Claimant. THE CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS 1. 2140.14  2. Costs   What is the total value of the claim? £2325.14   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? I could have   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? Not Sure but im going to look back on old emails. But I think it would have been around 2018.   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? If I did it would have been online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? No but there is a DCA on there that could be for this.   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt Purchaser by the looks of it.   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I could have but I’ll need to look back.   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not sure but its possible.   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Not sure but its possible.    What was the date of your last payment? I don’t know.   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No.   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No.
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1235 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi all ,Someone knocked on the front door tonight offering a free survey for any damp walls after cavity wall insulation

since we have had the walls insulated a few years ago damp has got a grip in both upstairs bedrooms ,

they seem to be offering a no win no fee service .

 

 

Apparently the problem has been mentioned in the house of commons and could be the next PPI ,

anyone got any views ,

heres the link to the MP's comments.

Thanks Andy.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-39602540

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they can do it ...so can you for free

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Article mentions CIGA so get in touch with them rather than using someone who cold calls.

 

As it stands there is no compensation scheme so no win no fee?

who do they intend to claim from I wonder?

they arent there out of the goodness of their hearts.

 

I always say no to any cold callers, regardless of how wonderful the offer is.

i might have missed out on a fortune in gold from Ghana, General Sani Abachas hidden millions and god knows how many free surveys but I can live with that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They came out today ,

tested the walls,

agreed there was damp and it was likely from the incorrectly applied cavity insulation,

asked us to sign a no win no fee agreement

and that they would attempt to get compensation to cover removal/repair of the insulation or a cash payment to us,

I explained I would rather take a few days to read through ........

 

 

after reading through there seems to be all kinds of situations were I would be responsible for fees/insurance costs and their solicitors costs.

 

 

Think we will give it a miss.

 

Thanks Andy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

always the way...

RUN!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
They came out today ,

tested the walls,

agreed there was damp[...]

 

Did they use a meter with two prongs on the end that is poked in to the walls ?

 

If so, you might want to have a read of this: https://www.heritage-house.org/damp-and-condensation/the-ping-prong-meter-guilty-of-fraud.html

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

Quote
No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked at the Telegraph article linked here and a pop up advert forguess who came up on the page ;pointing out what a bunch of badits they are- yes, the Cavity claim group and even the same phone number of the soliciotrs you are told to avoid.

Someone has a sense of humour at google adsense (or are completely stupid-vote now)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...