Jump to content
Bookworm

NHS Prescription Penalty Fine.

Recommended Posts

Not really looking for advice, but since I commented on someone else's thread, I thought I'd better start my own just to keep things straight:

 

I get a pre-paid certificate for my prescriptions, have done so for a few years now. I pay by DD, £10.40 a month, I don't notice it coming out of my account, I get a letter once a year telling me it's been renewed, and I tick the box at the back of my prescriptions, no fuss, no hassle, my pharmacist has known me for over 20 years, that's it.

 

Or so I thought...

 

Got a letter the other day telling me that I had got myself a free prescription and that I didn't have a valid certificate, so I was being fined, bla bla, pay up or there'll be a surcharge...

 

I e-mailed back to appeal, saying it must be a mistake, as I am on the pre-payment scheme, giving them the Direct Debit Ref.

A few e-mails back and forth, where they couldn't find my name, my address, the DD, the usual, before finally working out that they stopped my DD a few months ago (but not the other one, in hubby's name, which is probably why I didn't notice!) and so, I cheated and I must pay.

 

Yeah. No. I don't think so. I have pointed out nicely that they were the ones who cancelled my DD (for reasons best known to themselves), who didn't notify me that they had done so, I have acted in good faith all along, and the legislation is on my side, so I'm not paying, take me to court if you want the money, because I'm not doing it until a judge says so.

 

That's where we're at. I'll let you know what happens next, if anything.

 

Meanwhile, I can't even apply for a new pre-paid certificate, because their website is not working! :!:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what did you think when you didn't get the letter saying your card had been renewed with a new card showing the new start and finish date which you would have received as you are supposed to show it when you collect your prescription like this one

 

http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-a-nhs-prescription-prepayment-certificate-card-on-a-white-background-60918443.html

 

They may have been the ones to cancel but you are the one who should have realised when you didn't get your new certificate and the onus is on you to make sure you have the correct exemption,

 

Pharmacists are supposed to make you aware that unless you show your proper exemption then they will mark the prescription as evidence not seen,

because you sign a declaration to say you have proper exemption and that if you don't (on the day you are asked to pay) you may get a fine,

 

if anything your Pharmacist is in the wrong because they haven't done their job in making you aware of the consequences of signing the aforementioned declaration

 

You say you have legislation on your side that's not the case the legislation is on the side of the NHSBSA which is The National Health Service (Penalty Charge) Regulations 1999,

 

you can try the 'can show that you did not act wrongfully, with any lack of care ' route

but I would suspect they would answer that not realising your certificate had expired would show 'lack of care'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I may be talking nonsense, since I am not familiar with the prescription certificate system, but how difficult would it be and how much more expensive to have a card, rather like a bank card, that has an expiry date built in and which could be checked by the pharmacist before dispensing? Better still, an app, which would be more cost effective in the long-term.

 

Legally, it may be that the onus is on the patient to check that the certificate is in order, but I can see that it would be an easy mistake to make in this hectic world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a card, with an expiry date.

MF's point (if I've understood correctly) is that the OP should have checked, when they didn't receive their new card with the new expiry date.......

 

Pharmacies don't INSIST on seeing the card, to check.

 

People can still offer over the card, if they choose.

 

The pharmacies would probably face riots if they did insist,

 

from the people who say "I never carry my card, I don't have to. I just sign / tick the boxes on the back".

 

The upside of that : convenience, and less checking at the pharmacy stage. The downside: if the person doesn't have a valid certificate, they risk the penalty ..........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think what booky was saying her ppc was still in date that was why it was still being used and wasn't aware until received the letter stating the fine then tried to get a new one. Not using it fraudently


 

 

A-Z Index

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOW NOT TO CLAIM...Click here!

 

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

 

.please remember that any advice i give is purely my own experience or opinion thankyou

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hadn't thought of that of course if her certificate was in date the OP would have every expectation that it was still valid and would have every right to expect to be able to use it as she didn't know it hadn't been paid for,

 

I am wondering why they stopped the DD,

it may that she is coming up to 60 and therefore would have paying for something she had no reason to use for the normal duration of the certificate ,

 

I have heard of this happening which leaves people in limbo,

 

hope the OP comes back and lets us know

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For starters,

certificates haven't come with a card for a few years.

You just get a letter.

The reason I didn't notice is because you can't prove a negative.

It gets renewed every year,

I open the letter, put it on top of the pile of letters to be filed.

 

Secondly,

even if it had crossed my mind,

the fact that hubby gets one as well means that it didn't even register in my mind that we got 1, not 2 letters (they don't come at the same time, before you ask).

 

Thirdly,

I disagree with your assertion that the law is not on my side:

The Direct Debit Guarantee is quite specific that an instruction must be carried out unless and until *I* advise them to stop.

That same legislation which normally puts the onus on us customers to check we are not being charged over and over again, works both ways:

I gave them instructions,

they carried them out,

then decided to stop carrying them out.

 

There is also an interesting case law which I used extensively in the old bank charges days,

when the banks tried to tell us it was our responsibility to check our bank statements.

 

Turns out that this isn't the case,

I can't remember the name right now,

but I have it on file in my old paperwork,

on the lines of Phillips v Honk-Kong company,

I'll dust it out when and if I need.

 

Finally,

you are not a judge,

and whether you think I am right or wrong,

you cannot possibly know who the courts will agree with,

 

so instead of coming across all sanctimonious with the "it's your responsibility" nonsense,

why don't you stop with the gaslighting?

 

Thanks.

 

PS: No, I am nowhere near 60.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest you ring 0300 330 1343 and try and speak to the nice Geordie lady that I have just spoken to

I rang them to check (so I could apologise to you if I was wrong )

guess what she confirmed that you do indeed get a credit card size certificate she described it to me

and confirmed its the certificate that you show the pharmacist

its the same as the one on the link I supplied,

so where is yours and is it in date?

 

And its not sanctimonious or nonsense to say that's it is your responsibility to check that you have proper entitlement you signed a declaration to say that that you confirm that the information is correct and complete and that you confirm proper entitlement and it is your responsibility to ensure you have the correct documentation before signing even if you don't have it with you at the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When we get a pre-pay (admittedly on a “3 month”, “only renewed when we need” basis, rather than an annual direct debit basis), we get sent a card, which shows an expiry date.

 

I sometimes pick up prescriptions for someone be who has a medical exemption certificate. They have a card (I keep a photo of it on my phone in case the pharmacy ask me for it’s number), and it has both ‘valid from’ and ‘expires end’ dates (5 years apart).

 

https://apps.nhsbsa.nhs.uk/ppcwebsales/patient.do

Save money by buying a 3 or 12-month prescription prepayment. Buying online is quick and easy.

 

What you can buy

 

A prescription costs £8.60 per item, but prepayment costs:

£29.10 for 3 months - card payment

£104 for 12 months - card or Direct Debit (10-monthly instalments of £10.40)

You can start your prepayment:

today

any date in the next month (ready for your next pharmacy visit)

any date in the past month (if you have a refund form from the pharmacist)

What you get

 

We'll post your prescription prepayment certificate to you. Pharmacies ask for this as evidence of prepayment.

 

If you have to pay a prescription charge while waiting for your evidence, you can get a refund.

 

You will need to ask pharmacy staff for an NHS refund form (FP57) when you pay for your prescription.

 

You only get this form at the time you pay. You cannot get one later.

 

a) this suggests they send a card for both the 3-month prepayment (which I have personal experience of), and the 12-month Direct debit card.

b) if someone is unsure they have a valid certificate they can pay the prescription charge and reclaim it (But need to get the FP57 form at the time, see above)

 

Does the 12-month Card automatically renew??

Or is it “just an option to spread the cost for the year over 10 months”?

 

Does the 12-month Card automatically renew??

Or is it “just an option to spread the cost for the year over 10 months”?

 

https://www.nhsbsa.nhs.uk/help-nhs-prescription-costs/prescription-prepayment-certificates

 

This allows you to spread the cost by paying for your PPC in 10 monthly instalments. By using this option we can also normally automatically renew your PPC, so you don’t have to worry about forgetting to renew your PPC.

 

If you choose to pay by Direct Debit, you are entering into a commitment to pay all of the instalments. If you use your PPC after failing to pay an instalment you may face penalty charges.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to get a card with my certificate, yes.

I haven't received one for at least 3 years,

only a letter confirming my entitlement.

 

And I can confirm that it has happened again,

because I got my confirmation letter of my renewal in the post today,

and guess what,

no card.

 

On the other hand,

just to confuse things further,

2 days ago,

I received hubby's certificate (only about 4 months late!),

and his DID come with a card,

for the 1st time since we started having him on pre-paid,

only about 2 years ago.

 

And yes,

as Bazza posts,

the DD is supposed to automatically renew.

"so you don't have to worry about forgetting to renew".

Ah!

There's a laugh! >:(

 

My "sanctimonious" comment was simply because here at CAG,

we have tried to never have a "it's your responsibility" blanket approach when a member comes up with a query.

 

From the early days,

we have had the "it's your fault you had bank charges",

"you shouldn't have got in debt",

"you were supposed to check where you parked",

and so many other campaigns where we made the big companies back down and change their ways.

 

It's always disappointing to see the cop-out

"it's your fault, you should have checked" response,

which besides being highly unhelpful,

(it's only an opinion, not based on any legal precedent) comes across as just cutting the debate short.

 

Like I said,

I think that I have more than one legal argument up my sleeve if it comes to that:

1) the Direct Debit guarantee, which protects me against wrong amounts being taken in error, and which clearly stipulates that a DD will continue until *I* instruct the other side to stop;

 

2) the Hong-Kong/Phillips argument (not the customer's responsibility to check bank statements: whilst it is more an argument to do with banks disputes,

I think the principle itself is sound and sufficient to be used in other cases); and finally

 

3) the good faith / lack of care argument:

let's not forget that in a small claims,

the judge will decide on the *balance of probabilities* whether I intended to defraud the NHS,

or if it was down to an admin error (not mine, btw!) and that at the very least,

the NHS body should be held responsible for their failure to adhere to their own procedures.

 

As you can see, it's far from as clear cut as just a "it's your responsibility" thing.

 

On a separate note,

apologies for the harsh tone of my previous post:

that was the day Ophelia hit the UK,

and the change in pressure made me very irritable,

which I only noticed the day after when it had passed!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I for one am actually looking forward to reading the outcome of this. Please do keep us informed.


My views are my own and are not representative of any organisation. if you've found my post helpful please click on the star below.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Me too!

 

If I was a on the judgement panel, it would hinge on how the direct debit came to be cancelled.

 

I didn't think MF's comments were sanctimonious.

We are all guilty at times of blaming third-parties,

when we should be taking responsibility ourselves (I am no exception).

 

We should be able to voice our opinions,

(within certain bounds),

even if others do not like them,

as they can make us stop and assess our thoughts and actions.

 

BTW,

what is a Royalties Account Holder,

or a Gold or Platinum one for that matter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Me too!

 

If I was a on the judgement panel, it would hinge on how the direct debit came to be cancelled.

 

I have asked them... They haven't answered. It definitely wasn't me who cancelled it, that's for sure!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update, have received the letter saying that as I haven't paid or responded (?), they treat it as a refusal and have added the surcharge, etc. Ah well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Did they ever take you to court to recover the penalty? I am in a similar position to you where they have just completely ignored anything I said in my appeal and are sticking to the same line. I'm wondering whether I need to pay. I'm happy to pay what I owe, but not a penalty charge.

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

better to start a new thread

you wont get seen here its a good few months old

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi

Did they ever take you to court to recover the penalty? I am in a similar position to you where they have just completely ignored anything I said in my appeal and are sticking to the same line. I'm wondering whether I need to pay. I'm happy to pay what I owe, but not a penalty charge.

Thanks.

 

Nope.

 

I told them they would have to make their case in court, and that I would defend to the end. That was the last I heard of them.

 

:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D

 

(Sorry for late response, I only occasionally pass through these days!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?




  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if you go to the dwp website there is an online SAR you can fill in to get all the details.   here is your old thread mentioned above  
    • Thanks for the advice, I will call the council Tuesday morning and see what they say, and then send the I/E form.   Something doesn't sit right with me on the whole thing.    I found an email I had sent to my MP early 2008 detailing the problems we were having with tax credits, and I go into great detail of our situation and  employment history.   Work was sporadical and I am pretty sure we were on benefits throughout one of those whole periods (I even had a post on here about the bank charges problem)   In fact most of those time periods mentioned in post 4 there was little work. Worst 2 years of our lives! I dont know how to find records of benefits though for that long ago.
    • I won a prize in a Raffle operated by an organisation holding an event at a local venue. The prizes were displayed on video screens in the venue and on a printed list by the person selling the tickets.  The prize I won was stated as "4 (four) weekend VIP tickets to Birmingham Pride"   - I did not open the envelope until the following day - it contained 3 (three) vouchers for weekend "Premium" tickets to Birmingham Pride (Premium being a lower priced ticket than VIP).   A friend who was at the event with me had the phone number of one of the organisers - there being no other obvious way to contact them - the person confirmed the prize was stated as 4 tickets, it was supposed to have been changed to 3, but that it had not been done.   I considered that this was suspicious, I can accept it might not have been possible to change the wording on the video screens, but the person selling the tickets could have clarified this verbally, and could have altered the "4" on the printed sheet to show "3".    As "compensation" I was offered free entry to their next event. That would be £7 per person (if they intended to include anyone else I was attending with) which in no way equates in financial or entertainment value of the Pride event, which has tickets priced £88.00, for two days of live acts including Marc Almond, Faithless and Human League.   I would like to know if the offer of prizes as originally stated and the exchange of money for entry in the raffle constitutes an intent to create legal relations - and as such, that I am entitled to 4 (four) VIP tickets (not Premium) and nothing else other than a cash alternative of equal value to the expected prize.   Incidentally, the vouchers state to send an email to an email address at birminghampride.com – which I did several weeks ago, but have not received any response.   I assume even if the Pride organisers fail to respond, the raffle organiser is still liable.
    • you realise Gick its very easy to make win 10 look like win 7.? I wouldn't move from 7 because I do lots of RS232 and other basic comms stuff with vintage gear and past 7 it would not longer do what I want.   win10 put everything back and works better than 7  ive even got it on a very old 1gb ram vio pc  if you want help pm me and I can sort things for you. 
  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
    • 30 Day Right To Reject - Vehicle Casualty Report. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415585-30-day-right-to-reject-vehicle-casualty-report/
      • 57 replies
×
×
  • Create New...