Jump to content


Gemini Parking PCN claimform - Olympic Park


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1683 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

post 21 applies

 

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

they have

zero legal powers.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

rgats the idea. If you get a letter from a firm of solicitors post that up though, civil procedure has changed and new wording must be used in any letter leading to court action. The response will be of the same nature as previously but we dont want you wasting a stamp by wiritng too soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

As post 21

So now we act

 

Await eb

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well it is a half correct PAP letter, it states what si owed but doesnt say how they got to that amount and why it is owed.

Gladdys dotn like to bother themselves with the small stuff like the truth so you wont get a corrected version of this.

 

I would advise responding so there is a paper trail that shows you have acted reasonabley and by the reverse of that they have acted unreasonably when they continue.

so how to respond?

 

Dear Will and John

as you are the parking world's cleverest solicitors you will understand that your clients claim is defective because they didnt offer a contyract to the driver at the time

" the signage says permit holders or pay by phone.

 

This is not a unilateral contarct and has no mention of any monies being due to your client and doesnt carry a list of core terms for the driver to consider, let alone mention any monies being owed for breaching sucj non-existent terms.

 

I blame the idiots at the IPC for giving them such dire advice when they vet all of thei clients signage for allowing such nonsense to be placed around the site when it is just meaningless garbage.

 

As you are the most knowledgeable lawyers in this field I am sure you will tell your cleints the difference between an invitation to treat, a prohibitive sign, compelling signage and a unilateral contract and then recommend to them they stop wasting everyones time on this nonsense and get back to their day job.

Edited by dx100uk
merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

sorted for you EB^^^

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh yes!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No more likely for them to halt action,they know a defended claim is most likely to fail, and the fact you have told them so but they still carry on means they could get a spanking (again) in court.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Thanks EB, thought as much as there's not even a threat of any further action in the letter.

 

One more question for you.. we moved house recently and the mail redirection currently runs out at the end of March. Are they likely to send further letters in two months time that might need a response, ie LBA, or would that have arrived instead of this if they were going to try to pursue it further?

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

the you should write to the parking co and tell them that you ahve moved and that all future correspiondence should be sent to your new address. this doesnt imply that you ower anythiing but you are aware of the keenness of aprking co's to file claims to old addresses to obtain a default judgement

include that in your brief letter so they know that you know their game and wont be tempted to try it

Link to post
Share on other sites

or resent your letter of post 38 from the new address?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi again gents, back sooner than expected as I received this in the post yesterday. 

 

So these boys obviously believe they have a legit claim against me... or rather they hope this will intimidate me in to paying up.

 

What's the course of action from here please chaps?

 

Gemini CCClaim Form.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Respond to the Claim Form using MCOL, register an account and tick Defend all.  DX and the others will be along soon to give exact details of how to respond.  Do NOT ignore this.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...