Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since. I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
    • Ok many thanks. Just wanted to check that nothing else for us to do / send for the moment. Will update again once we receive a copy of their N181 and proposed directions for review. Our post is a bit hit and miss at the moment. Appreciate the help through this process.
    • Yes and will ask you if you are in agreement and or wish to add /remove any direction.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell/BW claimform - old Vanquis card - a case of fraud ***Claim Dismissed***


josborn
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2383 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd

 

Date of issue –

 

What is the claim for –

1.The Claimant's claim is for the amount of £800 being monies due from the Defendant to the Claimant, under a Store Cards, Credit Cards agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 between the Defendant and Vanquis Bank Plc under account reference xxxxxxx and assigned to the Claimant on 14/04/14 notice of which has been given to the Defendant.

2. The Defendant has failed to maintain the contractual payment under the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served and not complied with.

3. The claim also includes the statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum (a daily rate of £0.16p from the date of assignment of the agreement to 14/04/14 being an amount of £60).

What is the value of the claim? £950

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit card

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt collector

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? The account was opened at a different address to mine. I lived at this address about 20 years ago but have moved twice since then. I received a debt collector letter in 2013 for this and I wrote and said they have the wrong person but I did not hear a thing until March this year when I got a County Court summons.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments? I have never made any payments (neither has the person who opened this account)

 

What was the date of your last payment? None

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Yes, its not my account

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management? No

 

 

Hi,

 

I am looking for any advice that I can get. TIA.

 

I have copied the bit from the sticky and put my information in and posted it below.

I have filed the defence and done all that I can.

 

 

The case will be in court in a couple of weeks time.

I am not nervous about the court bit,

I wanted to check to see if anyone has any advice as it is a fraudulent account.

 

 

I have reported it to the police via action fraud website and told BW Legal about this, but they are not listening.

I have proof that the address the account was started out is not mine etc

but they are not responding to any of the points that I am making.

 

The main question that I have is:

the account was started by someone using my maiden name.

The account was started in 2012.

I got married in 2003.

Should I tell BW Legal that they are using my name wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowell/BWL will not be in the slightest bit interested in details such as the account being in a maiden name or a card being issued to a long-departed address. They want money - pure and simple and my guess is that this will not get near to a Court hearing once they realise that it will be a non-starter in front of a Judge

 

Have you sent a CCA request and a CPR 31.14 request for the relevant paperwork? Probably also worth sending a SAR to Vanquis

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what stage of the claim are you at - have you've exchanged witness statements yet?

what date is the hearing..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sidewinder, thank you.

 

I sent a Data Request to Lowell but they ignored it completely.

 

I sent it recorded delivery and included a £10 cheque.

 

They signed for the letter but did not cash the cheque.

 

I chased it up a month later with Lowell and BW Legal both those letters were signed for and ignored.

I have used the post receipts in my defence which I filed a couple of weeks ago.

 

BW Legal sent their witness statement saying Lowell would not be in court but their representative will be.

They also sent screenshots of the credit card application.

 

All of the information was wrong (employment, email, phone number etc).

The only slightly correct information is my old address and my maiden name.

I included a copy of my tenancy agreement in my defence as this shows that I moved into my current address before the card was applied for at my old address.

I am amazed that whoever got the card was accepted!

 

I did not report the account to Action Fraud until the start of this month, because I did not have any real information until I got the witness statement and documents from BW Legal.

 

I thought that they would drop the case after I reported it to the police, but they haven't.

I would think that this will go all the way now as they have paid the court fee.

I am just hoping the court believe me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you've filed your witness statement??

old address fraud under maiden name is extremely common

 

most go undetected and a default judgement is gained.

 

which is why DCA's file about 800'000 speculative claimforms a years

its a numbers game

 

not sure where you go the idea that an sar was the thing to do?

we've never said that here

always CCA/CPR.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

 

 

thanks.

I have filed my witness statement.

They sent theirs a couple of weeks before they were due so I managed to go through theirs to make mine as detailed as possible.

 

I only found this site recently so I had sent a Data Request because I thought that was the way to get the information.

 

What would a CCA/CPR get me?

Would it just be the application details?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well not to matter just for future readers really re: CCA/CPR

ideally your SAR should have gone to the original creditor

to prove they failed to carry out due diligence when allowing a successful application to an address you left 20yrs ago!!

 

likewise though, i'm a bit troubled that you cant have ever gotten your credit file as if this has been running since 2012

you would have spotted this in 2012 or at least since.

 

proving you were living elsewhere at the time of application is not really gonna hold much weight esp if you get judge lottery.

 

can you scan up to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF

their WS inc exhibits

and

your WS inc exhibits

 

and your defence

 

please read the UPLOAD

 

when is your hearing please too

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What would a CCA/CPR get me?

Would it just be the application details?

 

The CCA might have got an application form with a signature on (which would hopefully look nothing like yours) - although it may well have been an online application. A CPR should have supplied all documents referred to in the Particulars Of Claim including Default Notice etc.

 

How did the Claim Form end up with you? Presumably all paperwork would originally have gone to the address held on the account?

 

Are the police investigating as any goods ordered would have gone to the account address so they should be able to establish who was living there at the time?

 

I still say that this will get to a couple of days before the hearing date and you will get a Notice of Discontinuance - you may even arrive at Court to find nobody there and they have discontinued on the day. Others are much wiser than I but I think you would have grounds to apply for costs

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

 

 

I will try scanning the statements into a one page PDF and add them on.

I have looked at my credit reference files.

They don't have the debt on them

(I assume it is because it is in my maiden name which changed so long ago).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sidewinder,

 

I am not sure how they got my actual address.

 

I doubt the person who really had the card would have updated it.

 

They did not make any payments or anything, by the look of it they just used the card then ignored the bills.

 

I did hear about it in 2013 from a debt collection company (I think they were called BPO).

 

I wrote back to them questioning their letter, but when I heard no more I assumed it had been a mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BPO are lowells

they got your details from your credit file..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its a real shame the credit file system doesn't pick this type of fraud up and alert people

but simply allows it to happen but helps the DCA get backdoor CCJ's and the likes of what you are suffering.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

shame you've not mentioned its maiden name fraud at a 20yrs old address anywhere.

what address is on the DN and NOA

your current or the old one

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

 

 

I did tell them as soon as they sent me the details that it is the wrong address. I have not said it is my maiden name as I was not sure if it was the right thing to do as they are suing me in my maiden name.

 

 

The DN (is that default notice?) was to my old address and the NOA (notice of allocation of the sale of debt?) was to my old address too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then it appears to me their WS is wrong as they say the DN and NOA was posted to the address you've used in your defence / WS?

 

 

I will assume the claimform was served to your current address too and all they've done is used your maiden name

so they know something is up

what address was on the copy of the supposed agreement? your old address?

 

 

so someones trying to pull the wool here and its not you.

 

 

did your WS exhibits include all the documents you've sent them since day one

so essentially covers the fraud issue as its mentioned in those letters that they chose to ignore?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

 

 

yes the courts claimform came to my current address.

Everything is in my maiden name (they have not used my married name on anything).

 

 

I attached absolutely everything to my witness statement.

All of the letters that I have sent, including the one to BPO in 2013 and the ones to Lowell and BW Legal since they started the claim.

 

 

I have even attached the post receipts to prove that I sent them the letters.

They are saying that I have not contacted them so I wanted the court to see they are lying about that too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Josborn

 

I have read their WS - They really are a nasty piece of work BW Legal - In the last 8 months i have had 2 run ins with them myself - Not legal proceedings like you but in the forms of complaints etc

I recieved a response back along the lines of the below;

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]69141[/ATTACH]

 

The reason why i tell you this is because then you can see just how bad they can be. You have shown in your Witness Statement that you have made regular contact with them and they have ignored it. Their WS is just really nasty.

 

You are in good hands with DX and i cant see this going far at all. I believe DX is right and they are having you on.

 

Keep strong and dont let them wear you down :)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might not have gone about this the correct way and have ended up making it more complicated, but you have provided enough information in defending your claim, to hopefully ensure Lowell withdraw it.

 

I can't see the point in any court hearing.

But then in another similar case to yours they did proceed and stupidly the defendant did not attend the hearing so lost by default.

 

Lowells/BW Legal often don't bother responding to correspondence and i believe Lowell got reprimanded by regulators a few years ago about this. My experience in dealing with a relatives debt, is that they admitted not responding to letters and said they just filed them away. They paid compensation and wrote off any debts.

 

Had you contacted Vanquis the first time you had any idea of a fraudulent credit account being taken out in your name, you could have resolved this. There would have been a process including reporting it to Action Fraud, where the matter could have been subject to investigation.

 

It is always the original creditor that is responsible for allowing the fraud.

Debt Collection Agencies just chase debts from a spreadsheet and know very little, trying to blag a profit.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Fliko, what they wrote to you is horrible.

I hope you managed to take your complaint to a regulator or ombudsman

(I don't know which).

 

 

Hi Uncle, I am a fool for not contacting Vanquis.

I thought there had been a mistake when I wrote back to BPO in 2013 and when they didn't reply I thought they had realised it was a mistake and didn't do anything else.

 

The next debt collector letter that I received was from BW Legal to say that they had already started the court action

(their letter came a couple of days after the court one,

it was dated the same day as the court action)

 

. By then I didn't contact Vanquis because it was Lowell who were suing me.

 

I have contacted action fraud and reported it.

I got a confirmation email

I am waiting to hear anymore from them.

It was only a couple of weeks ago.

 

 

BW Legal have paid the court fee so I guess it is definitely going to trial.

Its the week after next.

 

They paid the fee before they sent their witness statement,

which is the first time I actually got any real information from them.

 

If they had given me more before this I could have contacted action fraud sooner or worked with Lowell in mediation.

Its so frustrating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When is the hearing please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good week away now I can see me screen better sorry

Await andyorch to pop in

Plenty of time for that

And to sort things

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...