Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, just to close this one, please see the photos below....before and after    Thank you, all, for some great advice (as per usual!)
    • Thanks BankFodder.   I wasn't intending on making bones about it with them but I was irked at being dismissed with the phrase 'it's store policy'.  I returned it because I was returning an air hockey game which wasn't functioning properly.  I would have assumed that if it were designed as a toy for an audience that may be prone to dropping it, it would be made to be suitably durable.  I was expecting that a year would have been reasonable and by it not lasting it was, as you mentioned, not of satisfactory quality. Alas, it's not something I wish to pursue to find out for sure.   I do appreciate your feedback, as always on here, I like to know where I stand with these things.  Thanks also for the heads-up on the Youtube video, I had not thought of that.
    • I've also being doing some reading over the weekend. It appears the law of properties act 1925 does not apply in Scotland (only England and Wales).   "In Scotland an assignation need not be in writing, and intimation is all that is needed to give the assignee a right effective against all parties. Apart from the terminology, the principal differences in England are as follows. Under the Law of Property Act 1925 the assignment must be in writing, the entire benefit must be assigned, and notice must be given to the other contracting party. If any of these elements are missing there may still be an equitable assignment – under which an assignee would typically need to join the assignor as a party to any action under the contract."   So I think the NOA defence is not going to hold up, as Nolans are probably right in what they are saying that their letter (intimation) is sufficient.   So my sole defence is going to be lack of default notice under section 87/88.   Any advice at this stage? I assume costs are still capped at £150 if lose?
    • Hi bankfodder. I do have the invoice in my email, so would it be the cost of the turbo and labour for fitting
    • as i said unsure of what this 15% is about.   the FOS/FCA clearly describe how refund calcs show have been made the their relevant sites.   p'haps at this juncture it might be better to scan up to ONE multipage PDF their refund letters  another set of eyes is always belter.   please read our upload guide carefully      
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Britannia Parking ANPR PCN - Costas Lydiards Field Swindon


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1082 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

1 Date of the infringement - 06 Sept 17

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 25th Sept 17

 

3 Date received 28th Sept 17

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?] No

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes (picture of my car but can't see timestamps)

 

6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up you appeal] No

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A

 

7 Who is the parking company? Britannia Parking

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Swindon - Lydiards FieldHi,

 

I have today received a parking charge notice (details above).

 

1) I did not see any signage - however, I found another thread where someone has posted the signs

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?476866-Britannia-parking-ANPR-PCN-Lydiard-Fields-Swindon&p=5065611#post5065611

 

I'm from out of the area and was looking for somewhere to grab a coffee and do a bit of work - saw a Costa so parked there.

 

2) according to the sign in the other thread its a 1 hour limit and I was there for 2hrs 19 mins

- which is possible as I was in Costa and had my laptop and did a bit of work.

 

3) I notice the notice was 25th Sept and the offence on the 6th Sept

- so 19 days (outside of the 14 days).

Does this mean its unenforceable?

 

I'm really just after some advice

- yes I didn't notice the sign at the entrance and am a bit stupid I was navigating somewhere new and checking where I was going.

I didn't see a sign where I parked.

 

It's £60 if I pay in the next 14 days and £100 otherwise.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep out of time

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

wouldn't think so

 

let Eric advise though before you do anything further...

 

poss DVLA complaint or gather stuff to hit them with or their minions ...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no, you dont appeal,

you let them waste time and money sending you more stupid letters

and then tell them they havent followed the protocols when it looks like they might be tempted to try their luck because you havent responded.

 

 

As it stands you are in a position where you can sue them for breach of the DPA so let them carry on for the moment.

 

 

How far this all goes depends on you attitude to this,

showing them you are up for a fight later will usually be enough to make them skulk away

but respond too soon they will think they have you worried, whatever you say.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been looking but is there a sticky which explains this 14 day rule

- are you saying that because of that they have breached the Data Protection Act (by getting my details outside of 14 days)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

read the POFA,

it has all of the required steps for a parking co to issue a ticket/NTK.

If they dont slap a ticket on the car they must have some sort of photographic evidence of the event.

 

This has to be sent with the NTK within 14 days after the date of the event or no keeper liability can be created.

If they ask for the keeper details after 12 days then they cannot be compliant with the POFA so they have no lawful reason to obtain them and by doing so they have broken the agreement they signed to get access to the DVLA database.

 

It is the not telling the truth on this access that causes the breach of the DPA as they are then unlawfully processing the data.

 

Late NTK?

no keeper liability and breach of DPA so cant claim from keeper

(even if they suspect the driver is the same person, they have to prove it)

and you can sue them for the unlawful processing of data causing you distress etc.

 

 

There are precedents for this so not a difficult thing to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

ignore a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF.

 

you never ever RING anyone!!

nor email.

 

as post 5

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously I want this to go away and now I'm getting letters from a Debt Recovery Agency it's got me a bit worried. I've found a template for a letter on another site would this be good to send to Britannia Parking or do I need to write to the DRA as well?

 

I am writing to you to lodge a formal appeal against a parking charge notice sent to myself as registered keeper of the vehicle in question. I was NOT the driver.

 

I contend that I am not liable for this parking charge on the basis of the below points:

 

 

This Notice to Keeper (NTK) is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (POFA) due to the dates and the wording used.

 

Under schedule 4, paragraph 4 of the POFA, an operator can only establish the right to recover any unpaid parking charges from the keeper of a vehicle if certain conditions are met, as stated in paragraphs 5, 6, 11 & 12. ParkingEye have failed to fulfil the conditions which state that the keeper must be served with a compliant NTK in accordance with paragraph 9, which stipulates a mandatory timeline and wording:-

 

’’The notice must be given by— (a) handing it to the keeper, or leaving it at a current address for service for the keeper, within the relevant period; or

(b) sending it by post to a current address for service for the keeper so that it is delivered to that address within the relevant period.’’

The applicable section here is (b) because the NTK was delivered by post. Furthermore, paragraph 9(5) states: ’’The relevant period…is the period of 14 days beginning with the day after that on which the specified period of parking ended’’

 

The NTK sent to myself as Registered Keeper was issued on 25/09/2017, when the actual date of event is recorded as , a difference of 18 DAYS. Even if they had posted it on the same day that they describe as the ‘Date Issued’, it would be impossible for the notice to have been actually delivered and deemed ‘served’ or given, within the 'relevant period' as required under paragraph 9(4)(b).

Link to post
Share on other sites

as post 9 what part of ignore do you not understand

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
as post 9 what part of ignore do you not understand

 

As you'll notice the word ignore in your post is highlighted and when you look at it - it says....

 

If you are considering ignoring a letter from a private parking company demanding money for some alleged parking incident - you should understand that this is not the best course of action

 

Perhaps you can understand how a newbie might be confused by the advice given?

 

Going back to post #5 from Erics Brother

 

How far this all goes depends on you attitude to this,

showing them you are up for a fight later will usually be enough to make them skulk away

but respond too soon they will think they have you worried, whatever you say.

 

It's slightly ambiguous as to when is a good time to put up a fight - I've now received a letter from Debt Recovery Plus which says if I don't pay by the 15th - they will recommend court action is taken by the client.

 

Ok I realise that may be scare tactics but as a newbie I'm just trying to ascertain when is a good time and at what point do I respond. Will Britannia contact me after the 15th again or will they try baliffs/court or whatever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cant do anything to you ignore the DCA!!

they cannot send bailiffs its not even been in court!

 

the parking company must send a letter before claim and abide by the PAP rules.

 

not being funny

but unless you have done so off line

you've not read any other threads here at all

 

CAG is self help too.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But there is a huge difference between Britannia Parking and Debt Recovery Plus.

 

Britannia Parking claim you owe them money and might take you to court, although you are a hell of a long way from that at the moment, and their case would be pretty useless given their NTK is out of time.

 

Debt Recovery Plus are just a bunch of oaves who send scary letters, they have no power to do anything, they are paper tigers. Even if the debt exists, it's not theirs. That's why the advice is to ignore them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

you say you are a newbie,

does that mean you havent read up on any other threads about either the wiles of the parking co's or about the letters dca's send out.

 

The nickname threatogram should tell you enough

 

but if not remember this NO dca OWNS THE DEBT,

THEY HAVE NO POWERS OR RIGHTS TO DEMAND ANYTHING OR TO TAKE ANY ACTION OTHER THAN WRITING LETTERS.

Link to post
Share on other sites
you say you area newebie, does that mean you havent read up on any toehr threads about either the wiles of the parking co's or about the lette4rs dca's send out. The nickname threatogram should tell you enough but if not remember this NO dca OWNS THE DEBT, THEY HAVE NO POWERS OR RIGHTS TO DEMAND ANYTHING OR TO TAKE ANY ACTION OTHER THAN WRITING LETTERS.

 

Yep I now appreciate the DRP letter is just a threat but I've searched, read various threads and trying to work out when I write to Britannia and ask them to cease and desist as they have not abided by the POFA. I also read on another thread/forum that the 28 days they say I have to appeal, although now passed, is not cast in stone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it means NOTHING

 

you never ever reply to a DCA on anything even consumer debt

they are totally powerless and ARE NOT BAILIFFS

 

the only thing you do nOT ignore

is a claimform from northants Bulk

 

or a Letter before claim

issued by a SOLICITOR

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

in reality you are not going to write to Britannia to tell them to cease and desist because they claim you owe money so they can keep writing to you. law says so.

 

Again, you are not appealing so any timescale irrelevant.

 

The wording of the POFA is a but vague on a couple of points and this is one of them.

 

In short, you hope thay give up and go away but if they do decide to take legal action they have to follow procedures and then you tell them what is what and point out that being vexatious or unreasonable can mean you get costs of £1500 or so awarded for their trouble.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...