Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2407 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I really need some help.

 

Back in May I got an enforcement notice for unpaid Council Tax of £949.70 from Newlyn

 

I rang them up and agreed to pay £125 a month.

I paid June and July and I rang August to be told that I'd already paid and to call in middle of Sept.

 

Today I had a visit from a bailiff whilst I was out saying they came to remove goods and also added £235.

 

 

I can pay £125 but I feel I've been conned.

I work

Link to post
Share on other sites

You had an excellent payment arrangement agreed (most arrangements are usually over a period of approx) and its a shame that it has ceased.

 

When Newlyn informed you in August that they had supposedly received a payment from you for that month did you query the comment?

 

You must telephone Newlyn in the morning to make enquiries about your conversation last month. Please post back once you have done so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really need some help.

 

Back in May I got an enforcement notice for unpaid Council Tax of £949.70 from Newlyn

 

I rang them up and agreed to pay £125 a month.

I paid June and July and I rang August to be told that I'd already paid and to call in middle of Sept.

 

Today I had a visit from a bailiff whilst I was out saying they came to remove goods and also added £235.

 

Any news?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have text the number on the notice of removal as he wasn't answering. He did reply though saying that that in 'August you was advised of your payment date. As such additional fees are warranted given you last payment before action was on 14/7/17'

 

When I questioned this he said

 

'As I have said the fees are warranted. An fee free to contact the council. As I have explained we have done nothing wrong. You have not made your payments as such it is warranted'.

 

I then pressed about my mental health condition and he replied

 

'Can you please provide proof of any medical issues you wish to be taken into account. And I have not made a comment on the call as I was not on it. But this is your dent as such your responsibility to make payments.'

 

I have since made Aug and Sept payment and sent in lettres from hospital. mental health practitioner and photo of my meds with my name on.

 

He also said there may be a fee to listen to call.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I have since made Aug and Sept payment and sent in lettres from hospital. mental health practitioner and photo of my meds with my name on.

 

He also said there may be a fee to listen to call.

 

There is NO fee for listening back at a recorded call !!

 

As you have now made payment for August and September and provided evidence in support of your vulnerability, it is a matter of waiting for a response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I've had a response from Newlyn.

They still want their money.

Not interested in the medical evidence.

Not interested in providing a call.

 

 

Sadly they appear unanswerable to anybody.

I've now emailed my Council to advise them.

In the meantime just had another intimidating text.....................

.we're coming round to take possessions.

Furious. ill, anxious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I empathize with you but just because you have mental health issues does not mean your vulnerable.

However take the issue up with the council. They may have a more sympathetic ear and take the debt back.

You have to remember that all enforcement company's hear the I'm vulnerable excuse 100 times a day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I've had a response from Newlyn.

They still want their money.

Not interested in the medical evidence.

Not interested in providing a call.

 

Sadly they appear unanswerable to anybody.

I've now emailed my Council to advise them.

In the meantime just had another intimidating text.....................

.we're coming round to take possessions.

Furious. ill, anxious.

 

they cant ignore them.

 

they've not gained peaceful entry

nor have made a list of goods before hand

so willy waving.

 

you need to read CTAX bailiff threads

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I've had a response from Newlyn.

They still want their money.

Not interested in the medical evidence.

Not interested in providing a call.

 

There must be a lot more background information about this matter that you have not told us about. I refer. specifically to the speedy reply that you have received from Newlyn.

 

I say this because; in the many thousands of enquiries that I have assisted with since the new regulations were introduced in 2014, I have yet to come across a case where an enforcement agency would respond to correspondence within just one day and more importantly, would reject evidence in support of mental health difficulties in the same period.

 

All enforcement companies are aware of the need to be cautious with cases where there is any evidence of vulnerability (I stress the word 'evidence') and even more so, where that vulnerability is of of mental health. I notice that you are working, but what evidence did you send to Newlyn in support of your mental health difficulties?

 

Also when did you send the evidence to them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was going to post the full conversation but it's proving difficult.

The reason for the quick replies is because it's the bailiffs phone by text.

Emails have gone to council and the bailiffs head office.

845.png

Edited by stebiz
cant upload
Link to post
Share on other sites

Stebiz,

 

From what you have shown above it would seem that you have been exchanging text messages with the individual bailiff. His role is to 'take control of goods'. You really must write to Newlyn (email is fine) and start your letter by referring to the telephone call that you had in August and their advice to you that you had already made payment for that particular month and that a further payment was not due until September.

 

Next, you will need to outline any 'vulnerability' and provide some evidence in support. The evidence can consist of a letter from your doctor etc, and details of medication. For speed, you can send a picture of prescribed medication showing your name and dosage etc. State that further evidence can be provided) if necessary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did send attachments of photos of medicine, hospital and my mental health specialist letter. It was ignored by baillif. Not holding my breath waiting for a reply by Newlyn themselves although an email was sent. In the meantime the texts continue.

 

I did honestly call in August. At the time I was in and out of hospital and I genuinely thought I'd paid it and was just confused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did send attachments of photos of medicine, hospital and my mental health specialist letter. It was ignored by baillif. Not holding my breath waiting for a reply by Newlyn themselves although an email was sent. In the meantime the texts continue.

 

I did honestly call in August. At the time I was in and out of hospital and I genuinely thought I'd paid it and was just confused.

 

Your evidence should not have been ignored by the individual bailiff and hopefully, Newlyn will tackle this point with him when THEY address your correspondence.

 

I would suggest that you STOP sending text messages to the individual enforcement agent right now. Concentrate instead on writing to Newlyn. It may be a good idea to also speak with the council. They are wholly responsible for the debt and how it is enforced so they can.....and should intervene.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...