Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2408 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I purchased a Leasehold property on 30 Oct 2014.

 

Since then I have had no demand for ground rent until this morning.

 

I have received 13 x 6 monthly demands for ground rent dating back to July 2011 totalling £975.00.

 

 

All of the demands are stating that payment is due on 7 October 2017 so there is no suggestion that previous demands have been sent.

 

I have yet to discuss this with the solicitor who undertook the conveyancing.

 

Can anyone tell me the legal position with this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to CAG Marktw

 

 

https://www.gov.uk/leasehold-property/service-charges-and-other-expenses

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your replies.

 

The Lease states that the ground rent is yearly from January to December the sum of £150.

 

Ground rent is therefore £75 for each 6 month period.

 

I have received 13 demands for £75 dating back to 1 Jul 2011 and all state that I am required to make payment on 7th October 2017.

 

None are dated but statement is dated 7th September 2017. The statement lists the 13 demands of £75 for each period.

 

For example the first demand is worded as follows:

 

This notice requires you to pay rent of £75 on 7th Oct 2017.

 

This rent is payable in respect of the period 1 Jul 2011 to 31 Dec 2011

 

In accordance with the terms of your lease the amount of £75 was due on 1 Jul 2011.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This seems legit, they can claim 6 years worth (in line with stat limits legislation), it sounds as if the demands are in order, Id simply pay up as if you dont you maybe liable for further sums as they total more than £350, the right to forfeit kicks in.

 

Normally FHs would send a GR demand each year and its a bit odd to save up 6 years worth but its legal.

 

Normally your conveyancer would check that there are no outstanding sums (such as 2011 - 2014) so someone is at fault here.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, in any other business if you forget to invoice a customer you lose the cash. The law is outrageous that you are liable for ground rent before the property was purchased. I can feel a letter to my MP coming on!

 

Certainly I will take up the matter with the solicitor.

 

many thanks for your reply Andy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are not liable for GR before the property was built, but the Law allows last 6 years due to be duly invoiced. To advise further, you would need to copy & paste the redacted invoice exactly as received.

 

GR and service charge debts stay with the property not the person, that is why solicitor/conveyancers have to make sure there are no outstanding amounts before the new person buy the property..coz if there are he effectively takes on the debt too.

 

MPs are well aware of the unfairness and change in leasehold has been a long time coming, Ive been to court umpteen times against my FH but mostly won :)

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep, if your solicitor has failed to find out about this then theymay well be footing the bill but that will depend on wheat their standard conveyancing work involves and what instructions you gave them. If you have the address of the person who sold you the property you may ahve a case for recovering the monies due to misrepresntation of thier position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I sold my Fathers home my Conveyancer simply adjusted the purchase price for the GR outstanding for the previous years unpaid dues up until the exchange date.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Often ground rent is relatively low (under £100) so 6 years worth would at most be a few hundred, service charges are more important as there could be major works costing many thousands that havnt been paid for that the new owners suddenly finds himself liable for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This seems legit, they can claim 6 years worth (in line with stat limits legislation), it sounds as if the demands are in order, Id simply pay up as if you dont you maybe liable for further sums as they total more than £350, the right to forfeit kicks in.

 

Normally FHs would send a GR demand each year and its a bit odd to save up 6 years worth but its legal.

 

Normally your conveyancer would check that there are no outstanding sums (such as 2011 - 2014) so someone is at fault here.

 

Andy

 

As they have gone back exactly 6 years I wouldn't be surprised if they'd actually failed to invoice GR for much longer than that and only now realised their error and gone back the maximum they can. A friend of mine bought a flat where the freeholder hadn't collected the GR for years and years and couldn't be traced so conveyancer couldn't get the usual confirmation the GR was paid up to date. Original freeholder on lease was a private individual who had died over 20 years ago and whoever in his family had inherited it had never identified themself to the leaseholders and never asked for GR. Not sure the legal position in that case or how it was resolved. The servcie charges seemed to have been sorted out though, don't know how.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my case it turns out I had been overpaying GR and I was able to go back 12 years using the "fraud, concealment or mistake" clause of Limitations Act law and get all my overpayments back plus 8% interest which came to a nice tidy sum, my FH did not look a happy bunny in court (although why he chose to fight it is a mystery).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...