Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

In court soon regarding Benefit fraud


sakwer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2402 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I am to appear in court for the housing benefit fraud charges.

 

I claimed housing benefits back in October 2014 while i was working part time.

i became full-time university student in September 2014.

 

when i made claim for housing benefits online,

I mentioned that i am not full-time student.

then benefits started and I ended my part-time job.

 

Housing Benefits never stopped until july 2016 when i was interviewed under caution for benefit fraud.

 

total amount for the housing benefits came up to around £4800.

 

I have completed my degree in may 2017 now i am looking for graduate role.

 

I am very scared and depressed knowing that i had committed fraud.

 

If I plead guilty would I be sent to prison?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

Here's a link to the government website about Legal Aid.

 

https://www.gov.uk/check-legal-aid

 

Have you talked to anyone about this like the CAB or a local community law centre?

 

I'll send a couple of SOSs for you and see if a couple of forum regulars can get here.

 

HB

Edited by honeybee13

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not my area of knowledge, but for those with knowledge to help, more information is needed.

 

Did you deliberately provide any false information regarding your benefit claim ? Or was it simply the case that you did not advise of your change in circumstances ?

 

Can you provide more information on the history of this claim. At what point did you stop being eligible for the claim and why were you no longer eligible ?

 

Were you interviewed under caution about this housing benefit claim and accused of fraudulently claiming ? How did the council become aware of this possible fraud ? Have you obtained a full copy of the interview transcript from the council ?

 

If you are going to Magistrates next week, you need to see a local Solicitors in the next few days. Ideally it needs to be a Solicitors that deals with such issues.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

I am to appear in court for the housing benefit fraud charges.

 

I claimed housing benefits back in October 2014 while i was working part time.

i became full-time university student in September 2014.

 

when i made claim for housing benefits online,

I mentioned that i am not full-time student.

then benefits started and I ended my part-time job.

 

Housing Benefits never stopped until july 2016 when i was interviewed under caution for benefit fraud.

 

total amount for the housing benefits came up to around £4800.

 

I have completed my degree in may 2017 now i am looking for graduate role.

 

I am very scared and depressed knowing that i had committed fraud.

 

If I plead guilty would I be sent to prison?

 

Not sure what advice to give here.

 

You became a student prior to part time work and you claimed HB after you became a student and whilst working part time and you declared at the time of the claim you weren't a Student?

 

If so then it will be a false from outset case as you made a false statement/declaration.

 

Did you admit the offence at the IUC i.e. the earliest opportunity as this will go in your favour at court and when looking at what sentence to offer?

 

The chances of prison are very slim, especially for £4,800. Likely be a conditional discharge, a fine or a fine and a community order, but it all depends on the judge and how you plead versus the evidence.

 

If you go not guilty you may end up with a worse sentence as from the post it appears you made false statements to obtain the benefit.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not leave it more than a few days before getting legal advice locally, as your advisor might need to do some work before the hearing.

 

If you are struggling to cope with this e.g anxiety, depression, then try to book an urgent appointment with a Doctor to see what help they can provide.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what advice to give here.

 

You became a student prior to part time work and you claimed HB after you became a student and whilst working part time and you declared at the time of the claim you weren't a Student?

 

If so then it will be a false from outset case as you made a false statement/declaration.

 

Did you admit the offence at the IUC i.e. the earliest opportunity as this will go in your favour at court and when looking at what sentence to offer?

 

The chances of prison are very slim, especially for £4,800. Likely be a conditional discharge, a fine or a fine and a community order, but it all depends on the judge and how you plead versus the evidence.

 

If you go not guilty you may end up with a worse sentence as from the post it appears you made false statements to obtain the benefit.

 

No unfortunately I did not admit the offence at the IUC. As I was very scared of telling them the truth. However, immediately after receiving the letter from DWP for the IUC I told Council that I am full-time student then council had stopped my benefits and asked me to return every single penny they had paid me in HB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No unfortunately I did not admit the offence at the IUC. As I was very scared of telling them the truth. However, immediately after receiving the letter from DWP for the IUC I told Council that I am full-time student then council had stopped my benefits and asked me to return every single penny they had paid me in HB.

 

You need to get legal advice then. Some places offer 30 mins free or speak with the duty solicitor at court if they have one on the day, but ideally you need to decide what you want to plead before the court date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No unfortunately I did not admit the offence at the IUC. As I was very scared of telling them the truth. However, immediately after receiving the letter from DWP for the IUC I told Council that I am full-time student then council had stopped my benefits and asked me to return every single penny they had paid me in HB.

 

From what little you have said, you don't seem to understand the benefit process and what the requirements are to be entitled to receive a benefit. I.e you never intended to set out to deliberately give false information. Then later on you found out that you did not qualify for the benefit and did not know what to do.

 

Although you come across as intelligent, i wonder whether English is your first language and you have failed to understand some of the information advised to you.

 

When you obtain legal advice you must be totally honest with the person you speak to. If they are going to represent you, then they must have all the correct information.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what little you have said, you don't seem to understand the benefit process and what the requirements are to be entitled to receive a benefit. I.e you never intended to set out to deliberately give false information. Then later on you found out that you did not qualify for the benefit and did not know what to do.

 

Although you come across as intelligent, i wonder whether English is your first language and you have failed to understand some of the information advised to you.

 

When you obtain legal advice you must be totally honest with the person you speak to. If they are going to represent you, then they must have all the correct information.

 

I would disagree, OP was a full time student at the time they made the claim, question asked on claim form "are you a full time student" answer "no I am not".

 

It's a straight forward question that they gave a false answer too. How you could answer no to a straightforward answer I cannot see how you could argue ignorance.

 

It's just like the one that asks if you are working and people answer no and then say well I was only doing 20 hours a week didn't think it mattered as it's not full time. The question is normally worded along the lines of "are you doing any paid or unpaid work?".

 

The forms and questions are quite specifically worded so that false/wrong information can only be given deliberately i.e. they only require a yes or no answer which you as the person filling it in would know if it was correct at the time they answered the question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would disagree, OP was a full time student at the time they made the claim, question asked on claim form "are you a full time student" answer "no I am not".

 

It's a straight forward question that they gave a false answer too. How you could answer no to a straightforward answer I cannot see how you could argue ignorance.

.

 

What confused me is the OP saying they worked part time and entered into full time education around the same time.

 

I just raised the question as to whether they knowlingly gave false information to gain a benefit, they would not have qualified for otherwise.

 

Just trying not to make any assumptions as to what the OP originally intended. They might have made a mistake without fully realising that their actions would be considered benefit fraud.

 

Whoever they approach for legal advice needs to be told 100% the truth, so they know best way to proceed in court.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What confused me is the OP saying they worked part time and entered into full-time education around the same time.

 

I just raised the question as to whether they knowingly gave false information to gain a benefit, they would not have qualified for otherwise.

 

Just trying not to make any assumptions as to what the OP originally intended. They might have made a mistake without fully realising that their actions would be considered benefit fraud.

 

Whoever they approach for legal advice needs to be told 100% the truth, so they know the best way to proceed in court.

 

Yes, I unfortunately knowingly said 'NO' to the question if I was a student at that time because I was financially struggling to cope with rent and everything else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I checked if I could get Legal aid, I do not qualify for legal aid. I'll ask duty solicitor on the day of hearing if I could get any help. No, I did not talk to CAB yet but I am trying to arrange an appointment with local community law centre.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What confused me is the OP saying they worked part time and entered into full time education around the same time.

 

I just raised the question as to whether they knowlingly gave false information to gain a benefit, they would not have qualified for otherwise.

 

Just trying not to make any assumptions as to what the OP originally intended. They might have made a mistake without fully realising that their actions would be considered benefit fraud.

 

Whoever they approach for legal advice needs to be told 100% the truth, so they know best way to proceed in court.

 

Yes, unfortunately, I knowingly gave false information to gain benefit. as I was struggling financially.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, unfortunately, I knowingly gave false information to gain benefit. as I was struggling financially.

 

That is not good then and you should have admitted it when you had the meeting with the council.

 

If you are still attending university, if you have access to student union or other body that helps students with issues, perhaps they have a legal rep they use. I doubt you are the only student to have done this.

 

I would guess you admit guilt and fully explain your mitigating circumstances that drove you to do this. A local Solicitors might know what you are likely to face. E.g community order.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is not good then and you should have admitted it when you had the meeting with the council.

 

If you are still attending university, if you have access to student union or other body that helps students with issues, perhaps they have a legal rep they use. I doubt you are the only student to have done this.

 

I would guess you admit guilt and fully explain your mitigating circumstances that drove you to do this. A local Solicitors might know what you are likely to face. E.g community order.

 

Thank you so much for your advice.

Also, I do not hold British citizenship but I have Indefinite Leave to Remain. In future when I apply for Nationality would I be rejected by Home office because I committed fraud?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...