Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since. I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
    • Ok many thanks. Just wanted to check that nothing else for us to do / send for the moment. Will update again once we receive a copy of their N181 and proposed directions for review. Our post is a bit hit and miss at the moment. Appreciate the help through this process.
    • Yes and will ask you if you are in agreement and or wish to add /remove any direction.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

In court soon regarding Benefit fraud


sakwer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2401 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I am to appear in court for the housing benefit fraud charges.

 

I claimed housing benefits back in October 2014 while i was working part time.

i became full-time university student in September 2014.

 

when i made claim for housing benefits online,

I mentioned that i am not full-time student.

then benefits started and I ended my part-time job.

 

Housing Benefits never stopped until july 2016 when i was interviewed under caution for benefit fraud.

 

total amount for the housing benefits came up to around £4800.

 

I have completed my degree in may 2017 now i am looking for graduate role.

 

I am very scared and depressed knowing that i had committed fraud.

 

If I plead guilty would I be sent to prison?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

Here's a link to the government website about Legal Aid.

 

https://www.gov.uk/check-legal-aid

 

Have you talked to anyone about this like the CAB or a local community law centre?

 

I'll send a couple of SOSs for you and see if a couple of forum regulars can get here.

 

HB

Edited by honeybee13

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not my area of knowledge, but for those with knowledge to help, more information is needed.

 

Did you deliberately provide any false information regarding your benefit claim ? Or was it simply the case that you did not advise of your change in circumstances ?

 

Can you provide more information on the history of this claim. At what point did you stop being eligible for the claim and why were you no longer eligible ?

 

Were you interviewed under caution about this housing benefit claim and accused of fraudulently claiming ? How did the council become aware of this possible fraud ? Have you obtained a full copy of the interview transcript from the council ?

 

If you are going to Magistrates next week, you need to see a local Solicitors in the next few days. Ideally it needs to be a Solicitors that deals with such issues.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

I am to appear in court for the housing benefit fraud charges.

 

I claimed housing benefits back in October 2014 while i was working part time.

i became full-time university student in September 2014.

 

when i made claim for housing benefits online,

I mentioned that i am not full-time student.

then benefits started and I ended my part-time job.

 

Housing Benefits never stopped until july 2016 when i was interviewed under caution for benefit fraud.

 

total amount for the housing benefits came up to around £4800.

 

I have completed my degree in may 2017 now i am looking for graduate role.

 

I am very scared and depressed knowing that i had committed fraud.

 

If I plead guilty would I be sent to prison?

 

Not sure what advice to give here.

 

You became a student prior to part time work and you claimed HB after you became a student and whilst working part time and you declared at the time of the claim you weren't a Student?

 

If so then it will be a false from outset case as you made a false statement/declaration.

 

Did you admit the offence at the IUC i.e. the earliest opportunity as this will go in your favour at court and when looking at what sentence to offer?

 

The chances of prison are very slim, especially for £4,800. Likely be a conditional discharge, a fine or a fine and a community order, but it all depends on the judge and how you plead versus the evidence.

 

If you go not guilty you may end up with a worse sentence as from the post it appears you made false statements to obtain the benefit.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not leave it more than a few days before getting legal advice locally, as your advisor might need to do some work before the hearing.

 

If you are struggling to cope with this e.g anxiety, depression, then try to book an urgent appointment with a Doctor to see what help they can provide.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what advice to give here.

 

You became a student prior to part time work and you claimed HB after you became a student and whilst working part time and you declared at the time of the claim you weren't a Student?

 

If so then it will be a false from outset case as you made a false statement/declaration.

 

Did you admit the offence at the IUC i.e. the earliest opportunity as this will go in your favour at court and when looking at what sentence to offer?

 

The chances of prison are very slim, especially for £4,800. Likely be a conditional discharge, a fine or a fine and a community order, but it all depends on the judge and how you plead versus the evidence.

 

If you go not guilty you may end up with a worse sentence as from the post it appears you made false statements to obtain the benefit.

 

No unfortunately I did not admit the offence at the IUC. As I was very scared of telling them the truth. However, immediately after receiving the letter from DWP for the IUC I told Council that I am full-time student then council had stopped my benefits and asked me to return every single penny they had paid me in HB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No unfortunately I did not admit the offence at the IUC. As I was very scared of telling them the truth. However, immediately after receiving the letter from DWP for the IUC I told Council that I am full-time student then council had stopped my benefits and asked me to return every single penny they had paid me in HB.

 

You need to get legal advice then. Some places offer 30 mins free or speak with the duty solicitor at court if they have one on the day, but ideally you need to decide what you want to plead before the court date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No unfortunately I did not admit the offence at the IUC. As I was very scared of telling them the truth. However, immediately after receiving the letter from DWP for the IUC I told Council that I am full-time student then council had stopped my benefits and asked me to return every single penny they had paid me in HB.

 

From what little you have said, you don't seem to understand the benefit process and what the requirements are to be entitled to receive a benefit. I.e you never intended to set out to deliberately give false information. Then later on you found out that you did not qualify for the benefit and did not know what to do.

 

Although you come across as intelligent, i wonder whether English is your first language and you have failed to understand some of the information advised to you.

 

When you obtain legal advice you must be totally honest with the person you speak to. If they are going to represent you, then they must have all the correct information.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what little you have said, you don't seem to understand the benefit process and what the requirements are to be entitled to receive a benefit. I.e you never intended to set out to deliberately give false information. Then later on you found out that you did not qualify for the benefit and did not know what to do.

 

Although you come across as intelligent, i wonder whether English is your first language and you have failed to understand some of the information advised to you.

 

When you obtain legal advice you must be totally honest with the person you speak to. If they are going to represent you, then they must have all the correct information.

 

I would disagree, OP was a full time student at the time they made the claim, question asked on claim form "are you a full time student" answer "no I am not".

 

It's a straight forward question that they gave a false answer too. How you could answer no to a straightforward answer I cannot see how you could argue ignorance.

 

It's just like the one that asks if you are working and people answer no and then say well I was only doing 20 hours a week didn't think it mattered as it's not full time. The question is normally worded along the lines of "are you doing any paid or unpaid work?".

 

The forms and questions are quite specifically worded so that false/wrong information can only be given deliberately i.e. they only require a yes or no answer which you as the person filling it in would know if it was correct at the time they answered the question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would disagree, OP was a full time student at the time they made the claim, question asked on claim form "are you a full time student" answer "no I am not".

 

It's a straight forward question that they gave a false answer too. How you could answer no to a straightforward answer I cannot see how you could argue ignorance.

.

 

What confused me is the OP saying they worked part time and entered into full time education around the same time.

 

I just raised the question as to whether they knowlingly gave false information to gain a benefit, they would not have qualified for otherwise.

 

Just trying not to make any assumptions as to what the OP originally intended. They might have made a mistake without fully realising that their actions would be considered benefit fraud.

 

Whoever they approach for legal advice needs to be told 100% the truth, so they know best way to proceed in court.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What confused me is the OP saying they worked part time and entered into full-time education around the same time.

 

I just raised the question as to whether they knowingly gave false information to gain a benefit, they would not have qualified for otherwise.

 

Just trying not to make any assumptions as to what the OP originally intended. They might have made a mistake without fully realising that their actions would be considered benefit fraud.

 

Whoever they approach for legal advice needs to be told 100% the truth, so they know the best way to proceed in court.

 

Yes, I unfortunately knowingly said 'NO' to the question if I was a student at that time because I was financially struggling to cope with rent and everything else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I checked if I could get Legal aid, I do not qualify for legal aid. I'll ask duty solicitor on the day of hearing if I could get any help. No, I did not talk to CAB yet but I am trying to arrange an appointment with local community law centre.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What confused me is the OP saying they worked part time and entered into full time education around the same time.

 

I just raised the question as to whether they knowlingly gave false information to gain a benefit, they would not have qualified for otherwise.

 

Just trying not to make any assumptions as to what the OP originally intended. They might have made a mistake without fully realising that their actions would be considered benefit fraud.

 

Whoever they approach for legal advice needs to be told 100% the truth, so they know best way to proceed in court.

 

Yes, unfortunately, I knowingly gave false information to gain benefit. as I was struggling financially.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, unfortunately, I knowingly gave false information to gain benefit. as I was struggling financially.

 

That is not good then and you should have admitted it when you had the meeting with the council.

 

If you are still attending university, if you have access to student union or other body that helps students with issues, perhaps they have a legal rep they use. I doubt you are the only student to have done this.

 

I would guess you admit guilt and fully explain your mitigating circumstances that drove you to do this. A local Solicitors might know what you are likely to face. E.g community order.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is not good then and you should have admitted it when you had the meeting with the council.

 

If you are still attending university, if you have access to student union or other body that helps students with issues, perhaps they have a legal rep they use. I doubt you are the only student to have done this.

 

I would guess you admit guilt and fully explain your mitigating circumstances that drove you to do this. A local Solicitors might know what you are likely to face. E.g community order.

 

Thank you so much for your advice.

Also, I do not hold British citizenship but I have Indefinite Leave to Remain. In future when I apply for Nationality would I be rejected by Home office because I committed fraud?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...