Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unknown CCJ for Preistly Crowe CMC PPI reclaim fees


dj1233
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2411 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

New to this forum, i have an issue with which i need help.

I've tried to convey the situation as best as possible below,

please let me know if more detail is required.

 

I was in a debt management plan some years ago which had some unpaid loans.

The Debt management company referred their inhouse partner (Priestly crowe) to check for PPI.

 

Being a bit young & dumb i agreed to this and the charges.

As the loans were still outstanding, the PPI which was 'claimed' was taken from the debt instead of being paid in a cash sum. I instead owe the money to Priestly Crowe.

 

They were paid on a monthly basis the fee which i owed.

 

Last year (October 2016) my debt management company ceased trading,

i dealt with all debtors myself.

 

I sold some belongings to have enough cash to pay everyone what was owed.

However i could not get hold of Priestly Crowe.

Their contact details had changed and i did not have the new correct ones.

 

Fast forward to about February this year and i received a call from them.

I asked them to send our paperwork for money owed so we could get a payment plan sorted. No post or no news.

The same happened in April.

 

On Saturday i received post from the CCBC Northampton about a CCJ that had been instructed by Priestly Crowe.

 

I have subsequently settled the payment as i did not want any financial implications to affect my current credit score & status.

 

Seeing how long the CCBC take to do anything,

i knew i was on a short time scale to get this processed.

 

I have questions about the process & where i stand:

 

1) I was told the claim pack had been sent from the court, but i have not received it.

They cannot provide me with proof - only that their system shows it was sent on the 12th August.

- Do i have any leg to stand to make a claim from Royal Mail?

 

I have lost 3 weeks of time to defend my case & check the facts were all correct

- debt & amount owed.

 

Plus to now defer the case would have cost a further £255 for which i would not have been able to claim back, if i was defended correctly.

 

2) Priestly Crowe LLP - Regulated by the FCA.

Should they/did they need to contact me prior to taking this action?

 

Are they obliged to show the court any proof they have attempted to contact me/show i've refused payment prior to getting a CCJ?

Or is simply their 'word' enough to get this processed?

 

3) I have asked for my history/paperwork from Priestly Crowe to check the contract, payments & the amount owed is correct.

If it isn't, am i able to process a counter claim for this amount?

Small claim court, CCJ . . . etc

 

I hope i have covered all bases here and given enough information. If not, please ask away and i will reply where i can.

 

Thanks in advance,

 

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you have an unknown ccj for fees to a PPI reclaim company?

That you've now paid?

 

Lots of waffle in your 1st post but not that clear upon what you are trying to ask?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But you've paid it now yes?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good so you wont have a CCJ registered then.

now what if there is anything you can do as an after thought now you've paid it is dependent upon money and reason..

 

yes you can set it aside

willcost you £255 unless the claimant agrees to do it for free

[doubtful]

 

you don't know what they claimed for yet and why.

 

why don't you ring Northants bulk tomorrow

ask for a copy of the Claimform to be sent email pdf

then you can fill that link in and we'll know.

 

but I gather I guessed right its for unpaid fees for them reclaiming PPI you never saw?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it will hopefully be cancelled if it is registered within the month.

 

Ideally these are the only 3 things i would like to 'solve'

 

1- I am getting the paperwork from Priestly Crowe to check the total amount is actually correct & due.

If the amount due is not correct, can i claim this back?

 

2- Are Priestly Crowe obliged to allow me to offer to pay to seeking a CCJ? Is it in breech of FCA rules/standards

 

3- Where do i stand in not receiving the claim form?

Any action i can take to the court &/or Royal Mail.

In my opinion is due to lack of service/negligence i have not received this paperwork

 

so why don't you ring Northants bulk tomorrow

- called them this morning.

A copy pack cannot be sent is what i was advised as a CCJ has already been issued.

 

ask for a copy of the Claimform to be sent email pdf - could not be done, or so i was told

 

then you can fill that link in and we'll know.

but I gather I guessed right its for unpaid fees for them reclaiming PPI you never saw? correct.

Edited by dj1233
Link to post
Share on other sites

you can ask for a copy of the claimform

- you need the poc to see if you might have a defence to accompany the set aside should you have a reason for that too.

 

have you moved since you took the DMP with those fleecers who were?

 

1. get an sar running to them. then there MIGHT be somethings reclaimable.

 

2. theres nowt you can do about no previous letters, quite usual sadly

 

3. not Rmail problem sadly.

 

all this could be explained if you've moved since you took the DMP out

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can ask for a copy of the claimform - you need the poc to see if you might have a defend to accompany the set aside should you have a reason for that too. i will call again tomorrow and ask for this

 

 

have you moved since you took the DMP with those fleecers who were? i have and my mail is on forwarding - not missed any mail except the claim pack. I did check with the CCBC and they do no send their mail with a 'do not forward' request. So this is not the issue i have missed it. I might add i did not move between the 12th of August and recently, it was over 3 months ago

 

 

1. get an sar running to them. then there MIGHT be somethings reclaimable. i have asked for all data from my file to be sent, i will check tomorrow if i should send a SAR as well

 

 

2. theres nowt you can do about no previous letters, quite usual sadly which is odd really, as if i sent them the claim form back and it got lost i'd have to prove i posted it!

 

 

3. not Rmail problem sadly. Brilliant. Glad they can cause an issue and have no accountability.

 

 

all this could be explained if you've moved since you took the DMP out

As above i have moved, but have missed no mail (forwarding is on with RM). It is also updated on the Electoral role too so they couldn't have missed it if they couldn't find me-the CCJ letter got to me fine!

 

Thanks for your help DX

Link to post
Share on other sites

theres your answer

letters from court like claimpacks do not get redirected

 

they say on the envelopes

 

do not redirect if my memory serves me correct.

 

not a lot you can do then.

unless you want to gamble the above is wrong.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you got the CCJ because the address was magically changed to the correct one I bet?

 

a claimform can have been sent by signed for mail..

 

they don't redirect signed for mail?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope! Both the claim form & CCJ were sent to my old address, the CCJ got forwarded as per the mail forwarding instruction.

 

Not sent by signed or recorded - normal post, which is why they could not track it and tell me what happened to it.

 

They can re-direct all mail, unless it has instructions on the envelope to not re-direct. The CCBC do not have such instructions on their envelopes

Link to post
Share on other sites

so there might be a reason there for a set aside, I got all the other letters m'lud but not the claim pack

 

you need to see the particulars of claim now

to see IF you might have a defence for the debt itself.

 

but as you signed their contract I cant see one can you?

 

don't forget also you've no CCJ anyway you've paid it so its an extra £255 to set aside to achieve what?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't do a set aside just because i didn't receive the claim pack!

There needs to be other grounds too apparently.

 

I'm not denying a debt may exist, more so the amount & of the claim and how this has been added up.

 

I'm not going for the set aside, this will be a direct question to Priestly Crowe once i have the paperwork. Might issue a CCJ in return for any money they owe me . . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites

not receiving a claimpack is a perfect grounds [reason] for a set aside

that's the reason for 99% of set asides to date

it WHY you didn't get it that the important bit

 

there are some 800'000 claimforms issued every year

most [85%] are never contested [default rubberstamped judgements that no human ever touched]

 

the majority of those are from Private parking companies and DCA's

a good number are [purposefully] filed to the last known address because the 'debtor' had moved and had not in writing informed their 'creditors' they have moved

then the judgement magically appears at the correct address.

 

your issue [were you to attempt a set aside] is a basic defence for the debt itself IF the judge were to grant the set aside

 

I think your SAR will be invaluable

but I wouldn't go issuing a court claim

simple reclaim will do DJ.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not receiving a claimpack is a perfect grounds [reason] for a set aside

that's the reason for 99% of set asides to date

it WHY you didn't get it that the important bit i know. they said it was sent on the 12th August, so i should have received it by the 14th. i'll be pushing them tomorrow to send me proof of postage.

 

there are some 800'000 claimforms issued every year

most [85%] are never contested [default rubberstamped judgements that no human ever touched]

 

the majority of those are from Private parking companies and DCA's

a good number are [purposefully] filed to the last known address because the 'debtor' had moved and had not in writing informed their 'creditors' they have moved

then the judgement magically appears at the correct address. With my mail forwarder it should have been sent to my new address, so that's my query the one bit of mail i 'need' has gone amiss.

 

your issue [were you to attempt a set aside] is a basic defence for the debt itself IF the judge were to grant the set aside absolutely, for me i did not think paying the extra fee was worth the pain tbh

 

I think your SAR will be invaluable

but I wouldn't go issuing a court claim

simple reclaim will do DJ.

I'll get this processed if i don;t get all the information i need from them. I'll be going through it with a fine tooth comb. I've got some paperwork, but not sure if i have all.
Link to post
Share on other sites

id just concentrate on getting the claimform by email PDF

they dont have to provide any proof sadly that they posted it.

 

just one of those things, its gone missing.

don't think the outcome would have been any diff had you got it TBH

 

who was the fee paying DMP with ?

we've seen unfair practices' by almost forcing patrons to use their reclaimers at vastly inflated fees

when they should have also been told they could have gone elsewhere or do it themselves cheaper.

 

might be an angle once we know

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DMP was a company called Gemstone, who were formerly taken over (i can't remember the name of them)

 

I've got my paperwork through today from Priestly Crowe so i will be going through that.

 

Not had a chance to call CCBC today for aa copy of the claim pack, will try tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the paperwork i have from Priestly Crowe it contains their claim pack:

 

1st query:

 

On the request for judgement & reply section, it says you must confirm the particulars of claim have been served in accordance with the rules.

 

Section A:

They have ticked 'the defendant has not filed an admission or defence to my claim' :

How could i when i did not have paperwork to do so?

 

Claim form: Particulars of claim:

They 'claim' they tried to make contact.

As i mentioned in my 1st post they made only 2 phone calls in 6 months,

on each i requested paperwork to be sent out.

- does there have to be proof submitted for this claim of no contact?

 

They are also charging me interest on the dates where i was also paying.

Are they allowed to do this despite them receiving payments?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they don't know you didn't get the claimform.

 

no proof of contact is needed

 

section 69 int can be charged

 

the claimform went undefended

they didn't have to prove anything

no human saw it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct shouldn't happen

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...