Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA & HB to UC (Including JSA and HB) – Potential Lost Income Problem


essexmat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2359 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As you know HB Jsa/esa is in a transitional period dependent on area so she does.

I dont normally comment on dwp cases as im always asking her.

She will have far superior knowledge than I will ever have on the subject. Hence why I asked her.

Her 1st question was how many tenants on the lease. 3 I said.

Are all claiming benefits?

Yes I said , one joint claim, one single claim.

She said so its a double claim but a triple lease. Each are responsible for 1/3 each irrespective. Tho is calculated into the joint claim and are paid slightly more.

This stops one joint party having a "cash cow" in the single room and paying more percentage wise than the joint claim.

 

You see, OP I was on your side, I was trying to get you to see that your being taken as a free ride, a cash cow....

 

But with comments from you and HB like "end of" and "you have no knowledge " ill let you think your being maltreated by the DWP when in reality your not.

I just hope, for you sake, the DWP dont revisit your claim as you might, just might be regretful.

Thread removed from my subscribe list

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could be accepted for esa I am in support group for anxiety and depression.

 

Thank you Carly but from experience there is no chance. Apart from medication changes, some CBT and help from GP I know I will not get enough points for ESA to continue so I have accepted I will be taken off of it as many people are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be right that matt pays 50% of the rent - it would only be 1/3 if there were 3 rooms.

 

Have you put your details through a UC calculator? The problem is, the benefit is new that many people don't know (despite you not being in a strange situation) much about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone gets it at last. Thank you.

Council LHA are not wrong for all the times I have claimed as they have looked at my tenancy a few times.

 

Yes, done UC calculator,

comes out at £599.30 instead of £674.90 I get now so £75.00 less

- managed to cut a few things down already

and also energy tariff transfer

so all in all around £40.00 worse off when it happens

- not great but I will haveto survive.

 

What worries me is waiting 6 weeks for first payment when it happens

 

...and yes, I agree, not many people even at JC seem to know much about UC at present!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

UPDATE - 06/11/2017

 

So, the inevitable happened - DWP called at 8.30am on Sunday (yes SUNDAY!) and I was told I had zero points (shock horror)

 

I was told that my final ESA payment of £93.99 would be paid on Thursday (not a full 2 weeks so short) - I am guessing they inform LA so my HB is also stopped?

 

I claimed my UC on line, not as tedious and complicated as I thought - took me about 30 minutes and got the automated response to say they would be in contact in 2 working days so I am expecting a call about my initial appointment tomorrow I guess. I will start to get together my last P45, ID, tenancy agreement, bank statement etc ready for processing.

 

To put my mind at ease I called UC today and for once they helped! I said I got around £674.90 on ESA and HB and asked what the likely amount I would get would likely be under UC. They accessed my claim and it showed £579.49 on December 18th (first payment) which is £317.82 base element (JSA) and £261.67 housing (£785.00 full rent / 3 people) So, I have lost out to the tune of £95.41pm - great eh? I will however contact my LA to see if I can get some discretionary housing payments.

 

I am guessing I do nothing now apart from wait? I am exempt from the 7 day wait as I am moving from ESA so I will mention this at my first interview. Will my first paymet then be the £579.49 or will I get 6 weeks money and then the £579.49 from January? My Fathers claim for HB will remain the same as he is on high level DLA so I have told him to not do anything as this is only to do with my claim

 

All in all not great losing almost £100pm - I am working at reducing costs my changing energy supplier and cutting other costs such as mobile so I reckon I can get it to around a £70pm reduction which is still bad enough. Costs are rising and yet I am being granted LESS money but I am a survivor and will do the best I can. What gratesme the most is that I will see the 'work coach' who will ask about what jobs I am looking for etc yet my GP says I am unfit for work - just a shame some oik at the DWP sitting behind a desk has decided I am fit for work!

 

Onwards and upwards (or downwards as the case may be!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the brown envelope has dropped through the letterbox ....

 

As expected, the report is full of lies and things that were never discussed or done at the WCA but I expected that.

 

How do the DWP get away with blatant lies about people?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, now that I have had a chance to calm down a bit ....

 

Been through my report, there are so many lies it is unreal. I have annotated 14 pieces of script that NEVER happened/NEVER discussed.

 

I am not appealing, I accept I do not have enough for 15 points but the fact that they have annotated stuff that never took place is beyond disgusting from an organisation like the DWP (although expected as they simply do not care)

 

Called UC as still no word on my claim and initial appointment - they said I am on system and they are "running behind" although they said as I have a 7 day exemption moving from ESA my first UC payment (albeit nigh on £100 less than ESA/HB) is 11th December as long as my ID etc is OK- still a 5 week wait which is simply unethical and inhumane.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a thought last night - not sure how relevant it is.

 

As my HB is worked out as 1/3 as there are 3 of us in a 2 bed bungalow it is £785/3 = £261.67pm.

 

My Father gets his half rent for him and my Mother at £392.50pm

 

Now, if our tenancy agreement shows all of us would it be feasible for us all to claim £261.67pm making up the whole rent or because my Father and Mother share they can only get their £392.50 for the one room? - they are exempt from reductions as they are pension age and on DLA

 

I think the answer is no because I claim for the one room and they claim for the other room but I am asking as we are JOINT TENANANTS so thought we may be able to claim individually?

 

Also, if anyone can help, as I am now on UC my H|D has reduced by approx £120pm so around £30pw. Is it worh trying for DHP or will it be rejected as what I am getting is what is deemed 'fair' as 1/3 of the rent?

 

Sorry for so many questions - a mixture of anger and not knowing what to do next so looking for any help possible

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...